green
Positive treatment
4.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Looney
Id. at 710 ; see Bricker v. Sceva Speare Hosp., 111 N.H. 276 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 995 (1971) (hereinafter Sceva).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital
See generally Brisker v. Sceva Speare Hosp., 111 N.H. 276 , 281 A.2d 589 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 995 , 92 S.Ct. 535 , 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971) (upholding a hospital’s unilateral decision to terminate a physician’s staff privileges).
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Alice Peck Day Memorial Hosp
See generally Bricker v. Sceva Speare Hosp., Ill N.H. 276, cert, denied, 404 U.S. 995 (1971) (upholding a hospital's unilateral decision to terminate a physician's staff privileges).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James F. Johnson
Accord, United States v. Manning, 448 F.2d 992, 998-99 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 995 , 92 S.Ct. 541 , 30 L.Ed.2d 548 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez-Torres
See United States v. Manning, 448 F.2d 992, 998 (2d Cir.) (on rehearing en banc), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 995 , 92 S.Ct. 541 , 30 L.Ed.2d 548 (1971) (Friendly, J.) (untested informant said he saw defendant in home of his girlfriend with narcotics; officer confirmed certain facts given by the informant plus fact that informant’s car was thén parked in area, but even if that was not enough, anything lacking in scales was supplied by the agents’ hearing running, scuffling, and hurried conversations inside the apartment after agent had knocked on door and twice identified himself as a federal …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martin F. Burke
See United States v. Manning, 448 F.2d 992, 1001-02 (2 Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 995 , 92 S.Ct. 541 , 30 L.Ed.2d 548 (1971). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Smith v. Director, Patuxent Institution
See United States v. Manning, 448 F.2d 992, 997 , 1001 et seq. (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 995 , 92 S.Ct. 541 , 30 L.Ed.2d 548 (1971); United States v. Harris, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 270 , 435 F.2d 74 (1970). 8 In any event, in this case, Smith’s argument that the two officers’ method of entry was illegal is based upon the factual assumption that those officers failed to state their purpose.
cited
Cited "see"
James Raffone, Sr. v. Frederick E. Adams, Warden, Connecticut Correctional Institution, Somers, Connecticut
See United States v. Manning, 448 F.2d 992 (2 Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 995 (1971) (majority opinion, Friendly, Ch.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Failla
See United States v. Manning, en banc, 448 F.2d 992 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 995 , 92 S.Ct. 541 , 30 L.Ed.2d 548 (1971), and Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 91 , 85 S.Ct. 223 , 13 L.Ed.2d 142, 145 (1964).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Powell v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
See, e.g., Delome v. Union Barge Line Co., 444 F.2d 225, 233 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 995 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Berry v. American Commercial Barge Lines
(2×)
Co. (2d Cir.1939), 107 F.2d 999 , with Sweeney v. American Steamship Co. (6th Cir.1974), 491 F.2d 1085 ) or as undergoing repairs of such a major character as to amount to a withdrawal from navigation ( Wixom v. Boland Marine & Manufacturing Co. (5th Cir.1980), 614 F.2d 956 ; see also Delome v. Union Barge Line Co. (5th Cir.1971), 444 F.2d 225 , cert. denied (1971), 404 U.S. 995 , *362 30 L.Ed.2d 547 , 92 S.Ct. 534 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yonofsky v. Wernick
See, e. g., Delome v. Union Barge Line Co., 444 F.2d 225 , 233 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 995 , 92 S.Ct. 534 , 30 L.Ed.2d 547 (1971); DeVries v. Starr, 393 F.2d 9, 10-11 (10th Cir. 1968); Pattiz v. Schwartz, 386 F.2d 300 , 301 (8th Cir. 1968); White v. Fawcett Publications, 324 F.Supp. 403, 404-406 (W.D.Mo.1971); Holm v. Shilensky, 269 F.Supp. 359, 360-361 (S.D.N.Y.1967), aff’d, 388 F.2d 54 (2d Cir. 1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Delome
v.
Union Barge Line Co.
v.
Union Barge Line Co.
No. 71-454.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 14, 1971.
Douglas, Granted, Set, Should.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of American Trial Lawyers Assn, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and case set for oral argument.