green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Members of the California Democratic Congressional Delegation v. Eu
(2×)
See Bartley v. Finch, 311 F.Supp. 876, 878 (E.D.Ky.1970), aff'd 404 U.S. 980 , 92 S.Ct. 442 , 30 L.Ed.2d 364 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nellie Pohlmeyer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
See also Bartley v. Finch, 311 F.Supp. 876, 878 (E.D.Ky.1970), aff'd, 404 U.S. 980 , 92 S.Ct. 442 , 30 L.Ed.2d 364 (1971) (no jurisdiction to consider challenge to Secretary’s benefit determination under 42 U.S.C. § 424a without having exhausted administrative remedies); Bailey v. Finch, 312 F.Supp. 918, 920 (N.D.Miss.1970) (same).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Walter Francis Tremayne v. L. S. Nelson, Warden of San Quentin Prison
See, e. g., In Re Terry, 4 Cal.3d 911, 923-24 , 95 Cal.Rptr. 31, 40 , 484 P.2d 1375, 1384 , cert. dismissed, 404 U.S. 980 , 92 S.Ct. 348 , 30 L.Ed.2d 295 (1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Severance v. Weinberger
Compare Bartley v. Finch, 311 F.Supp. 876 (E.D.Ky.1970), aff’d 404 U.S. 980 , 92 S.Ct. 442 , 30 L.Ed.2d 364 (1971). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Severance v. Weinberger
Compare Bartley v. Finch, 311 F.Supp. 876 (E.D.Ky.1970), aff'd 404 U.S. 980 , 92 S.Ct. 442 , 30 L.Ed.2d 364 (1971). [2] Malcolm Severance was employed for many years as an airborne electronics production specialist for the Department of Navy. [2-A] Children's benefits are established by 42 U.S.C. § 402 (d) and are available on terms and conditions specified therein to those who qualify as "child" is defined in 42 U.S.C. § 416 (e) and (h)(2) and (h)(3). [3] Watts v. Veneman, 476 F.2d 529 , at 531, n. 4 (D.C.Cir.1973). [4] August 28, 1950, c. 809, Title I, §§ 101, 104, Public Law 81-734, 64 …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Terry
v.
California
v.
California
No. 71-323.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 24, 1971.
Published
Sup. Ct. Cal. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.