green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.4 score
“a court might disagree with the school authorities' professional judgment, but it should not take over the operation of their schools.”
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Cape v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Ass'n
But see Johnston v. Hodges, 372 F.Supp. 1015 (E.D.Ky.1974). 12 .See, e. g., King v. Saddleback Jr. College Dist., 445 F.2d 932 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 404 U.S. 979 , 92 S.Ct. 342 , 30 L.Ed.2d 294 (1971); Olff v. East Side Union High School Dist., 445 F.2d 932 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied 404 U.S. 1042 , 92 S.Ct. 703 , 30 L.Ed.2d 736 (1972) (sex-based hair length regulations in public schools); cf. Hill v. Estelle, 537 F.2d 214 (5th Cir. 1976) (sex-based grooming, room decoration, and phone use regulations in prison). 13 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Byars v. City of Waterbury, No. Cv99-0152489s (Jun. 3, 1999)
a court might disagree with the school authorities' professional judgment, but it should not take over the operation of their schools.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Provenzano
See United States v. Baca, 444 F.2d 1292 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 979 , 92 S.Ct. 347 , 30 L.Ed.2d 294 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of Public Service Regulation
See King v. Saddle-back Junior College District, 425 F.2d 426 , 428 n. 2 (9th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 979 , 92 S.Ct. 342 , 30 L.Ed.2d 294 , (1971), 404 U.S. 1042 , 92 S.Ct. 703 , 30 L.Ed.2d 736 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mountain States Tel. & Tel. v. DEPT. OF PUB. SERV.
See King v. Saddleback Junior College District, 425 F.2d 426 , 428 n. 2 (9th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 979 , 92 S.Ct. 342 , 30 L.Ed.2d 294 , (1971), 404 U.S. 1042 , 92 S.Ct. 703 , 30 L.Ed.2d 736 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anthony Calabro v. United States Board of Parole
See Buchanan v. Clark, 5 Cir. 1971, 446 F.2d 1379 , cert. denied, 1971, 404 U.S. 979 , 92 S.Ct. 347 , 30 L.Ed.2d 294 ; Tarlton v. Clark, 5 Cir. 1971, 441 F.2d 384 , cert. denied, 1971, 403 U.S. 934 , 91 S.Ct. 2263 , 29 L.Ed.2d 713 ; Thompkins v. United States Board of Parole, 5 Cir. 1970, 427 F.2d 222 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Tyson v. Norton
See King v. Saddleback Junior College District, 425 F.2d 426 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 979 , 92 S.Ct. 342 , 30 L.Ed.2d 294 (1971); Unicon Management Corp. v. Koppers Co., 366 F.2d 199 (2d Cir. 1966); Valentine v. Indianapolis-Marion County Building Authority, 355 F.Supp. 1240 (S.D.Ind.1973); United States v. Feature Sports, Inc., 348 F. Supp. 966 (S.D.N.Y.1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Bell v. United States Forest Service
See King v. Saddleback Junior College District, 425 F.2d 426 (9th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 979 , 92 S.Ct. 342 , 30 L.Ed.2d 294 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Provenzano, in No. 79-1912, and Thomas Andretta, in No. 79-1913
See, e. g., United States v. Baca, 444 F.2d 1292, 1296 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 404 U.S. 979 , 92 S.Ct. 347 , 30 L.Ed.2d 294 (1971); United States v. Sine, 461 F.Supp. 565, 568 (D.S.C.1978); United States v. Miranda, 442 F.Supp. 786, 789 (S.D.Fla.1977); United States v. Parr, 399 F.Supp. 883, 887 (S.D.Tex.1975); United States v. Quicksey, 371 F.Supp. 561, 564 (S.D.W.Va.1974). 22 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kelley v. Johnson
(2×)
See, e. g., King v. Saddleback Junior College Dist., 445 F. 2d 932 (CA9), cert. denied, 404 U. S. 979 (1971); Gfell v. Rickelman, 441 F. 2d 444 (CA6 1971); Ferrell v. Dallas Independent School Dist., 392 F. 2d 697 (CA5), cert. denied. 393 U. S. 856 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Buchanan
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 71-5349.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 22, 1971.
Douglas, Granted, Set, Should.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and case set for oral argument.