green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morgan
See United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117, 122 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972); Aloi, supra, 449 F.Supp. at 727 .
discussed
Cited "see"
John Wolens v. F.W. Woolworth Co., J.C. Penney Company, Inc., and Wear-Ever Aluminum, Inc.
See Universal Oil Products Co. v. Globe Oil *992 & Refining Co., 137 F.2d 3, 6 (7th Cir.1943), aff’d, 322 U.S. 471 , 64 S.Ct. 1110 , 88 L.Ed. 1399 (1944); accord, Ellipse Corp. v. Ford Motor Co., 452 F.2d 163, 169 (7th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Packard
(2×)
See Roper v. Beto, 454 F.2d 499 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S. Ct. 2053 , 32 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Barrise
See United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117, 122 (2 Cir. 1972), cert. den. 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Wells Mfg. Corp., a Wisconsin Corporation v. Littelfuse, Inc., a Texas Corporation
See Ellipse Corporation v. Ford Motor Company, 452 F.2d 163 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bynum
See generally United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117, 121 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972) (inadvertent crossing out of provision that authority would not terminate with first interception); United States v. Bridges, 419 F.2d 963 (8th Cir. 1969) (common sense reading of affidavit to support finding of probable cause); State v. Bisaccia, 58 N.J. 586 , 279 A.2d 675 (1971) (misidentification *455 of house number because agent thought numbers ran in one direction rather than the other).
cited
Cited "see"
Matthews v. State
See and compare the bare recital found sufficient in Delany v. State, 475 S.W.2d 102, 103 [1] (Mo.19711, cert. den, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2053 , 32 L.Ed.2d 336 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cox v. State
Compare United States v. Poeta, 455 F2d 117 (2d Cir. 1972) (cert. denied 406 U. S. 948 ); United States v. Armocida, 515 F2d 29 (3d Cir. 1975) (cert. denied 423 U. S. 858 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carroll D. Ford. United States of America v. Wesley Dessaso A/K/A Wesley Dessaso, Jr. United States of America v. Steve F. Dacosta. United States of America v. Daniel Haile, Jr. United States of America v. Melvin E. Smith
See also United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ford
See also United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Barbara Hinton
See, e. g., United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117, 122 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972) (only those persons who have a privacy interest in the residence in which the tapped phone is located have standing). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.
See, e. g., Ellipse Corp. v. Ford Motor Co., 452 F.2d 163 , 170 n.6 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972); Woodstream Corporation v. Herter’s, Inc., 446 F.2d 1143, 1156 (8th Cir. 1971); Tapco Products Co. v. Van Mark Products Corp., 446 F.2d 420, 426 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 986 , 92 S.Ct. 451 , 30 L.Ed.2d 370 (1971); cf. Philips Electronic and Pharmaceutical Industries Corp. v. Thermal and Electronics Industries, Inc., 450 F.2d 1164 (3d Cir. 1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ricco
See, e. g., United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117, 122 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972); United States v. Scott, 164 U.S.App.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. DiMuro
See, e. g., United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117, 121-22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerome Dimuro, United States of America v. Roland Lung, United States of America v. Victor Santarpio, United States of America v. Joseph Doherty and Thomas Hurley
See, e. g., United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117, 121-22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alphonse Cirillo
Compare Manfredi, supra, with United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117, 121 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 32 L.Ed.2d 337 (1972) and United States v. Rizzo, 492 F.2d 443 (2d Cir. 1974). (b) Failure to Hold a Minimization Hearing Appellants next argue that the district court should not have denied their motions to suppress the wiretap evidence without first holding an evidentiary hearing to determine whether minimization had in fact been achieved during the entire course of the wiretap of the Cirillo and Sorrentino phones.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bush
v.
Foster
v.
Foster
No. 71-6376.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 22, 1972.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.