green
Positive treatment
6.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1973
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Rivera v. Trump Plaza Hotel & Casino
See Lansdale v. Tyler Junior College, 470 F.2d 659 (5th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2268 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); Massie v. Henry, 455 F.2d 779 (4th Cir.1972); Stull v. School Board of The W.
discussed
Cited "see"
Baxter v. Vigo County School Corporation
See Lansdale v. Tyler Junior College, 470 F.2d 659, 661 (5th Cir.1972) (involving junior college students), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2268 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); Gano v. School Dist. 411, 674 F.Supp. 796, 797 (D.Idaho) (involving high school student); Dodd v. Rambis, 535 F.Supp. 23, 24 (S.D.Ind.1981) (involving high school students). 7 31 In this case, Chelsie was in elementary school when her attempts at self-expression were blocked.
discussed
Cited "see"
Baxter ex rel. Baxter v. Vigo County School Corp.
See Lansdale v. Tyler Junior College, 470 F.2d 659, 661 (5th Cir.1972) (involving junior college students), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2268 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); Gano v. School Dist. 411, 674 F.Supp. 796, 797 (D.Idaho) (involving high school student); Dodd v. Rambis, 535 F.Supp. 23, 24 (S.D.Ind.1981) (involving high school students). 7 In this case, Chelsie was in elementary school when her attempts at self-expression were blocked.
cited
Cited "see"
X Corp. v. Doe
See Richardson v. Hamilton International Corp., 469 F.2d 1382, 1385 (3rd Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lesser v. Neosho County Community College
See Lansdale v. Tyler Jr. College, 470 F.2d 659, 663 (5th Cir.1972), cert. denied 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2268 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); Hander v. San Jacinto Jr. College, 519 F.2d 273, 276 (5th Cir.1975.) Although college students may have a generally recognized liberty interest in the control of their personal appearance, this court finds that no such interest is advanced under the particular facts this case.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Kelton Motors, Inc.
See, Richardson v. Hamilton International Corporation, 469 F.2d 1382, 1385 (3d.Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Highway Truck Drivers & Helpers Local Union 107
See Richardson v. Hamilton International Corp., 469 F.2d 1382 (3d Cir.1972) cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 5.Ct. 2271, 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); INA Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Rubin, 635 F.Supp. 1 (E.D.Pa.1983); Nalibotsky .
discussed
Cited "see"
Kaminski Bros. v. Detroit Diesel Allison, a Division of General Motors Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Richardson v. Hamilton International Corp., 469 F.2d 1382 (3d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Disqualification of Prosecutor Because of Former Representation
See Richardson v. Hamilton Int’l Corp., 469 F.2d 1382, 1385 (3d Cir. 1972), cert, denied, 411 U.S. 986 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
R.B. Williams v. Al C. Parke, Warden
(2×)
The appropriate constitutional inquiry asks whether “in its context and under all the circumstances” the Allen charge was “coercive.” Jenkins v. United States, 380 U.S. 445, 446 , 85 S.Ct. 1059, 1060 , 13 L.Ed.2d 957 (1965) (per curiam); see Jones v. Norvell, 472 F.2d 1185, 1186 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert, denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2275 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Trone v. Smith
See Richardson v. Hamilton International Corp., 469 F.2d 1382, 1385-86 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Trone v. Smith
See Richardson v. Hamilton International Corp., 469 F.2d 1382, 1385-86 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Messing v. FDI, Inc.
See Richardson v. Hamilton International Corp., 469 F.2d 1382, 1385-1386 (3rd Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); Estates Theatres, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, 345 F.Supp. 93, 98 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Roller Company v. William D. Budinger, an Individual Appeal of E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company
(2×)
See Richardson v. Hamilton Int'l Corp., 469 F.2d 1382 , 1383 fn. 1 (3rd Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); Greene v. Singer Co. (Civil No. 71-1835, 3d Cir. filed Nov. 2, 1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Groover v. Michelin North America, Inc.
See, e.g., Lansdale v. Tyler Junior College, 318 F.Supp. 529 (E.D.Tex.), aff'd on other grounds, 470 F.2d 659 (5th Cir.1972) (en banc), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2268 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); Sullivan v. Houston Independent School District, 307 F.Supp. 1328 (S.D.Tex.), vacated, 475 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1032 , 94 S.Ct. 461 , 38 L.Ed.2d 323 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Montoya v. Scott
(2×)
Compare Jones v. Norvell, 472 F.2d 1185, 1185-86 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2275 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973) (holding that state trial court coerced jury in part because it ascertained the jury's numerical division and how the majority voted) with Williams, 741 F.2d at 851 (holding that state trial court had not coerced jury and distinguishing Jones in part on grounds that court inquired as to jury's numerical division without asking how many jurors favored a guilty verdict); see also Cornell, 628 F.2d at 1048 (holding state trial court's inquiry into numerical …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barber v. Colorado Independent School District
(2×)
Compare Karr v. Schmidt, 460 F.2d 609, 611 (5th Cir.1972) (stating that a high school student’s “asserted right to be free of school regulations governing the length of his hair is one that is not cognizable in federal courts”), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 989 , 93 S.Ct. 307 , 34 L.Ed.2d 256 (1972), with Lansdale v. Tyler Junior College, 470 F.2d 659, 663 (5th Cir.1972) (en banc) (disapproving enforcement of a junior college’s grooming code and stating, “the place where the line of permissible hairstyle regulation is drawn is between the high school door and the college gate”), cert. de…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John C. Camel v. Dewey Sowders
