green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1978 ·
…merger negotiations require a secrecy, flexibility and quickness antithetical to collective bargaining
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Matter of Lomax
(2×)
Hawks v. Lazaro, 202 S.E.2d 109, 123 (W.Va.1974) ; but see Fhagen v. Miller, 29 N.Y.2d 348 , 328 N.Y.S. 2d 393 , 278 N.E.2d 615 , cert, denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 47 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972).
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Krol
But cf. Fhagen v. Miller, 29 N.Y. 2d 348 , 328 N.Y.S. 2d 393 , 278 N.E. 2d 615 (Ct. App. 1972) cert. denied 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 47 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972). [4] It should be noted that this factual assumption has not gone undisputed in the literature.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brockway Motor Trucks, Division of Mack Trucks, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
(2×)
merger negotiations require a secrecy, flexibility and quickness antithetical to collective bargaining
discussed
Cited "see"
Providence Hospital and Mercy Hospital v. National Labor Relations Board
See International Ass’n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Northeast Airlines, Inc., 473 F.2d 549, 556-57 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972). 6 Thus, MNA had no right either to veto the decision to merge or to request information for the purpose of intruding into the negotiations between the merger partners (SPHS and HCAHR).
discussed
Cited "see"
Providence Hospital v. NLRB
See International Ass'n of ___ ______________________ Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Northeast Airlines, Inc., 473 _______________________________ _________________________ F.2d 549, 556-57 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 (1972).6 _____ ______ Thus, MNA had no right either to veto the decision to merge or to request information for the purpose of intruding into the negotiations between the merger partners (SPHS and HCAHR).
discussed
Cited "see"
Plate v. St. Mary's Help of Christians Church
See Panotex Pipe Line Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 457 F.2d 1279, 1283 (5th Cir.1972) (timing of directed verdict is within trial court’s discretion unless it violates procedural due process or denies a fair trial), cert. denied 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Burlington Northern Railroad Company
(2×)
Accord IAM v. Northeast Airlines, Inc., 473 F.2d 549 , 556-57 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972); Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Co., 385 F.2d 581, 599 (D.C.Cir.1967), cer t. denied, 390 U.S. 923 , 88 S.Ct. 851 , 19 L.Ed.2d 983 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. John T. Whitlock v. Surety Insurance Company of California
See Panotex Pipe Line Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 457 F.2d 1279, 1283 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972) (directed verdict in defendant’s favor during defendant’s presentation of issue not error where “there is nothing of record to support any denigration of procedural due process or the essence of a fair trial”).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Byrne
See Fhagen v. Miller, 29 N.Y.2d 348 , 328 N.Y.S.2d 393 , 278 N.E.2d 615 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 47 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
First National Maintenance Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
See International Assn. of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Northeast Airlines, Inc., 473 F. 2d 549, 556-557 (CA1), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 845 (1972); Raskin Packing Co., 246 N. L.
cited
Cited "see"
Promotional Marketing Corp. v. Massachusetts State Lottery Commission
See, Devcon Corp. v. Woodhill Chemical Sales Corp., 455 F.2d 830 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 (1972) (questioning the suggestiveness of the registered trademark “5 MINUTE”).
cited
Cited "see"
State Ex Rel. Doe v. Madonna
See, Fhagen v. Miller, 29 N.Y.2d 348 , 328 N.Y.S.2d 393 , 278 N.E.2d 615 , certiorari denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 47 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mignone v. Vincent
See Fhagen v. Miller, 29 N.Y.2d 348 , 328 N.Y.S.2d 393 , 278 N.E.2d 615 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 47 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972); Suzuki v. Quisenberry, 411 F.Supp. 1113 , 44 U.S.L.W. 2422 (D.Haw.1976); Bell v. Wayne County General Hospital, 384 F.Supp. 1085 (E.D.Mich.1974); Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F.Supp. 1078, 1091 (E.D.Wis.1972), vacated on other grounds, 414 U.S. 473 , 94 S.Ct. 713 , 38 L.Ed.2d 661 (1974), 421 U.S. 957 , 95 S.Ct. 1943 , 44 L.Ed.2d 445 (1975); Logan v. Arafeh, 346 F.Supp. 1265 (D.Conn.1972), aff’d, 411 U.S. 911 , 93 S.Ct. 1556 , 36 L.Ed.2d 304 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Scranton Construction Company, Inc., and Clegg Concrete, Inc. v. Litton Industries Leasing Corporation
See Panotex Pipe Line Co. v.. Phillips Petroleum Co., 457 F.2d 1279, 1287 (5th Cir. 1972), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972). 13 .
