green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Big O Tires, Inc. v. BIGFOOT 4× 4, INC.
See Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2411 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Conforti
See Chesebrough v. State, 255 So.2d 675, 677-78 (Fla.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2427 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Ward v. State
See Chesebrough v. State, 255 So.2d 675 (Fla. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2427 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972); Duvallon v. State, 404 So.2d 196 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brinson v. State
See Chesebrough v. State, 255 So.2d 675, 677 (Fla.1971), ce rt. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2427 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972) and Egal v. State, 469 So.2d 196 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 476 So.2d 673 (Fla.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Lanier v. State
See Chesebrough v. State, 255 So.2d 675 (Fla. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2427 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Former Fifth El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Sun Oil Company, Tenneco Oil Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Tenneco Oil Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Mobile Oil Corp. v. FPC, 463 F.2d 256 (D.C.Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2409 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Sun Oil Co.
See Mobile Oil Corp. v. FPC, 463 F.2d 256 (D.C.Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2409 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Tenneco Oil Co. v. Federal Energy Administration
See Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power Commission, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 310 , 316-17, 463 F.2d 256, 262-63 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2409 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Lubrizol Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency
(2×)
Accord, Mobil Oil Corp. v. FPC, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 310 , 463 F.2d 256, 263 , cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2409 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 , reh. denied, 409 U.S. 902 , 93 S.Ct. 100 , 34 L.Ed.2d 165 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Petitioner v. Honorable Miles W. Lord, and Pfizer, Inc., Defendants-Respondents
See Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532, 543 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2411 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anderson v. STEVEN R. ANDREWS, PA
See also Chesebrough v. State, 255 So.2d 675 (Fla.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2427 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972)(plea of nolo contendere may not be used on civil suit as admission of facts charged in complaint); Fisher v. Wainwright, 584 F.2d 691 (5th Cir.1978)(plea of nolo contendere may not be used in subsequent civil litigation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monroe Doss v. United States
United States v. Azhocar, 581 F.2d 735, 739-40 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 907 , 99 S.Ct. 1213 , 59 L.Ed.2d 454 (1979); see also Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532, 537-40 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2411 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. International Business MacHines Corp.
See, e. g., Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 , 542 (8th Cir.) (per curiam), cert, denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2411 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972); Davis v. Cities Service Oil Co., 420 F.2d 1278, 1282 (10th Cir. 1970); In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381, 388-89 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961); Tucker v. Kemer, 186 F.2d 79, 84 (7th Cir. 1950); Whitaker v. McLean, 73 App. D.C. 259 , 118 F.2d 596 (D.C.Cir. 1941) (per curiam); Ryan v. United States, 99 F.2d 864 (8th Cir. 1938), cert, denied, 306 U.S. 635 , 59 S.Ct. 484 , 83 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1939). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parrish v. Board of Commissioners
See, e. g., Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2411 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972); 6 Mirra v. United States, 379 F.2d 782, 787-88 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1022 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967); Ryan v. United States, 99 F.2d 864, 871 (8th Cir. 1938), cert. denied, 306 U.S. 635 , 59 S.Ct. 484 , 83 L.Ed. 1037 (1939).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alfredo G. Parrish, Etc. v. Board of Commissioners of the Alabama State Bar, Etc., Defendants- Alabama Black Lawyers Association v. Board of Commissioners of the Alabama State Bar, Etc., Defendants
See, e. g., Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir.), Cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2411 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972); 6 Mirra v. United States, 379 F.2d 782, 787-88 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1022 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967); Ryan v. United States, 99 F.2d 864, 871 (8th Cir. 1938), Cert. denied, 306 U.S. 635 , 59 S.Ct. 484 , 83 L.Ed. 1037 (1939).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.
(2×)
See also Annot., 2 A.L.R.Fed. 920, 947-48 (1969). [110] Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532, 542 (8th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2411 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 ; Brotherhood of Loc.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John N. Mitchell v. Honorable John J. Sirica, Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia
See also Yablonski v. United Mine Workers, 147 U.S.App.D.C. 193 , 454 F.2d 1036 (1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 906 , 92 S.Ct. 1609 , 31 L.Ed.2d 816 (1972) (mandamus granted to compel disqualification of attorney) 21 Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 406 U.S. 976 , 92 S.Ct. 2411 , 32 L.Ed.2d 676 (1972); Wolfson v. Palmieri, 396 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1968); Rosen v. Sugarman, 357 F.2d 794 (2d Cir. 1966); In re Union Leader Corp., 292 F.2d 381 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 927 , 82 S.Ct. 361 , 7 L.Ed.2d 190 (1961); Foster v. Medina, 170 F.2d 632 (2d Cir. 1948), cert. d…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Chesebrough
v.
Florida
v.
Florida
No. 71-6442.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 7, 1972.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Published
Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.