green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Graphic Packaging Corporation v. Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas And Ken Paxton, Attorney General of the State of Texas
See Kheel v. Port proposed placing a surcharge on bridge and tunnel of New York Authority, 331 F. Supp. 118 (SDNY 1971), tolls, with the extra revenues going to a special aff'd, 457 F. 2d 46 (CA2), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 983 fund to secure bonds for mass transportation (1972). projects.
discussed
Cited "see"
Boekemeier v. FOURTH UNIVER. SOCIETY IN CITY OF NY
See Kheel v. Port of New York Authority, 457 F.2d 46, 48 (2d Cir.1972)(citing McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178 , 56 S.Ct. 780 , 80 L.Ed. 1135 (1936)), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 983 , 93 S.Ct. 324 , 34 L.Ed.2d 248 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernard v. Gerber Food Products Co.
See generally Kheel v. Port of New York Authority, 457 F.2d 46 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 983 , 93 S.Ct. 324 , 34 L.Ed.2d 248 (1972); Cowan v. Windeyer, 795 F.Supp. 535, 537 (N.D.N.Y. 1992); Leslie v. BancTec Service Corp., 928 F.Supp. 341 , 348 n. 11 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (“When necessary, the Court will use the ‘plaintiffs viewpoint’ test.”) (citing Law Audit Servs., Inc. v. Studebaker Tech., Inc., 96 Civ. 0926, 1996 WL 137492 , *3 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Michael D. Tarbuck
See Kheel v. Port of New York Auth., 457 F.2d 46, 49 (2d Cir.) (“[T]he jurisdictional test is applicable to that amount that flows directly and with a fair degree of probability from the litigation, not from collateral or speculative sources.”), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 983 , 93 S.Ct. 324 , 34 L.Ed.2d 248 (1972); see also Healy v. Ratta, 292 U.S. 263, 267 , 54 S.Ct. 700, 702 , 78 L.Ed. 1248 (1934) (refusing to consider the collateral effects of the judgment on other *544 claims or other plaintiffs in determining the jurisdictional amount).
discussed
Cited "see"
Columbia Gas v. Tarbuck
See Kheel v. Port of New York Auth., 457 F.2d 46, 49 (2d Cir.) ("[T]he jurisdictional test is applicable to that amount that flows directly and with a fair degree of probability from the litigation, not from collateral or speculative sources."), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 983 (1972); see also Healy v. Ratta, 292 U.S. 263, 267 (1934) (refusing to consider the collateral effects of the judgment on other claims or other plaintiffs in determining the jurisdictional amount).
cited
Cited "see"
Bergstrom v. Burlington Northern Railroad
See Kheel v. Port of New York Authority, 457 F.2d 46 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 983 , 93 S.Ct. 324 , 34 L.Ed.2d 248 (1972). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Trust Co. of NY v. New Jersey
(2×)
See Kheel v. Port of New York Authority, 331 F. Supp. 118 (SDNY 1971), aff’d, 457 F. 2d 46 (CA2), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 983 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Haas v. 653 Leasing Co.
See Arvidson v. Dillingham Corp., 462 F.2d 1 , 3 n. 7 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 983 , 93 S.Ct. 321 , 34 L.Ed.2d 247 (1972). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pasquale Charles Marzano
(2×)
See United States v. Keefer, 464 F.2d 1385, 1386 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 983 , 93 S.Ct. 322 , 34 L.Ed.2d 247 ; United States v. Peskin, 527 F.2d 71, 82-83 (7th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cowan v. Windeyer
See, e.g., Kheel v. Port of New York Auth., 457 F.2d 46, 48-49 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 983 , 93 S.Ct. 324 , 34 L.Ed.2d 248 (1972); Myers v. Long Island Lighting Co., 623 F.Supp. 1076, 1078 (E.D.N.Y.1985) (citing St.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, (88-5195), (88-5484) v. Billy York Walker, (88-5195), (88-5484)
See also United States v. Portner, 462 F.2d 678 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 983 , 93 S.Ct. 319 , 34 L.Ed.2d 246 (1972); United States v. Hickey, 360 F.2d 127 (7th Cir.1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Philip R. Masters
See also United States v. Leviton, 193 F.2d 848, 851 (2d Cir. 1951), cert. denied, 343 U.S. 946 , 72 S.Ct. 860 , 96 L.Ed. 1350 (1952), where the court held that § 1001 should be broadly construed to apply to “false statements as might impede the ‘exercise of federal authority.’ ” See generally United States v. Parten, 462 F.2d 430, 432 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 983 , 93 S.Ct. 325 , 34 L.Ed.2d 248 (1972), where the court upheld convictions under § 1001 of two travel- *1121 lers re-entering the United States who had provided fictitious names.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ray McCarty and Genevieve McCarty v. Amoco Pipeline Company
See, e. g., Kheel v. Port of New York Authority, 457 F.2d 46 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 983 , 93 S.Ct. 324, 34 L.Ed.2d 248 (1972); Massachusetts State Pharmaceutical Ass’n v. Federal Prescription Service, 431 F.2d 130 (8th Cir. 1970); Alfonso v. Hillsborough County Aviation Authority, 308 F.2d 724 (5th Cir. 1962). 4 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Portner
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 72-297.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1972.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.