cited
Cited "see"
R. H. Colvin v. United States
Id. at 213-214 ; accord, Panotex Pipe Line Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. (5 Cir. 1972), 457 F.2d 1279, 1284 , cert, denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Forman
Collins v Carey, 421 US 973 [1975], supra; see also, Fhagen v Miller, 29 NY2d 348 [1972], cert denied 409 US 845 [1972].) Were no timely hearing available to defendant with respect to the TOP excluding him from his home, CPL 530.12 (1) (a) would indeed be unconstitutional.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ibtcwha, Local Union No. 2707 v. Western Air Lines, Inc., Air Transport Employees v. Western Air Lines, Inc.
See also International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers v. Northeast Airlines, Inc., 473 F.2d 549, 551 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Parfait v. Central Towing, Inc.
See also Panotex Pipe Line Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 457 F.2d 1279, 1289 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hilton J. Parfait v. Central Towing, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Travelers Insurance Co., Third Party Cross-Appellee, and American Motorists Insurance Co., Third Party Cross-Appellant
See also Panotex Pipe Line Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 457 F.2d 1279, 1289 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e. g., International Ass’n of Machinists v. Northeast Airlines, Inc., 473 F.2d 549 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972) (no duty to bargain over a merger which lies at the core of “entrepreneurial control”); NLRB v. Acme Industrial Products, 439 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1971) (decision to relocate part of employer’s manufacturing operations to another plant was not a mandatory bargaining subject); NLRB v. Dixie Ohio Express Co., 409 F.2d 10 (6th Cir. 1969) (per curiam) (“streamlining” operation entailing partial termination of plant operation hel…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
L. E. Davis, D/B/A Holiday Inn of Benton v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Kent Hortin and Peggy Hortin, D/B/A K-P Associates, L. E. Davis, D/B/A Holiday Inn of Benton, Intervenor
See, e. g., International Ass'n of Machinists v. Northeast Airlines, Inc., 473 F.2d 549 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972) (no duty to bargain over a merger which lies at the core of "entrepreneurial control"); NLRB v. Acme Industrial Products, 439 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1971) (decision to relocate part of employer's manufacturing operations to another plant was not a mandatory bargaining subject); NLRB v. Dixie Ohio Express Co., 409 F.2d 10 (6th Cir. 1969) (per curiam ) ("streamlining" operation entailing partial termination of plant operation held non-manda…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seymour v. Hull & Moreland Engineering
See, e. g., Casanova Guns, Inc. v. Connally, 454 F.2d 1320 , (7 Cir. 1972), Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972). 28 Viewing the jumble of federal decisions together, we find a sort of generalized federal substantive law on disregard of corporate entity which concentrates on three general factors: the amount of respect given to the separate identity of the corporation by its shareholders, the degree of injustice visited on the litigants by recognition of the corporate entity, and the fraudulent intent of the incorporators. 6 Federal decisions naturally draw upon stat…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Seymour v. Hull & Moreland Engineering
See, e. g., Casanova Guns, Inc. v. Connally, 454 F.2d 1320 , (7 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lloyd L. Hayes, Hayes, Inc. v. T. G. Solomon, Gulf States Theatres, Inc.
See also Panotex Pipe Line Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 457 F.2d 1279, 1288-89 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 86 (1972); Pacific Engineering & Production Company of Nevada v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 551 F.2d 790, 795 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 879 , 98 S.Ct. 234 , 54 L.Ed.2d 160 (1977); Purex Corp. v. Procter *978 & Gamble Co., 419 F.Supp. 931, 942 (S.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Isaac Brown, Jr., No. 73-3201 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
See also United States v. Knox, 5 Cir. 1972, 458 F.2d 612 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; United States v. Hall, 5 Cir. 1971, 440 F.2d 1277 ; Overmyer v. Loflin, 5 Cir. 1971, 440 F.2d 1213 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 851 , 92 S.Ct. 87 , 30 L.Ed.2d 90 . 4 Brown next asserts that the trial court made prejudicial comments during the trial.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brown
See also United States v. Knox, 5 Cir. 1972, 458 F.2d 612 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; United States v. Hall, 5 Cir. 1971, 440 F.2d 1277 ; Overmyer v. Loflin, 5 Cir. 1971, 440 F.2d 1213 , cert. denied, 404 U.S. 851 , 92 S.Ct. 87 , 30 L.Ed.2d 90 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dyal
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 71-1492.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.