green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Reasonable latitude in this area is important if nitpicking is not to become the name of the game.”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Walter T. Walker, III v. Action Industries, Inc. Amos Comay Sholom D. Comay Ernest S. Berez
But see Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 265 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972) (discouraging disclosure of soft information).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
D & N Financial Corp. v. RCM Partners Ltd. Partnership
reasonable latitude in this area is important if nitpicking is not to become the name of the game.
cited
Cited "see"
Lindner Fund, Inc. v. Polly Peck Int'l PLC
See Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis v. State
See Daly v. State , 47 Ala. App. 681 , 260 So.2d 412 (Ala.Cr.App. 1972), writ denied, Ex parte Daly , 288 Ala. 736 , 260 So.2d 418 (Ala. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 123 , 34 L.Ed.2d 127 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Field v. Trump
See Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 267 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972). 3.
cited
Cited "see"
Field v. Trump
See Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 267 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
McLean v. Alexander
Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 , 96 S.Ct. 1375 , 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976); see Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 271 (3d Cir.) (Adams, J., concurring), cert. denied 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Ex Rel. Schmidt v. LaVallee
See Miranda v. United States, 458 F.2d 1179, 1181 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 207 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972) where the court noted that defendant’s experienced defense lawyer found defendant to be rational and coherent.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand
The other exception occurs when the misrepresentation is contained in documents “prepared for or disseminated to the public or the stockholders.” Landy, supra, 486 F.2d at 170 ; see Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 269 (C.A. 3), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972); Dorfman v. First Boston Corp., 62 F.R.D. 466, 476-77 (E.D.Pa.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Duralite Co.
See Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir.) (Adams, J., concurring), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972); 3 Loss, Securities Regulations § 1766 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Duralite Company, Inc.
See Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir.) (Adams, J., concurring), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972); 3 Loss, Securities Regulations § 1766 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,897 Will L. Clegg v. Leo H. Conk
See Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 (1972), in which it was observed: “Stevens v. Vowell, 343 F.2d 374 (10th Cir. 1965), is yet another example of a court asserting that it is not necessary to allege common law fraud to recover damages under Section 10(b), although the facts demonstrate a situation where outright manipulation, or, indeed, actual fraud did exist.
cited
Cited "see"
Scott v. Multi-Amp Corporation
See Kolm v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 , 290 n. 47 (3d Cir.) (Adams, J., concurring and dissenting), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 (1972). 25 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Harnett v. Ryan Homes, Inc.
(2×)
F.R.Civ.P. 52(a); see Rochez Bros., Inc. v. Rhoades, 491 F.2d 402 at p. 408 (3d Cir. 1973) 18 Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite, 396 U.S. 375, 384 , 90 S.Ct. 616, 621 , 24 L.Ed.2d 593 (1970); see Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 269 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972) 19 List v. Fashion Park, Inc., 340 F.2d 457 , 462 (2d Cir.), cert.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harnett v. Ryan Homes, Inc.
Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite, 396 U.S. 375, 384 , 90 S.Ct. 616, 621 , 24 L.Ed.2d 593 (1970); see Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 , 269 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972). .
cited
Cited "see"
Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.
Accord, Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 288-91 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
de la Mata v. American Life Insurance
See also Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 302 (3d Cir.) (Adams, J., concurring and dissenting), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Cyanamid Co. v. Picaso-Anstalt
See, e.g., Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 302 (3rd Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 132, 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dick Gregory v. Larry D. Depte, Sandra L. Henderson and Correction Connection, Inc
(2×)
See also Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 262 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,800 New England Anti-Vivisection Society, Inc. v. United States Surgical Corporation, Inc.
