green
Positive treatment
6.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Essex County Preservation Association on Behalf of Itself and Its Members v. Bruce Campbell, as Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Public Works
But see Greene County Planning Bd. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 455 F.2d 412 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972); Committee to Stop Route 7 v. Volpe, 346 F.Supp. 731, 741 (D.Conn.1972), aff’d sub nom., Citizens for Balanced Environment and Transportation v. Volpe, 503 F.2d 601 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 870 , 96 S.Ct. 135 , 46 L.Ed.2d 100 , 44 U.S.L.W. 3205 (1975). *960 We must stress that when project consultants are also used in preparation of the EIS considerable caution should be exercised by the federal agency.
cited
Cited "see"
L.B. Kaye Associates, Ltd. v. Jews for Jesus
See Karlin v. Avis, 457 F.2d 57 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972); Albrecht Chem.
cited
Cited "see"
Confederated Tribes And Bands Of The Yakima Indian Nation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Public Service Commission
See Greene County Planning Bd. v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972); United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Louisiana PSC, 279 So.2d 195 (La.1973); Bronx Gas & Electric Co. v. Maltbie, 268 N.Y. 278 , 197 N.E. 281 (1935). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
Jette v. Bergland
See Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 , 420 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Jette v. Bergland
See Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 , 420 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
First, this court has on occasion reviewed essentially " interlocutory" rulings made by an agency in a NEPA proceeding; see Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Commission (Greene I), 455 F.2d 412, 425 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
First, this court has on occasion reviewed essentially “interlocutory” rulings made by an agency in a NEPA proceeding; see Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Commission (Greene I), 455 F.2d 412, 425 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Commission, Power Authority of the State of New York, Intervenor
See Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 (2d Cir.), cert denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972); Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 490 F.2d 256 (2d Cir. 1973). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Callaway
See Greene County Planning Bd. v. Federal Power Comm’n, 455 F.2d 412 , 420-422 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972); I-291 Why?
cited
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Lynn
See Greene County Planning Board v. F.P.C., 455 F.2d 412 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Lynn
See Greene County Planning Board v. F.P.C., 455 F.2d 412 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Commission, Power Authority of the State of New York, Intervenor
See Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Commission, 455 F.2d 412 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972), for a further exposition of the background to this dispute. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. Froehlke
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Commission, 455 F.2d 412 , 425 (2nd Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 ; Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Committee v. Atomic Energy Commission, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 33 , 449 F.2d 1109 , 1112 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Arthur Silva v. George Romney, and Harry Wolk, Intervenor-Appellee
See Greene County Planning Board v. F.P.C., 455 F.2d 412 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wright
(2×)
See, e.g., People v. Glen, 30 N.Y.2d 252 , 331 N.Y.S.2d 656 , 282 N.E.2d 614 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 58 , 34 L.Ed.2d 91 (1972) (upholding an anticipatory warrant to search the person of an individual whose possession of certain evidence was "imminent and all but inevitable").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
See, e.g., Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 , 414-18 (2d Cir.) (Federal Power Commission's authorization of power line constituted a major federal action), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972); Silva v. Romney, 473 F.2d 287, 290-91 (1st Cir.1973) (private developer of project to which HUD funds had been committed could be enjoined pending preparation by HUD of EIS). 87 We are unpersuaded.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
See, e.g., Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 , 414-18 (2d Cir.) (Federal Power Commission’s authorization of power line constituted a major federal action), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972); Silva v. Romney, 473 F.2d 287, 290-91 (1st Cir.1973) (private developer of project to which HUD funds had been committed could be enjoined pending preparation by HUD of EIS).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Revere Copper & Brass, Inc. v. Manufacturers' Metals & Chemicals, Inc.
