green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.3 score
“the hearsay rule has no application where the question is whether certain things were said or written by a third person and not whether they are true.”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Reading Nursing Center v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
the hearsay rule has no application where the question is whether certain things were said or written by a third person and not whether they are true.
cited
Cited "see"
James Hinman v. United States
See Forrester v. United States, 456 F.2d 905 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 136 , 34 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip R. Balano
(2×)
See United States v. Archer, 455 F.2d 193, 194 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 135 , 34 L.Ed.2d 100 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Haklits v. Commonwealth
See Commonwealth v. Jacobs, 445 Pa. 364 , 284 A.2d 717 (1971), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Wayne Schwanke, Virgil Ernest Huggins, Olen Collins
See United States v. Archer, 455 F.2d 193 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 135 , 34 L.Ed.2d 100 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Malcolm Riffe
See United States v. Grene, 455 F.2d 376, 378 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 136 , 34 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972); United States v. Hall, 440 F.2d 1277, 1278 (5th Cir. 1971); United States v. Hunter, 417 F.2d 296, 297 (5th Cir. 1969); Potter v. United States, 304 F.2d 664, 666 (8th Cir. 1962). 1 Appellant is free to use other procedural devices to attack his conviction, though we intimate no conclusions regarding the merits of his claim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harms v. Godinez
See, also, United States v. Hampton, 457 F.2d 299, 303 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 136 , 34 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972); United States v. Crisp, 435 F.2d 354, 359 (7th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 1640 , 29 L.Ed.2d 116 (1971); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Edwards
See also United States v. Johnson, 455 F.2d 932 (5th Cir.1972), cert. den. 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 136 , 34 L.Ed.2d 101 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jerome Jackson
See, e. g., United States v. Hampton, 457 F.2d 299, 303 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 136 , 34 L.Ed.2d 101 ; United States v. Crisp, 435 F.2d 354, 359 (7th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 947 , 91 S.Ct. 1640 , 29 L.Ed.2d 116 (1971); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salvatore Cirami and James Cirami
See, e. g., United States v. Archer, 455 F.2d 193 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 135 , 34 L.Ed.2d 100 (1972); United States v. Colasurdo, supra. Despite this modern line of cases, uncertainty has persisted as to the propriety of withdrawing indictment language from a trial jury’s consideration because Bain , which “has never been disapproved,” Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212, 217 , 80 S.Ct. 270 , 4 L.Ed.2d 252 (1960), itself involved the withdrawal from the jury’s consideration of language not essential to the offense charged.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ross Joseph Strada
See also United States v. Johnson, 455 F.2d 932, 933 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 136 , 34 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ernesto Rodriguez Vallejo
See also United States v. Hampton, 457 F.2d 299 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 856 , 93 S.Ct. 136 , 34 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972); Giacalone v. Lucas, 445 F.2d 1238 (6th Cir. 1971); United States v. Leach, 429 F.2d 956 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 986 , 91 S.Ct. 1675 , 29 L.Ed.2d 151 (1970); United States ex rel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rhodes
v.
Haynes, Warden
v.
Haynes, Warden
No. 71-6511.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Published
Citer courts: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylv… (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.