Lessler, supra, 857 F.2d at 875 ; see also Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d *1204 255, 267 (3d Cir.) (“Reasonable latitude [in the area of proxy materials] is important if nit-picking is not to become the name of the game.”), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald Newsom Hasan Sharif Eddie J. McMillan and Donald Wolverton v. Steve Norris, Commissioner Michael Dutton, Warden and David Hindman
(2×)
Co. v. Columbian Equipment Co., 168 U.S. 627, 630 , 18 S.Ct. 240, 241 , 42 L.Ed. 605 (1898); Smith v. Vulcan Iron Works, 165 U.S. 518, 525 , 17 S.Ct. 407 , 41 L.Ed. 810 (1897); see also Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc. 458 F.2d 255, 262 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972); Allstate Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,601 South Coast Services Corp., a California Corporation v. Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972); Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., 398 F.2d 447 (10th Cir. 1968); Denison Mines, Ltd. v. Fibreboard Corp., 388 F.Supp. 812 (D.Del.1974); Madonick v. Denison Mines, Ltd., Fed.Sec.L.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Royal Bank of Canada v. Trentham Corp.
See, also, Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 303 (3rd Cir.) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972) (concurring and dissenting opinion of Judge Adams), where it was stated that in the absence of proof as to nonreciprocity, the court would assume that Zambia would grant reciprocity to judgments rendered by courts of the United States based on the reasoning that Zambia was a former British protectorate, that England granted reciprocity to United States courts’ judgments, and English decisions were authoritative precedents in Zambia.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Her Majesty Queen in Right of Province of British Columbia v. Gilbertson
See e. g., Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 303 (3d Cir. 1972) (Adams, J., dissenting), Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 ; Waxman v. Kealoha, 296 F.Supp. 1190, 1194 (D.Haw.1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia v. Gilbertson
See e. g., Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 303 (3d Cir. 1972) (Adams, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 ; Waxman v. Kealoha, 296 F.Supp. 1190, 1194 (D.Haw.1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Valente v. Pepsico, Inc.
(2×)
See, e. g., Kohn v. American Metal Climax, 458 F.2d 255, 265 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,512 Marvyn Gould, of the Estate of J. Donald Rogasner, in No. 75-1338. v. American-Hawaiian Steamship Company, Cross-Appellants
(2×)
See Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 1375 , 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976), in which the Supreme Court held that in an action for damages brought under section 10(b), scienter in the sense of an intent to deceive was the appropriate standard of liability; see also Judge Adams, concurring in Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 280, 290 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Denison Mines Limited v. Fibreboard Corporation
See e.g., Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3rd Cir. 1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972); Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., 478 F.2d 1281, 1291-1294 (2nd Cir. 1973); Sun Ray DX Oil Company v. Helmerick & Payne, Inc., 398 F.2d 447 , 450-451 (10th Cir. 1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McCray v. Beatty
See also Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
De Laval Turbine, Inc. v. West India Industries, Inc.
See, e.g., Andrews v. Chemical Carriers, Inc., 457 F.2d 636, 640 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 874 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jack Winter, Inc. v. Koratron Company, Inc.
See also Long Manufacturing Co. v. Lilliston Implement Co., 328 F.Supp. 268, 275-277 (E.D.N.C.1971), aff’d on other grounds, 457 F.2d 1317 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 119 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972), which holds the words “relatively large” and “relatively low” to be indefinite.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mercury Motor Express, Inc. v. Norman C. Brinke
A court of appeals normally will not consider the merits of a ease before it on an interlocutory appeal except to the extent necessary to decide narrowly the matter which supplies appellate jurisdiction, e. g., Time, Inc. v. Ragano, 5th Cir. 1970, 427 F.2d 219 , but this rule is one of orderly judicial administration and not a limit on jurisdictional power. “[O]nce a case is lawfully before a court of appeals, it does not lack power to do what plainly ought to be done.” 9 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 110.25 [1] (2d ed. 1972); see also Kohn v. American Metal Climix, Inc., 3rd Cir. 1971, 45…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kile
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 71-6915.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Published
Citer courts: D. Delaware (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.