See also Karlin v. Avis, 457 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir.1972) [cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 ,. 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972)], citing the Albrecht ease, supra; and Restatement of the Law of Contracts, 2d, § 69, for exceptions to the general rule that silence of the offeree does not operate as acceptance, the factual bases for such exceptions not here being present.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps Of Engineers
Association v. Burns, 517 F.2d 1077 (2d Cir.1975) (upholding preliminary injunction barring construction of federally funded highway where, although FHWA reviewed and maintained contact with state agency, state agency drafted EIS and FHWA approved the EIS four days after receipt of the state draft, without alteration or comment); see also Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Commission, 455 F.2d 412, 420 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972). 106 An immediate result of these decisions was that the pace of FHWA funding for highways slowed appreciabl…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
Association v. Burns, 517 F.2d 1077 (2d Cir.1975) (upholding preliminary injunction barring construction of federally funded highway where, although FHWA reviewed and maintained contact with state agency, state agency drafted EIS and FHWA approved the EIS four days after receipt of the state draft, without alteration or comment); see also Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Commission, 455 F.2d 412, 420 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In re the Appeal from the Environmental Management Commission
See also Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Com’n, 455 F. 2d 412 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed. 2d 90 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Environmental Management Com'n, Etc.
See also Greene County Planning Board v. Federal Power Com'n, 455 F.2d 412 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Trade Commission
See, e.g., Greene County Planning Bd. v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 , 418-22 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972). 15 NEPA requires more than an after-the-fact acknowledgment of the environmental consequences that will flow from agency action; it requires that those consequences be examined in considering whether to undertake such action.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson Aeschliman v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Consumers Power Co., a Michigan Corp., Intervenor. Saginaw Valley Nuclear Study Group v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Consumers Power Company, Intervenor
See also Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 , 420 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Aeschliman v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See also Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 , 420 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Chelsea Neighborhood Associations v. United States Postal Service
Without the detailed statement the conclusions and decision of the agency appear to be detached from and unrelated to environmental concerns, see, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Morton, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 5 , 458 F.2d 827, 833-837 (1972); see also, Greene County Planning Bd. v. Federal Power Comm., 455 F.2d 412, 419 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Steubing v. Brinegar
See also Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, supra, 455 F.2d at 424--25 (power lines 80% complete) 15 Greene County Planning Bd. v. FPC, 455 F.2d 412 , 422--23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972); Calvert Cliffs' Coordinating Comm. v. AEC, 146 U.S.App.D.C. 33 , 449 F.2d 1109 , 1122 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alphonse Cirillo
Compare People v. Glen, 30 N.Y.2d 252 , 331 N.Y.S.2d 656 , 282 N.E.2d 614 , cert. denied sub nom. *880 Baker v. New York, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 58 , 34 L.Ed.2d 91 (1972) (the “fact that the warrant would on its face authorize an improper search does not undo it for all purposes”) with People v. Varney, 32 A.D.2d 181 , 301 N.Y.S.2d 330 (1969) (technical defects may be overlooked where search is conducted lawfully).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Scientists' Institute for Public Information, Inc. v. Atomic Energy Commission
See, e. g., Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 2 Cir., 455 F.2d 412 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed. 90 (1972) ; Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, 2 Cir., 453 F.2d 463 , 481 (1971) ; Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Committee v. USAEC, supra note 1. 38 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monroe County Conservation Council, Inc. v. Volpe
The requirement for a thorough study and a detailed description of alternatives, which was given further Congressional emphasis in Sec. 4332(2)(D), is the linchpin of the entire impact statement. 3 Without the detailed statement the conclusions and decision of the agency appear to be detached from and unrelated to environmental concerns, see, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Morton, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 5 , 458 F.2d 827, 833-837 (1972); see also, Greene County Planning Bd. v. Federal Power Comm., 455 F.2d 412 , 419 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972)…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Monroe County Conservation Council, Inc. v. Volpe
The requirement for a thorough study and a detailed description of alternatives, which was given further Congressional emphasis in § 4332(2) (D), is the linch pin of the entire impact statement. 3 Without the detailed statement the conclusions and decision of the agency appear to be detached from and unrelated to environmental concerns, see, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Morton, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 5 , 458 F.2d 827, 833-837 (1972); see also, Greene County Planning Bd. v. Federal Power Comm., 455 F.2d 412 , 419 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 849 , 93 S.Ct. 56 , 34 L.Ed.2d 90 (1972)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Federal Power Commission
v.
Greene County Planning Board
v.
Greene County Planning Board
No. 71-1597.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.