green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Harry Contreras Valdivia, United States of America v. Roy Cohn, United States of America v. Warren Lonnel Harris, United States of America v. Carl Turner, United States of America v. William Joseph Freedman, Hernandez Cases. Group III Appeals
But see United States v. Ash, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 461 F.2d 92 , cert. granted, 407 U.S. 909 , 92 S.Ct. 2436 , 32 L.Ed.2d 682 (1972) 13 Mrs. Domingue was not the only witness to tie Turner in with the Western Union money orders.
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Valdivia
But see United States v. Ash, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 461 F.2d 92 , cert. granted, 407 U.S. 909 , 92 S.Ct. 2436 , 32 L.Ed.2d 682 (1972). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Wellford v. Commonwealth
“The curtilage of a dwelling house is a space necessary and convenient, habitually used for family purposes and the carrying on of domestic employment; the yard, garden or field which is near to and used in connection with the dwelling.” Bare v. Commonwealth, 122 Va. 783, 795 , 94 S.E. 168, 172 (1917); accord, Patler v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 448, 451 , 177 S.E.2d 618, 620 (1970), cert, denied, 407 U.S. 909 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Francis Arthur Sandoval
See Gee v. United States, 452 F.2d 849 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 407 U.S. 909 , 92 S.Ct. 2432 , 32 L.Ed.2d 683 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sainz
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that Rule 9.1 “comports with the requirement of a waiver of the defendant’s constitutional *473 rights provided that the defendant is afforded a hearing to determine whether his absence was, in fact, voluntary.” Brewer v. Raines, 670 F.2d 117, 120 (9th Cir.1982); see also State v. Tacon, 107 Ariz. 353 , 488 P.2d 973 (1971), cert. granted, 407 U.S. 909 , 92 S.Ct. 2446 , 32 L.Ed.2d 682 (1972), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 410 U.S. 351 , 93 S.Ct. 998 , 35 L.Ed.2d 346 (1973) (upholding rule that preceded current Rule 9.1).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peterson
See, also, State v. Tacon (1971) 107 Ariz. 353 , 448 P.2d 973 , cert. granted, 407 U.S. 909 , 92 S.Ct. 2446 , 32 L.Ed.2d 682 (1972), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 410 U.S. 351 , 93 S.Ct. 998 , 35 L.Ed.2d 346 (1973). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stanley Bernard Peterson, United States of America v. Eric Sylvester Smith, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Linda Lavern Smith, United States of America v. Paul James Coates, Jr., United States of America v. D'TiTinius W. Frazier, United States of America v. Lester Irby
See also State v. Davis (1972) 108 Ariz. 335 , 498 P.2d 202 , 203-04 42 See, also, State v. Tacon (1971) 107 Ariz. 353 , 448 P.2d 973 , Cert. granted, 407 U.S. 909 , 92 S.Ct. 2446 , 32 L.Ed.2d 682 (1972), Cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 410 U.S. 351 , 93 S.Ct. 998 , 35 L.Ed.2d 346 (1973) 43 Even Judge Lumbard conceded that it would be difficult "to conceive of any case * * * other than a multiple-defendant case" that would present circumstances justifying the trial court's election to proceed to trial in the absence of the accused.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Application of Rodgers
Haywood v. United States, 396 U.S. 852 , 90 S.Ct. 113 , 24 L.Ed.2d 101 (1969); see also United States v. Ash, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 461 F.2d 92 (1972), cert. granted 407 U.S. 909 , 92 S.Ct. 2436 , 32 L.Ed.2d 682 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Colon
See People v. Trice, 127 Ill.App.2d 310 , 262 N.E.2d 276 ; compare State v. Tacon (1971), 107 Ariz. 353 , 488 P.2d 973 , cert. granted, 407 U.S. 909 , 32 L.Ed.2d 682 , 92 S.Ct. 2446 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harold A. Spriggs, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of Police
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Ash, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 461 F.2d 92 (1972) (en banc), cert. granted, 407 U.S. 909 , 92 S.Ct. 2436 , 32 L.Ed.2d 682 (1972); United States v. Gambrill, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 72 , 449 F.2d 1148 (1971); United States v. Greene, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 9 , 429 F.2d 193 (1970); cf. the disposition of the case in Williams v. United States, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 158, 165 , 419 F.2d 740, 747 (1969) (en banc); and this court's procedural instructions in Clemons v. United States, 133 U.S.App.D.C. 27, 34 , 408 F.2d 1230, 1237 (1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 964 , 89 S.Ct. 1318 , 22 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campbell v. United States
See also Clawans v. Rives, 70 App.D.C. 107 , 104 F.2d 240 (1939) (nonjury case). [10] United States v. Dockery, D.C.App., 294 A.2d 158, at 161 (decided June 23, 1972) (quoting from S.Rep.No.981, 85th Cong., 1st Sess., 1957 U.S.Cong. and Adm.News p. 1863). [1] In State v. Tacon, 107 Ariz. 353 , 488 P.2d 973 (1971), cert. granted, 407 U.S. 909 , 92 S.Ct. 2446 , 32 L.Ed.2d 682 (1972), the accused, a serviceman who was not an Arizona resident, had been released on bail and had returned to his distant home.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Ash
v.
Ash
No. 71-1255.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1972.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari granted. Application of respondent for release on bail, presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court, denied without prejudice to renewed application to the District Court. See 18 U. S. C. § 3148.