green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Colorado Springs v. 2354 INC.
(2×)
See California v. LaRue, 410 U.S. 948 , 93 S.Ct. 1351 , 35 L.Ed.2d 615 (1973); Marco Lounge, 625 P.2d at 987 . [19] Because live, nude dancing is conduct with an expressive element, it should technically be analyzed under the O'Brien test.
cited
Cited "see"
Jimbo's Hispanic Cafe, Inc. v. Arico, 93-6779 (1994)
See California v. LaRue, 409 U.S. 109 , 114-16, 93 S.Ct. 390 , 34 L.Ed.2d 342, 349-50 , veh. den. 410 U.S. 948 , 93 S.Ct. 1351 , 35 L.Ed.2d 615 (1972); C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nogueira
See, Ottomano v. United States, 468 F. 2d 269 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1128 , rehearing denied, 410 U.S. 948 (1973). 3 The photographs in dispute here fall clearly within the exclusion of Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Gordon, United States of America v. Joseph Daly
(2×)
See United States v. Clizer, 464 F.2d 121, 124 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1086 , 93 S.Ct. 697 , 34 L.Ed.2d 673 (1972), reh. denied, 410 U.S. 948 , 93 S.Ct. 1379 , 35 L.Ed.2d 616 (1973). 12 See also Steinert v. United States District Court for District of Nevada, 543 F.2d 69, 70 (9th Cir. 1976); United States v. Wuco, 535 F.2d 1200, 1202 (9th Cir. 1976); cert. denied, 429 U.S. 978 , 97 S.Ct. 488 , 50 L.Ed.2d 586 (1976); United States v. Clark, 416 F.2d 63, 64 (9th Cir. 1969), all of which are discussed in note 4, supra, and accompanying text.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nicholson v. Judicial Retirement & Removal Commission
See Napolitano v. Ward, 457 F.2d 279 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. den. 409 U.S. 1037 , 93 S.Ct. 512 , 34 L.Ed.2d 486 , reh. den. 410 U.S. 947 , 93 S.Ct. 1351 , 35 L.Ed.2d 616 ; In re Haggerty, 257 La. 1 , 241 So.2d 469 (1970); Sharpe v. State, 448 P.2d 301 (Okl.Jud.1968), cert. den. 394 U.S. 904 , 89 S.Ct. 1011 , 22 L.Ed.2d 216 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Provo City Corp. v. Willden
(2×)
Young v. American Mini-Theatres, 427 U.S. at 64 , 96 S.Ct. at 2449 , 49 L.Ed.2d at 322 ; see also California v. LaRue, 409 U.S. 109, 118 , 93 S.Ct. 390, 397 , 34 L.Ed.2d 342, 352 (1972), reh’g denied, 410 U.S. 948 , 93 S.Ct. 1351 , 35 L.Ed.2d 615 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California
v.
LaRue Ellingburg v. Goodson, Judge Gerace et vir v. County of Los Angeles Harsh Building Co. v. Bialac Sayles v. Nunzio Judges, Rigdon v. United States Carr v. Texas Clizer v. United States Szijarto v. Nelson, Warden Arnold v. Oliver, Judge Escofil v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Ritch v. Tarrant County Hospital District Champagne v. Penrod Drilling Co. and Ottomano v. United States
v.
LaRue Ellingburg v. Goodson, Judge Gerace et vir v. County of Los Angeles Harsh Building Co. v. Bialac Sayles v. Nunzio Judges, Rigdon v. United States Carr v. Texas Clizer v. United States Szijarto v. Nelson, Warden Arnold v. Oliver, Judge Escofil v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Ritch v. Tarrant County Hospital District Champagne v. Penrod Drilling Co. and Ottomano v. United States
No. 71-36; No. 71-6449; No. 72-388; No. 72-602; No. 72-5170; No. 72-5244; No. 72-5468; No. 72-5497; No. 72-5527; No. 72-5530; No. 72-5583; No. 72-5587; No. 72-5614; No. 72-5666.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1973.
Cited by 17 opinions | Published
Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar