green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.1 score
“reasonable latitude in this area is important if nitpicking is not to become the name of the game.”
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 45 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Walter T. Walker, III v. Action Industries, Inc. Amos Comay Sholom D. Comay Ernest S. Berez
But see Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 265 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972) (discouraging disclosure of soft information).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
D & N Financial Corp. v. RCM Partners Ltd. Partnership
reasonable latitude in this area is important if nitpicking is not to become the name of the game.
discussed
Cited "see"
First Union National Bank v. Steele Software Systems Corp.
(2×)
See Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publ'g Co., 30 N.Y.2d 34 , 330 N.Y.S.2d 329 , 281 N.E.2d 142, 144-45 (1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 125 , 34 L.Ed.2d 128 (1972)(licensees who agree to make "best efforts" to promote licensor's product are not restricted in promoting competing products). [14] See also Bloor, 601 F.2d at 614 (Falstaff Brewing could market its own beers and still fulfill promise to make best efforts to promote and market Ballentine beer); Farnsworth on Contracts, Supra, § 7.17c, at 388 ("courts agree ... that a duty of best efforts does not of …
discussed
Cited "see"
Archie Comic Publications, Inc. v. DeCarlo
Dutton, Inc., 112 F.R.D. 99, 104 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (Weinfeld, J.)); accord, (Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co., 30 N.Y.2d 34 , 330 N.Y.S.2d 329 , 281 N.E.2d 142 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 125 , 34 L.Ed.2d 128 (1972)); see also Liebowitz v. Elsevier Science Ltd., 927 F.Supp. 688, 711 (S.D.N.Y.1996). 30 . 698 F.Supp. 1154 . 31 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Desmond v. State Bank of Long Island (In Re Computer Engineering Associates, Inc.)
See Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co., 30 N.Y.2d 34, 45 , 330 N.Y.S.2d 329 , 281 N.E.2d 142 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 125 , 34 L.Ed.2d 128 (1972). 786 F.Supp. at 354 .
discussed
Cited "see"
US Airways Group, Inc. v. British Airways PLC
See Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co., 30 N.Y.2d 34, 45 , 330 N.Y.S.2d 329, 333 , 281 N.E.2d 142 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 125 , 34 L.Ed.2d 128 (1972); Travellers Int’l.
discussed
Cited "see"
Reuben H. Donnelley Corp. v. Mark I Marketing Corp.
See Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co., 33 A.D.2d 766, 766 , 306 N.Y.S.2d 599, 600 (N.Y.App.Div.1969), aff'd, 30 N.Y.2d 34 , 330 N.Y.S.2d 329 , 281 N.E.2d *290 142, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 125 , 34 L.Ed.2d 128 (1972) (writer/publisher relationship not fiduciary); Rodgers v. Roulette Records, 677 F.Supp. 731, 739 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (music artist/recording company relationship not fiduciary).
discussed
Cited "see"
Louisiana Pacific Corp. v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc.
See Honolulu Rapid Transit Co. v. Dolim, 459 F.2d 551, 553 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 124 , 34 L.Ed.2d 128 (1972) (“the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions does not strip state and federal governments of [the] indispensable and long acknowledged power [to conclude commercial bargains]).” Compromises of litigation, the Dolim Court said “pass[ ] out of the range of the Fifth Amendment” when “parties, supposedly with due regard to their own interests, bargain between themselves as to compensation.” Id.
cited
Cited "see"
Lindner Fund, Inc. v. Polly Peck Int'l PLC
See Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Bank of New York v. Sasson
See Van Valkenburgh, N. & N, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co., 30 N.Y.2d 34, 45 , 330 N.Y.S.2d 329 , 281 N.E.2d 142 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 125 , 34 L.Ed.2d 128 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Comcoa, Inc. v. NEC Telephones, Inc.
See Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co., 30 N.Y.2d 34 , 281 N.E.2d 142 , 330 N.Y.S.2d 329 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 125 , 34 L.Ed.2d 128 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Comcoa, Inc. v. Nec Telephones, Inc.
See Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co., 30 N.Y.2d 34 , 281 N.E.2d 142 , 330 N.Y.S.2d 329 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 125 , 34 L.Ed.2d 128 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Field v. Trump
See Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 267 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972). 3.
cited
Cited "see"
Field v. Trump
See Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 267 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sobol v. E.P. Dutton, Inc.
See Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Co., 33 A.D.2d 766 , 306 N.Y.S.2d 599 (per curiam), aff'd, 30 N.Y.2d 34 , 330 N.Y.S.2d 329 , 281 N.E.2d 142 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 125 , 34 L.Ed.2d 128 (1972). .
cited
Cited "see"
Robert K. Bell Enterprises, Inc. v. Tulsa County Fairgrounds Trust Authority
See Honolulu Rapid Transit Co. v. Dolim, 459 F.2d 551 (9th Cir.1972), cert. den. 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 124 , 34 L.Ed.2d 128 . 17 .
