green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard R. Gates v. Leonard Iljana
See id. at 878 and n. 3. 9 Gates' reliance on Maclin v. Paulson, 627 F.2d 83 (7th Cir.1980), Duncan v. Nelson, 466 F.2d 939 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 (1972), and Kerr v. City of Chicago, 424 F.2d 1134 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 833 (1970), is misplaced.
discussed
Cited "see"
Omar Blanco, Cross-Appellant v. Harry K. Singletary, as Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida, Cross-Appellee
United States v. Vasquez, 732 F.2d 846, 849 (11th Cir.1984); see United States v. Gradsky, 434 F.2d 880 (5th Cir.1970) (right to preserve does not extend to evidentiary hearing on suppression motion), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 203 , 34 L.Ed.2d 151 (1972). 154 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gonzalez v. Tilmer
See Duncan v. Nelson, 466 F.2d 939, 942 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 116 , 175, 34 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972) (police officers who coerced defendant’s confession were not proximate cause of the confession’s introduction in evidence at trial) (untenable to conclude that police officers would foresee that trial judge would erroneously admit unlawful confession); cf. Hensley v. Carey, 818 F.2d 646 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 965 , 108 S.Ct. 456 , 98 L.Ed.2d 395 (1987) (police officer conducting lineup not liable because defendant has no right to be free from an unduly sugg…
cited
Cited "see"
Strong v. Fairman
See Duncan v. Nelson, 466 F.2d 939, 941-42 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 175 , 34 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McDuffie
See United States v. Gradsky, 434 F.2d 880 (5th Cir.1970), cert denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 203 , 34 L.Ed.2d 151 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Wronke v. Marsh
See McCourt v. Culkin, 473 F.Supp. 1247 , 1250 n. 6 (E.D.Pa.1979) (citing Keister v. Resor, 462 F.2d 471 (3rd Cir.1972), cert. denied 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 116 , 34 L.Ed.2d 151 (1972)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Randall Edward Rex v. John P. Teeples, Donald E. Johnson, Jr., and Edward Rupert, Defendants
(2×)
See generally Duncan v. Nelson, 466 F.2d 939, 942 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 116 , 34 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972); Jackson v. Dillon, 518 F.Supp. 618, 622 (E.D.N.Y.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edith R. Suslick, of the Estate of Alvin Suslick, Deceased v. Rothschild Securities Corp.
See Duncan v. Nelson, 466 F.2d 939, 941 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 175 , 34 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972) (whether an applicable state statute has been tolled in a federal action is a matter governed by state law).
cited
Cited "see"
E. D. Systems Corporation v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
See Stapleton v. $2,438,110, 454 F.2d 1210 , 1214 (3d Cir. 1972) cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 11 , 34 L.Ed.2d 1151 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Jackson v. Dillon
See Duncan v. Nelson, 466 F.2d 939, 944 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 116 , 34 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Chrisco v. Shafran
See Duncan v. Nelson, 466 F.2d 939, 944 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 116 , 34 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
McCourt v. Culkin
See Keister v. Resor, 462 F.2d 471 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 116 , 34 L.Ed.2d 151 (1972); Hickey, supra. Therefore, the Secretary of the Navy did not violate the Navy regulation referred to by the plaintiff in his application to the BCNR.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hickey v. Commandant of the Fourth Naval District
See Keister v. Resor, 462 F.2d 471, 474-75 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 116 , 34 L.Ed.2d 151 (1972); O’Mar a v. Zebrowski, 447 F.2d 1085, 1089-90 (3d Cir. 1971); Nelson v. Miller, supra, 373 F.2d at 480 .
cited
Cited "see"
Saracena v. United States
See Stapleton v. Two Million Four Hundred Thirty-Eight Thousand, One Hundred and Ten Dollars, 454 F. 2d 1210 (3rd Cir.), cert denied, 409 U.S. 894 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Essington Metal Works, Inc. v. Retirement Plans of America, Inc.
See e.g., Stapleton v. $2,438,110, 454 F.2d 1210 (3d Cir.1972), cert, denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Soto v. City of Sacramento
See also Duncan v. Nelson, 466 F.2d 939, 942-43 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 175 , 34 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972) (defendant police officers, who allegedly elicited an involuntary confession from plaintiff resulting in his conviction on murder charges, were not the proximate cause of damages incurred as a result of his incarceration and conviction because it was unforeseeable that the trial judge would admit such inadmissible evidence); and Jackson v. Dillon, 518 F.Supp. 618, 622 (E.D.N.Y.1981) (assuming that defendant detective and police officer knowingly took plaintiff’s s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. Weatherby
Compare Duncan v. Nelson, 466 F.2d 939 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 116 , 34 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972) and Redmond v. Baxley, 475 F.Supp. 1111 (E.D.Mich.1979) with Comstock v. General Motors Corp., 358 Mich. 163 , 99 N.W.2d 627 (1959) and Raatikka v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp., 8 Mich.App. 638 , 155 N.W.2d 205 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hodges v. Brown
See also Keister v. Resor, 462 F.2d 471, 474-75 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 116 , 34 L.Ed.2d 151 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Russell B. Vinnedge v. G. W. Gibbs, Superintendent of Jails, Department of Corrections for the State of Virginia
Compare Thornton v. Buchmann, 392 F.2d 870 (7th Cir. 1968) and Allen v. Eicher, 295 F.Supp. 1184 (D.Md.1969), with Duncan v. Nelson, 466 F.2d 939 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. den. 409 U.S. 894 , 93 S.Ct. 116 , 34 L.Ed.2d 152 (1972), and Kerr v. Chicago, 424 F.2d 1134 (7th Cir. 1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stapleton
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 71-1546.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1972.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.