green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Camp
See generally Charleston v. Wohlgemuth, 332 F.Supp. 1175 (E.D.Pa.1971) (court notes that testimony concerning adverse effect of reimbursement policies on welfare recipients is impressive, though not legally determinative), aff'd mem., 405 U.S. 970 , 92 S.Ct. 1204 , 31 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Moore v. Colautti
See Charleston v. Wohlgemuth, 332 F.Supp. 1175 (E.D.Pa.1971), aff’d, 405 U.S. 970 , 92 S.Ct. 1204 , 31 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
14 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1194, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7509 Anna Marie Hill Allen v. George S. Lovejoy, Director of Memphis and Shelby County Health Department, Shelby County, Tennessee
See Forbush v. Wallace, 341 F.Supp. 217 (M.D.Ala.1971), aff'd, 405 U.S. 970 , 92 S.Ct. 1197 , 31 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Allen v. Lovejoy
See Forbush v. Wallace, 341 F.Supp. 217 (M.D.Ala.1971), aff’d, 405 U.S. 970 , 92 S.Ct. 1197 , 31 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
36 Fair empl.prac.cas. 159, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,741 Doreen A. Dillon, in 83-5831 v. Ricardo Coles, Individually and in His Official Capacity as the Director of Youth Forestry Camp Number 1, Youth Forestry Camp Number One, Helen O'bannon, Individually and in Her Capacity as the Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Public Welfare, and the Pa. Dept. Of Public Welfare. Appeal of Ricardo Coles, Youth Forestry Camp Number One, and the Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
See also Charleston v. Wohlgemuth, 332 F.Supp. 1175 (E.D.Pa.1971) (3 Judge court), aff'd mem., 405 U.S. 970 , 92 S.Ct. 1204 , 31 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972). 50 Just as in the unemployment benefits repayment situation we see no reason to require the state to file a separate suit to recoup the public assistance payments.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Dillon v. Coles
See also Charleston v. Wohlgemuth, 332 F.Supp. 1175 (E.D.Pa.1971) (3 Judge court), aff'd mem., 405 U.S. 970 , 92 S.Ct. 1204 , 31 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Essex Cty. Welfare Div. v. Simon
See, also, Charleston v. Wohlgemuth, 332 F. Supp. 1175 (E.D.Pa. 1971), aff'd 405 U.S. 970 , 92 S.Ct. 1204 , 31 L.Ed. 2d 246 (1972); Snell v. Wyman, 281 F. Supp. 853 (S.D.N.Y. 1968), aff'd per curiam 393 U.S. 323 , 89 S.Ct. 553 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 511 (1969); In re Marriage of Simmons, 72 Cal. App. 3d 205 , 139 Cal. Rptr. 832 (D.Ct.App. 1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McGeorge v. City of Phoenix
See, e. g., Forbush v. Wallace, 341 F.Supp. 217 (M.D.Ala.1971), aff’d, 405 U.S. 970 , 92 S.Ct. 1197 , 31 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carter
v.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
v.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
No. 71-5277.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 28, 1972.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
404 U. S. 1012. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.