green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gary Graves
Here the Government used a stipulation based on business record entries showing mailing and non-receipt in order to rely on the usual inference that “a letter properly mailed and never received by the addressee, but found in quite improper and misusing hands, can be found to have been stolen from the mails in the absence of any other explanation being preferred.” United States v. Hines, supra, 256 F.2d at 564 ; accord United States v. Lopez, 457 F.2d 396, 398 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 866 , 93 S.Ct. 162 , 34 L.Ed.2d 114 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Roglieri
(2×)
See United States v. Lopez, 457 F.2d 396, 398 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 866 , 93 S.Ct. 162 , 34 L.Ed.2d 114 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Aguiar
See United States v. Ellis, 461 F.2d 962 , 968 n.6 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 866 (1972); Wood v. Hodnett, 377 F. Supp. 740, 741 (W.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Easter v. State
See Carnathan v. State, 478 S.W.2d 490 (Tex.Cr.App.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 866 , 93 S.Ct. 160 , 34 L.Ed.2d 114 ; Johnson v. State, 502 S.W.2d 761 (Tex.Cr.App.1973); Brown v. State, 505 S.W.2d 850 (Tex.Cr.App.1974); Singletary v. State, 509 S.W.2d 572 (Tex.Cr.App.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dwight Timothy Scott, United States of America v. Rufus Williams, United States of America v. Ronnie Holloman, United States of America v. Marion C. Tucker
See United States v. Mitchell, 457 F.2d 513 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 866 , 93 S.Ct. 161 , 34 L.Ed.2d 114 (1972); United States v. Rose, 440 F.2d 832 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 838 , 92 S.Ct. 153 , 30 L.Ed.2d 71 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scott
See United States v. Mitchell, 457 F.2d 513 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 866 , 93 S.Ct. 161 , 34 L.Ed.2d 114 (1972); United States v. Rose, 440 F.2d 832 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 838 , 92 S.Ct. 153 , 30 L.Ed.2d 71 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blake v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Eremita v. State, 420 S.W.2d 609 (Tex.Crim.App.1967) (thirteen year old friend was not an accomplice to complainant’s sodomy even though friend had “similar experience” with defendant); Bowers v. State, 171 Tex.Crim. 345 , 350 S.W.2d 27 (1961) (minor friend of complaining witness was not accomplice even though she had "submitted” to defendant); Young v. State, 159 Tex.Crim. 302 , 263 S.W.2d 164 (1953) (juvenile friend of complaining witness was not accomplice even though he had "consented” to defendant’s sodomization of himself); see also Camathan v. State, 478 S.W.2d 49…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morland
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 71-6755.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.