green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.4 score
“(o)nce jurisdiction has attached, powers under 1651(a) should be broadly construed.”
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Application of the United States of America in the Matter of an Order Authorizing the Use of a Pen Register or Similar Mechanical Device
(2×)
(o)nce jurisdiction has attached, powers under 1651(a) should be broadly construed.
cited
Cited "see"
Grand Traverse Band v. Director, Michigan Department of Natural Resources
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 158 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Real Property & Premises Known as 63-39 Trimble Road
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 157 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972); cf. United States v. One (1) Douglas A-26B Aircraft, 662 F.2d 1372, 1373-74 (11th Cir.1981) (writ of assistance pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 70 is “designed ‘to deal with parties who seek to thwart judgments by refusals to comply with orders to perform specific acts[.]’ ”) (quoting 12 C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry Porter, Jr.
See United States v. Lococo, 450 F.2d 1196, 1199 (9th Cir.1971) (finding that defendant's false statements were material because they "curbed the flow of information to the grand jury"), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 (1972); see also United States v. Salinas, 923 F.2d 339, 341 (5th Cir.1991) (finding that witness' concealment of prior conviction from judge prevented judge from making an informed decision as to whether government could question witness about that conviction). 15 AFFIRMED. * The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed.R.…
cited
Cited "see"
Greg L. Kubiak v. Holland Motor Express, Inc.
See Monroe v. Board of Commissioners, 453 F.2d 259 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 (1972) (party was guilty of bad faith or vexatious behavior).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bedoni v. Navajo-Hopi Indian Relocation Commission
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152 (9th Cir.1971), ce rt. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972); Hamilton v. MacDonald, 503 F.2d 1138 (9th Cir.1974); Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 544 F.2d 396 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931 , 97 S.Ct. 1550 , 51 L.Ed.2d 774 (1977). .The Navajo disputed the boundaries of the partition order.
cited
Cited "see"
Hedgepeth v. Fruehauf Corp.
See Noonan v. Midland Capital Corp., 453 F.2d 459 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 333 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blackburn Truck Lines, Inc. v. Raymond J. Francis, an Individual Maria Francis, an Individual Crisp International, Inc., a Georgia Corporation
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 157 (9th Cir.) (“The equitable jurisdiction of a federal court extends to supplemental or ancillary bills brought for the purpose of effectuating a decree of the same court.”), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
City & County of Honolulu v. Hawaii Newspaper Agency, Inc.
See, Noonan v. Midland Capital Corporation, 453 F.2d 459, 463 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. *1027 2044, 32 L.Ed.2d 333 (1972); O’Brien v. Thali, 283 F.2d 741 (2d Cir.1960); Daniels v. Pacific-Atlantic S.S.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 155-58 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alpine Land & Reservoir Co.
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 155-58 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 157 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. United States Gypsum Company
See United States v. Dukow, 453 F.2d 1328, 1330 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2042 , 32 L.Ed.2d 331 (1972). 6 On this point, the court charged as follows: Secondly, you must determine whether the purpose for the exchange of competitive information between the Defendants and their alleged coconspirators was to insure a good faith meeting of competition, as a defense to the Robinson-Patman Act.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. United States Gypsum Co.
See United States v. Dukow, 453 F.2d 1328, 1330 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2042 , 32 L.Ed.2d 331 (1972). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gurtman v. Commissioner
See Big "D" Development Corp. v. Commissioner, 453 F. 2d 1365 (5th Cir. 1972) , affirming per curiam a Memorandum Opinion of this Court, certiorari denied 406 U.S. 945 (1972) ; Mills v. Commissioner, 399 F. 2d 744 , 748 (4th Cir. 1968) , affirming a Memorandum Opinion of this Court.
cited
Cited "see"
William Bond, Etc. v. Alton White, Etc., United States of America v. Twiggs County Georgia, Etc.
See Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 ; W.
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. Commissioner
See Big "D" Development Corp. v. Commissioner, 453 F.2d 1365 (5th Cir. 1972) , affirming per curiam a Memorandum Opinion of this Court, certiorari denied 406 U.S. 945 (1972) ; Mills v. Commissioner, 399 F.2d 744 , 748 (4th Cir. 1968) , affirming a Memorandum Opinion of this Court; Manuel D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stokes v. Children's Hospital, Inc.
See also Noonan v. Midland Capital Corp., 453 F.2d 459, 462 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 333 (1972) (ruling for defendant as a matter of law after the jury twice reported itself deadlocked); Gonzalez v. Avon Prods., Inc., 648 F.Supp. 1404, 1407 (D.Del.1986), aff'd, 822 F.2d 53 (3d Cir.1987) (ruling that jury’s failure to reach a verdict in this case did not bar defendant’s motion); Street v. Hedgepath, 607 A.2d 1238, 1244 (D.C.App.1992) (holding that express language of Rule 50 gave trial court jurisdiction to grant motion after mistrial declared).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
54 Fair empl.prac.cas. 616, 55 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,464 United States of America v. Johnnie F. Clark, United States of America v. Theresa Jeffery
A statement is material “if it ‘has a natural tendency to influence, or was capable of influencing, the decision of’ the decisionmaking body to which it was addressed.” Kungys, 485 U.S. at 770 , 108 S.Ct. at 1546 , quoting Weinstock v. United States, 231 F.2d 699, 701-02 (D.C.Cir.1956); see also United States v. Lococo, 450 F.2d 1196, 1199 (9th Cir.1971) (Lococo) (under 18 U.S.C. § 1621 , a statement is material if it “tends to influence the grand jury”), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2040 , 32 L.Ed.2d 331 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp.
See also Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152 (9th Cir.1971) (district court has ancillary jurisdiction over petition for writ of assistance to enforce its earlier order declaring rights in land), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wards Co. v. Jonnet Development Corp.
See also Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152 (9th Cir.1971) (district court has ancillary jurisdiction over petition for writ of assistance to enforce its earlier order declaring rights in land), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arturo Perez
See also Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 155 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972); United States v. Clearfield State Bank, 497 F.2d 356, 358-59 (10th Cir.1974); Peake v. First National Bank and Trust Company of Marquette, 717 F.2d 1016, 1019-20 (6th Cir.1983). 3 It is entirely plain that the January 1984 order of the district court was, and was intended to be, the final dispositive and adjudicatory action of the district court, rather than an opinion or findings.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McKee Inc., a New York Corporation v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago, an Illinois Body Politic and Corporate, McKee Inc., a New York Corporation, Interpleader v. Monticello Realty Corporation, Interpleader and World Express, Inc., Interpleader
See also Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 156 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McKee-Berger-Mansueto, Inc. v. Board of Education
See also Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152, 156 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mader v. Crowell
See, e. g., Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2044 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972) (purpose of three-judge court is fulfilled when its judgment is entered, and single judge may act to enforce judgment); Allen v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, 249 F.2d 462 (4th Cir. 1957) (single judge may fix time for complying with three-judge desegregation order); and Pabst v. Campbell, 150 F.Supp. 71 (S.D.Ind. 1957) (following judgment of three-judge court, single judge may assess damages and costs against plaintiffs and their injunction bond suretie…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Manfredi
See also United States v. Palmieri, 456 F.2d 9, 13-14 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 2054 , 32 L.Ed.2d 332 (1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Crow
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 71-1158.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 22, 1972.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.