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Texas International Co.
See Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 265 (3d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 974 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 .
discussed
Cited "see"
McLean v. Alexander
Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185 , 96 S.Ct. 1375 , 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976); see Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 271 (3d Cir.) (Adams, J., concurring), cert. denied 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sharp v. Coopers & Lybrand
The other exception occurs when the misrepresentation is contained in documents “prepared for or disseminated to the public or the stockholders.” Landy, supra, 486 F.2d at 170 ; see Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 269 (C.A. 3), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972); Dorfman v. First Boston Corp., 62 F.R.D. 466, 476-77 (E.D.Pa.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Duralite Co.
See Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir.) (Adams, J., concurring), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972); 3 Loss, Securities Regulations § 1766 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Duralite Company, Inc.
See Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir.) (Adams, J., concurring), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972); 3 Loss, Securities Regulations § 1766 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Civil Aeronautics Board v. United Airlines, Inc.
See Burlington Northern, Inc. v. ICC, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 176 , 462 F.2d 280 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 (1972).
examined
Cited "see"
Harnett v. Ryan Homes, Inc.
(3×)
See note 15 infra 9 360 F.Supp. at 889 10 458 F.2d 255 , 269 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 814 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972) 11 340 F.2d 457 , 462 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965) Edward Ryan and Ryan Homes do not squarely meet Harnett's arguments that the district court's finding regarding the insubstantial nature of Edward Ryan's thoughts was erroneous and that the district court's conclusion that the omission was not material was incorrect.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harnett v. Ryan Homes, Inc.
(2×)
See note 15 infra. . 360 F.Supp. at 889 . . 458 F.2d 255 , 269 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 814 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972). . 340 F.2d 457 , 462 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 811 , 86 S.Ct. 23 , 15 L.Ed.2d 60 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brandon Darby v. the New York Times Company and James C. McKinley, Jr.
Compare Firestone v. Time, Inc., 460 F. 2d 712, 722-723 (CA5) (Bell, J., specially concurring), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 (1972), with Goldwater v. Ginzburg, 414 F. 2d 324, 341 (CA2 1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1049 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tilton v. Capital Cities/ABC Inc.
(2×)
Compare Firestone v. Time, Inc., 460 F.2d 712, 722-723 (5th Cir.) (Bell, J., specially concurring), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 127 (1972) and Buckley v. Littell, 539 F.2d 882, 889-90 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 , 97 S.Ct. 785 , 786, 50 L.Ed.2d 777 (1977) (expressing view that clear and convincing standard applies to issue of falsity) with Goldwater v. Ginzburg, 414 F.2d 324, 341 (2d Cir.1969), ce rt. denied 396 U.S. 1049 , 90 S.Ct. 701 , 24 L.Ed.2d 695 (1970) and Rattray v. City of National City, 36 F.3d 1480, 1487 (9th Cir.1994) (expressing view that…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
de la Mata v. American Life Insurance
See also Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 302 (3d Cir.) (Adams, J., concurring and dissenting), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Cyanamid Co. v. Picaso-Anstalt
See, e.g., Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 302 (3rd Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 132, 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dick Gregory v. Larry D. Depte, Sandra L. Henderson and Correction Connection, Inc
(2×)
See also Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 262 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald Newsom Hasan Sharif Eddie J. McMillan and Donald Wolverton v. Steve Norris, Commissioner Michael Dutton, Warden and David Hindman
(2×)
Co. v. Columbian Equipment Co., 168 U.S. 627, 630 , 18 S.Ct. 240, 241 , 42 L.Ed. 605 (1898); Smith v. Vulcan Iron Works, 165 U.S. 518, 525 , 17 S.Ct. 407 , 41 L.Ed. 810 (1897); see also Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc. 458 F.2d 255, 262 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972); Allstate Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton
(2×)
Compare Firestone v. Time, Inc., 460 F. 2d 712, 722-723 (CA5) (Bell, J., specially concurring), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 875 (1972), with Goldwater v. Ginzburg, 414 F. 2d 324, 341 (CA2 1969), cert. denied, 396 U. S. 1049 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rodgers v. Roulette Records, Inc.
As the Sanshoe court noted, “the mere fact that the proceeds from the sale of the footwear were collected and were to be distributed by the defendants and that the plaintiff is unaware of the exact amount to which he is entitled does not make the defendants fiduciaries.” Id.; see also Van Valkenburgh, Nooger & Neville, Inc. v. Hayden Publishing Company, 33 A.D.2d 766 , 306 N.Y.S.2d 599 (1st Dept.1969) (no fiduciary relationship where purely commercial relationship exists), aff'd 30 N.Y.2d 34 , 330 N.Y.S.2d 329 , 281 N.E.2d 142 (1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 125 , 34 L.Ed.2d 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William P. Tavoulareas, Peter Tavoulareas v. Philip Piro. William P. Tavoulareas, Peter Tavoulareas v. The Washington Post Company, D/B/A the Washington Post, a Delaware Corporation
(2×)
Compare Firestone v. Time, Inc., 460 F.2d 712, 722-23 (5th Cir.) (Bell, J., specially concurring) (expressing view that clear and convincing proof standard applies to issue of falsity vel non ), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 122 (1972) with Goldwater v. Ginzburg, 414 F.2d 324, 341 (2d Cir.1969) (expressing contrary view), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1049 , 90 S.Ct. 701 , 24 L.Ed.2d 695 (1970). 34 Tavoulareas also points to allegations in the Post article regarding possible SEC violations as false and defamatory.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tavoulareas v. Piro
(2×)
Compare Firestone v. Time, Inc., 460 F.2d 712, 722-23 (5th Cir.) (Bell, J., specially concurring) (expressing view that clear and convincing proof standard applies to issue of falsity vet non), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 122 (1972) with Goldwater v. Ginzburg, 414 F.2d 324, 341 (2d Cir.1969) (expressing contrary view), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1049 , 90 S.Ct. 701 , 24 L.Ed.2d 695 (1970). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Victor F. Orlowski
See also United States v. Engle, 458 F.2d 1017, 1020 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 122 , 34 L.Ed.2d 127 (1972); United States v. Lodwick, 410 F.2d 1202, 1204 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 841 , 90 S.Ct. 105 , 24 L.Ed.2d 92 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Simacek v. York County Rural Public Power District
(2×)
See, also, Franke v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, 479 S.W.2d 472 (Mo. 1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 875 , 93 S.Ct. 124 , 34 L.Ed.2d 128 (citing and explaining Union Elec. ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,601 South Coast Services Corp., a California Corporation v. Santa Ana Valley Irrigation Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972); Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., 398 F.2d 447 (10th Cir. 1968); Denison Mines, Ltd. v. Fibreboard Corp., 388 F.Supp. 812 (D.Del.1974); Madonick v. Denison Mines, Ltd., Fed.Sec.L.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Royal Bank of Canada v. Trentham Corp.
See, also, Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 303 (3rd Cir.) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972) (concurring and dissenting opinion of Judge Adams), where it was stated that in the absence of proof as to nonreciprocity, the court would assume that Zambia would grant reciprocity to judgments rendered by courts of the United States based on the reasoning that Zambia was a former British protectorate, that England granted reciprocity to United States courts’ judgments, and English decisions were authoritative precedents in Zambia.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Her Majesty Queen in Right of Province of British Columbia v. Gilbertson
See e. g., Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 303 (3d Cir. 1972) (Adams, J., dissenting), Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 ; Waxman v. Kealoha, 296 F.Supp. 1190, 1194 (D.Haw.1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia v. Gilbertson
See e. g., Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 303 (3d Cir. 1972) (Adams, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 ; Waxman v. Kealoha, 296 F.Supp. 1190, 1194 (D.Haw.1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Valente v. Pepsico, Inc.
(2×)
See, e. g., Kohn v. American Metal Climax, 458 F.2d 255, 265 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,512 Marvyn Gould, of the Estate of J. Donald Rogasner, in No. 75-1338. v. American-Hawaiian Steamship Company, Cross-Appellants
(2×)
See Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, - U.S. -, 96 S.Ct. 1375 , 47 L.Ed.2d 668 (1976), in which the Supreme Court held that in an action for damages brought under section 10(b), scienter in the sense of an intent to deceive was the appropriate standard of liability; see also Judge Adams, concurring in Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255, 280, 290 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Denison Mines Limited v. Fibreboard Corporation
See e.g., Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3rd Cir. 1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 126 (1972); Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., 478 F.2d 1281, 1291-1294 (2nd Cir. 1973); Sun Ray DX Oil Company v. Helmerick & Payne, Inc., 398 F.2d 447 , 450-451 (10th Cir. 1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McCray v. Beatty
See also Kohn v. American Metal Climax, Inc., 458 F.2d 255 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 874 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mercury Motor Express, Inc. v. Norman C. Brinke
A court of appeals normally will not consider the merits of a ease before it on an interlocutory appeal except to the extent necessary to decide narrowly the matter which supplies appellate jurisdiction, e. g., Time, Inc. v. Ragano, 5th Cir. 1970, 427 F.2d 219 , but this rule is one of orderly judicial administration and not a limit on jurisdictional power. “[O]nce a case is lawfully before a court of appeals, it does not lack power to do what plainly ought to be done.” 9 Moore’s Federal Practice ¶ 110.25 [1] (2d ed. 1972); see also Kohn v. American Metal Climix, Inc., 3rd Cir. 1971, 45…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Firestone
v.
Time, Inc.
v.
Time, Inc.
No. 72-7.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Delaware (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.