green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Daniel Robert Ryan v. Ohio Edison Company
But see United States v. Edwards, 458 F.2d 875, 880 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 (“Statutes like the federal mail fraud statute involved here must be strictly construed in order to avoid extension beyond the limits intended by Congress”). 9 .
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Richard H. Gens, United States of America v. Anthony W. Carleton, United States of America v. Richard T. Porter
But cf. United States v. Moraites, 456 F. 2d 435 , 441 & n. 9 (3d Cir.) (dictum), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 109 , 34 L.Ed. 2d 148 (1972) (suggesting that since the Britton decision the term “willfully misapplied” has acquired a technical meaning of its own).
cited
Cited "see"
Civil Aeronautics Board v. United Airlines, Inc.
See Burlington Northern, Inc. v. ICC, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 176 , 462 F.2d 280 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 120 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David P. Tokoph
See United States v. Moraites, 456 F.2d 435 (3rd Cir. 1972), cert. den’d, 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 109 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mandel
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Edwards, 458 F.2d 875, 880 (5th Cir.1972) cert. den. 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 . *591 According to the majority in Mandel I , Based upon the indictment and the record in this case, the Appellants could have been convicted of mail fraud only if one or more of the following schemes to defraud were proven: a scheme involving the bribery or attempted bribery of Governor Mandel; or, a scheme involving the fraudulent misrepresentation of facts to, or such concealment of true facts from, the Maryland General Assembly and the Maryland Racing Commission fo…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marvin Mandel, United States of America v. W. Dale Hess, United States of America v. Harry W. Rodgers, Iii, United States of America v. William A. Rodgers, United States of America v. Irvin Kovens, United States of America v. Ernest N. Cory, Jr., United States of America v. W. Dale Hess, Harry W. Rodgers, Iii, and William A. Rodgers
See, e. g., United States v. Edwards, 458 F.2d 875, 880 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. den., 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mandel
See, e. g., United States v. Edwards, 458 F.2d 875, 880 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. den., 409 U.S. 891 , 93 S.Ct. 118 , 34 L.Ed.2d 148 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Interstate Commerce Commission
v.
Burlington Northern, Inc.
v.
Burlington Northern, Inc.
No. 72-6.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Cer, Consideration, Tiorari, Took.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant cer-tiorari. Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.