green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas J. Koliboski
See United States v. Couming, 445 F.2d 555, 557 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 949 , 92 S.Ct. 291 , 30 L.Ed.2d 266 (1971) ("willful” has no “talismanic characteristics”; “if it was shown that [the defendant] knew the requirements of the law and deliberately refrained from complying, then he had the 'bad purpose’ of specifically intending to violate the law.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Daniel Freeman, Robert Temp and Alaine Carter Temp, Defendants
See United States v. White, 444 F.2d 1274, 1280 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 949 , 92 S.Ct. 300 , 30 L.Ed.2d 266 (1971); Fed.R.Evid. 901(a), 901(b)(1) & (2).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Retail Delivery Drivers, Driver Salesmen, Produce Workers & Helpers Local 588 v. Servomation Corporation
See also Halcon International, Inc. v. Monsanto Australia Ltd., 446 F.2d 156 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 949 , 92 S.Ct. 286 , 30 L.Ed.2d 266 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bruce Ogilvie Irwin
(2×)
See also United States v. Couming, 445 F.2d 555, 556-57 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 949 , 92 S.Ct. 291 , 30 L.Ed.2d 266 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Bates, Jr.
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. White, 444 F.2d 1274 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 949 , 92 S.Ct. 300 , 30 L.Ed.2d 266 (1971); United States v. Toler, 440 F.2d 1242 (5th Cir. 1971); United States v. Cerullo, 435 F.2d 142 (5th Cir. 1970); Habertstroh v. Montanye, 493 F.2d 483 (2nd Cir. 1974); Holden v. United States, 388 F.2d 240 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 864 , 89 S.Ct. 146 , 21 L.Ed.2d 132 (1968). 22 In the exceptional case of contention that such comment cannot be cured by trial court instructions, the determination turns on whether the comment was extensive and stressed to the jur…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Charles Eppinette, Jr.
(2×)
See, also, United States v. Couming (1st Cir. 1971) 445 F.2d 555, 556 , cert. denied 404 U.S. 949 , 92 S.Ct. 291 , 30 L.Ed.2d 266 . 32 This conclusion of mine is in accord with the decisions of the other Circuits which have considered the issue.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Strahan
v.
Strahan
v.
Strahan
No. 71-365.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 9, 1971.
Douglas, Granted, Set, Should.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and case set for oral argument.