green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
The El Paso Company, and El Paso Natural Gas Company v. The United States
(2×)
It had been included in that group throughout its existence. 8 . 410 U.S. at 962, 93 S.Ct. at 1440, 35 L.Ed.2d 697 . 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Rome v. United States
See ante, at 90. [4] In City of Petersburg v. United States, 354 F. Supp. 1021 (DC 1972), summarily aff'd 410 U. S. 962 (1973), the District Court did find that an annexation scheme could be prohibited solely on the basis of its disparate impact, without a finding of purposeful discrimination on the part of the local government.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wall v. Board of Elections
See City of Petersburg v. United States, 354 FSupp. 1021 (1972), affd. 410 U. S. 962 (93 SC 1441, 35 LE2d 698) (1973); City of Richmond v. United States, 422 U. S. 358 (95 SC 2296, 45 LE2d 245) (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United Jewish Organizations of Williamsburgh, Inc. v. Carey
(2×)
Accord, City of Petersburg v. United States, 354 F. Supp. 1021 (DC 1972), summarily aff’d, 410 U. S. 962 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Sun Oil Co.
(2×)
See United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., 358 F.Supp. 820 (D.Colo.1972), aff’d, 410 U.S. 962 , 93 S.Ct. 1440 , 35 L.Ed.2d 697 (1973). 22 . 15 U.S.C. § 717 (b); United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co., 381 U.S. 392 , 85 S.Ct. 1517 , 14 L.Ed.2d 466 (1965); Federal Power Commission v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., 381 U.S. 762 , 85 S.Ct. 1802 , 14 L.Ed.2d 714 (1965); Federal Power Commission v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co., 337 U.S. 498 , 69 S.Ct. 1251 , 93 L.Ed. 1499 (1949); Continental Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 370 F.2d 57 (5th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 9…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
(2×)
See also, United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., 358 F.Supp. 820 (D.Colo.1972), aff’d, 410 U.S. 962 , 93 S.Ct. 1440 , 35 L.Ed.2d 697 (1973), where the court upheld a reorganization whereby El Paso transferred all of its pipeline assets at net book value to a newly-formed company in exchange for the new company’s stock, then sold twenty percent of this stock, placed the remainder in a voting trust, and distributed participation certificates in the voting trust to El Paso shareholders, without any compensation between El Paso and the new company; and United States v. United Fruit Co., 195…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arizona ex rel. State Corporation Commission
v.
United States Southwest Gas Corp. v. United States Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. and El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. United States
v.
United States Southwest Gas Corp. v. United States Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co. and El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. United States
No. 72-768; No. 72-779; No. 72-781; No. 72-785.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 5, 1973.
Brennan, Cases, Consideration, Took, White.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Affirmed on appeals from D. C. Colo.
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.Reported below: 358 P. Supp. 820.