green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glenwood M. Ford
Further, “[i]n light of the Government’s strong interest in favor of joint trials, this Court has struck a balance in favor of joinder.” United States v. Perry, 731 F.2d 985 , 992 *731 (D.C.Cir.1984); see United States v. Hines, 455 F.2d 1317, 1334 (D.C.Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 975 , 92 S.Ct. 2427 , 32 L.Ed.2d 675 (1972); Fed.R.Crim.P. 8(b).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Howard Eric Genser
(2×)
See Bell v. Kansas, 452 F.2d 783 (10th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 974 , 92 S.Ct. 2421 , 32 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John D. Ehrlichman
See United States v. Hines, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 249 , 266, 455 F.2d 1317, 1334 , cert. denied, 406 U.S. 975 , 92 S.Ct. 2427 , 32 L.Ed.2d 675 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William H. Addington
See Bell v. Kansas, 452 F.2d 783 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 974 , 92 S.Ct. 2421 , 32 L.Ed.2d 674 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Roland T. Butler, United States of America v. Norman C. Tillette, United States of America v. Augustine F. Barquin, United States of America v. C. Jimmie Vaccaro, Jr., United States of America v. Charles L. Clay
See, e.g., United States v. Hines, 455 F.2d 1317, 1334 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 975 , 92 S.Ct. 2427 , 32 L.Ed.2d 675 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Butler
See, e.g., United States v. Hines, 455 F.2d 1317, 1334 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 975 , 92 S.Ct. 2427 , 32 L.Ed.2d 675 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Petullo and Anthony Argentiere
See, e.g., United States v. Hines, 455 F.2d 1317, 1334-35 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 975 , 92 S.Ct. 2427 , 32 L.Ed.2d 675 (1972); United States v. Blue, 440 F.2d 300, 302-03 (7th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 836 , 92 S.Ct. 123 , 30 L.Ed.2d 68 (1971); United States v. Hutul, 416 F.2d 607, 621-22 (7th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1007 , 90 S.Ct. 562 , 24 L.Ed.2d 499 (1970); but see Hines, 455 F.2d at 1335-36 (Bazelon, C.J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Copening v. United States
Compare Patterson v. United States, D.C.App., 301 A.2d 67 (1973), with United States v. Wilder, supra. Cf. Bell v. Kansas, 452 F.2d 783, 793 (10th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 974 , 92 S.Ct. 2421 , 32 L.Ed.2d 674 (1972); State v. Miller, 50 Or.App. 501 , 484 P.2d 1132 (Or.App.1971), cer t. denied, 405 U.S. 1047 , 92 S.Ct. 1321 , 31 L.Ed.2d 590 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Norman Williams
See also United States v. Hines, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 249 , 455 F.2d 1317, 1335 , cert. denied, 406 U.S. 975 , 92 S.Ct. 2427 , 32 L.Ed.2d 675 (1972) (an immediate cautionary instruction is an adequate remedy for prosecution comment that “no more than incidentally ‘pointed up’ ” defendant’s failure to take the stand), quoting United States v. Barney, 371 F.2d 166, 171 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 2080 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1333 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alvin A. Beckwith, Jr., A/K/A Alvin A. Beckwith
See also the reasoning of United States v. Stamp, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 340 , 458 F.2d 759 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 975 , 92 S.Ct. 2424 , 32 L.Ed.2d 675 (1972); United States v. Robinson, 142 U.S. App.D.C. 43, 439 F.2d 553 (1970); United States v. Wong, No. 74-1636 (9th Cir. Sept. 23, 1974) (coercion in grand jury interrogation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Earl Shaver
See also United States v. Minor, 455 F.2d 937 (6th Cir. 1972), cert. den., 406 U.S. 975 , 92 S.Ct. 2426 , 32 L.Ed.2d 675 (1972); United States v. Hall, 306 F.Supp. 735 (E.D.Tenn.1969); Fish v. United States, 254 F.Supp. 906 (D.Md.1966). 3 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dixon
v.
Blackledge, Warden
v.
Blackledge, Warden
No. 71-6059.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1972.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.