United States v. Lash, 937 F.2d 1077, 1086 (6th Cir.1991); see also Jones v. Norvell, 472 F.2d 1185, 1186 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 (1973) (identification of jury's majority-minority count evidence of unfair trial). 29 Lash was a direct appeal from a conviction in a federal criminal trial, and we have rejected the proposition that reversal is necessarily mandated under facts comparable to those in Brasfield when state proceedings are being reviewed pursuant to a petition for habeas corpus.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena United States of America, Hana Koecher
See, e.g., United States v. Kahn, 471 F.2d 191, 194 (7 Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Corn Derivatives Antitrust Litigation (Mdl 414). Appeal of John E. Koerner & Co., Inc., Imperial Products Corporation, and Pan-O-Gold, Inc
(2×)
See e.g., Richardson v. Hamilton International Corp., 469 F.2d 1382, 1385-86 (3d Cir.1972), cert. den., 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Augustus Broome, United States of America v. James Lee Spoone, United States of America v. Billie K. Spoone
See also United States v. Kahn, 471 F.2d 191 (7th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973), rev'd on other grounds, 415 U.S. 143 , 94 S.Ct. 977 , 39 L.Ed.2d 225 (1974) ("Society has an interest in protecting the privacy of marriage because invasion of the privacy endangers the family relationship,” but "‘[w]here both spouses are substantial participants in patently illegal activity, even the most expansive of the marriage privileges should not prevent testimony.’ ” Id. at 194 (quoting Note, Future Crime or Tort Exception to Communications Privilege,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District
See, e.g., Lansdale v. Tyler Junior College, 318 F.Supp. 529 (E.D.Tex.), aff'd on other grounds, 470 F.2d 659 (5th Cir. 1972) (en banc), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2268 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); Sullivan v. Houston Independent School District, 307 F.Supp. 1328 (S.D.Tex.), vacated, 475 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1032 , 94 S.Ct. 461 , 38 L.Ed.2d 323 (1973); Nolop v. Volpe, 333 F.Supp. 1364 (D.S.D.1971); see also Foster v. Sparks, 506 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Horton ex rel. Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District
See, e.g., Lansdale v. Tyler Junior College, 318 F.Supp. 529 (E.D.Tex.), aff’d on other grounds, 470 F.2d 659 (5th Cir. 1972) (en banc), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2268 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); Sullivan v. Houston Independent School District, 307 F.Supp. 1328 (S.D.Tex.), vacated, 475 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1032 , 94 S.Ct. 461 , 38 L.Ed.2d 323 (1973); Nolop v. Volpe, 333 F.Supp. 1364 (D.S.D.1971); see also Foster v. Sparks, 506 F.2d 805 (5th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Horton ex rel. Horton v. Goose Creek Independent School District
See, e.g., Lansdale v. Tyler Junior College, E.D.Tex.1979, 318 F.Supp. 529 , aff’d on other grounds, 5 Cir. 1972, 470 F.2d 659 (en banc), cert. denied, 1973, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2268 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 ; Nolop v. Volpe, 1971 D.S.D., 333 F.Supp. 1364; Sullivan v. Houston Independent School District, S.D.Tex.1969, 307 F.Supp. 1328 , vacated on merits, 5 Cir. 1973, 475 F.2d 1071 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1032 , 94 S.Ct. 461 , 38 L.Ed.2d 323 ; see also Foster v. Sparks, 5 Cir. 1975, 506 F.2d 805 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
K & K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e. g., Hoffman v. Cement Masons Local 337, 468 F.2d 1187 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2269 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); American Bread Co. v. NLRB, 411 F.2d 147 (6th Cir. 1969); Honolulu Typographical Union No. 37 v. NLRB, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 1 , 401 F.2d 952 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Dredging Co. v. City of Philadelphia
(2×)
Furthermore “[wjhere a breach of ethics is made to appear, the relief is usually the granting of a motion to disqualify and remove the offending attorney.” Slater v. Rimar, Inc., supra, 462 Pa. at 149 , 338 A.2d at 589 ; See also Kramer v. Scientific Control Corp., 534 F.2d 1085 (3d Cir. 1976) (“ ‘A court may disqualify an attorney for not only acting improperly but also for failing to avoid the appearance of impropriety.’ Richardson v. Hamilton International Corp., 469 F.2d 1382 , 1385-86 & n. 12 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973)”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Cornell
(2×)
See also Jones v. Norvell, 472 F.2d 1185 (6 Cir.), cert. denied 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2275 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); United States v. Hayes, 446 F.2d 309 (5 Cir. 1971); Jacobs v. United States, 279 F.2d 826 (8 Cir. 1960).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
See also, Richardson v. Hamilton International Corporation, 469 F.2d 1382 (3d Cir.1972), ce rt. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973); Greene v. Singer, 461 F.2d 242 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 848 , 93 S.Ct. 54 , 34 L.Ed.2d 89 (1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Britton
See, also Commonwealth v. Lopinson, 427 Pa. 284, 300 , 234 A.2d 552, 562 (1967), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2269 , 36 L.Ed.2d 963 (1973).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson v. United States
See also Jones v. Norvell, 472 F.2d 1185 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2275 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cannon v. US Acoustics Corporation
See, e. g., Rule 11, Local Rules of United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, discussed in Richardson v. Hamilton Int’l Corp., 469 F.2d 1382 , *215 1384, & 1386 n. 12 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Silver Chrysler Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corporation and Chrysler Realty Corporation
(2×)
See also Richardson v. Hamilton International Corp., 469 F.2d 1382, 1386 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Handelman v. Weiss
See cases cited in note 4, supra; see also, Richardson v. Hamilton International Corporation, 469 F.2d 1382, 1385 (3d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 986 , 93 S.Ct. 2271 , 36 L.Ed.2d 964 (1973). 9 .
Pennsylvania
v.
Lopinson
v.
Lopinson
No. 72-1113.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 14, 1973.
Published
Sup. Ct. Pa. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.