green
Positive treatment
8.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Roper
In either case, intent to evade is an element of the offense. 2 “Issues cognizable on an appeal following a guilty plea are limited to issues based on ‘reasonable constitutional, jurisdictional, or other grounds going to the legality of the proceedings’ resulting in the plea.” (People v. DeVaughn (1977) 18 Cal.3d 889, 895 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 786 , 558 P.2d 872 ].) By pleading guilty, a defendant impliedly admits “that the People have established or can establish every element of the charged offense, thus obviating the need for the People to come forward with any evidence.” (People v. M…
discussed
Cited "see"
HOMESTEAD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. Holly Twp.
See Ganem v Ganem de Issa, 269 So 2d 740 (Fla App, 1972), cert den 277 So 2d 284 (Fla, 1973), cert den 414 US 1113 ; 94 S Ct 844 ; 38 L Ed 2d 740 (1973) (entry of summary judgment did not deny defendant due process where defendant was fully advised of the likelihood that his pleadings would be stricken and final judgment entered against him, yet failed to purge himself of various violations of court orders and made no other attempts to delay entry of orders of summary judgment).
discussed
Cited "see"
Byrd v. Armontrout
See Smith v. State of Mississippi, 478 F.2d 88 , 92 n. 6 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 844 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973). [9] Third, a federal habeas corpus petitioner's failure to properly pursue the state court remedies that were available for him to present his claim to the state courts (and which state court remedies he must exhaust because of the exhaustion doctrine) may result in a state procedural default which bars future state court consideration of the claim on its merits.
discussed
Cited "see"
Campbell v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University
(2×)
See Consolidated Data Terminals v. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 708 F.2d 385, 396 (9th Cir.1983). 49 Aluminum Co. of America v. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc., 337 F.Supp. 674 (N.D.Ill.1972), aff'd 486 F.2d 717 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 739 (1973) ("ALCOA"), does not help Campbell's cause.
discussed
Cited "see"
Twin Disc, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
See Triax Co. v. Hartman Metal Fabricators, Inc., 479 F.2d 951, 956-57 , 178 U.S. P.Q. 142 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973); In re Wright, 343 F.2d 761, 767 , 145 U.S.P.Q. 182 (CCPA 1965); Technicon Instruments Corp. v. Cole Instruments, Inc., 255 F.Supp. 630 , 150 U.S.P.Q. 227 (N.D.Ill. 1966), aff'd, 385 F.2d 391 , 155 U.S.P.Q. 369 (7th Cir.1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dolphin Tours, Inc. v. Pacifico Creative Service, Inc.
(2×)
See Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. McDonnell-Douglas Corp., 482 F.2d 1086, 1093 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Grogg v. General Motors Corp.
See Levin v. Mississippi River Corporation, 59 F.R.D. 353 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff’d, 486 F.2d 1398 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1112 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 739 (1973) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Eli Lilly and Company v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc., Federal Pharmacal, Inc., Seymour N. Blackman, Steven Blackman, John Blackman v. Richard D. Wood, C. Harvey Bradley, Jr., Earl B. Herr, Jr., Cornelius W. Pettinga, Eugene L. Step and Arthur R. Whale, Additional on the Counterclaim
(2×)
Accord, In re Khelghatian, 364 F.2d 870, 876 (C.C.P.A. 1966) 60 35 U.S.C. § 132 (1976) 61 479 F.2d 951 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973) 62 Id. at 956-57 (citations omitted) 63 In re Papesch, 315 F.2d at 391 64 Cf: In re Davies, 475 F.2d 667, 672 (C.C.P.A. 1973) (affirming Patent Office's refusal to consider previously undisclosed unexpected properties, but authorizing refiling of application to incorporate such properties): Since the subject matter to be claimed in a subsequently filed application would be identical to that claimed here, the later …
discussed
Cited "see"
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Premo Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Inc.
(2×)
Accord, In re Khelghatian, 364 F.2d 870, 876 (C.C.P.A. 1966). . 35 U.S.C. § 132 (1976). . 479 F.2d 951 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hotel & Restaurant Employees And Bartenders International Union v. Kay Rollison
(2×)
See Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. McDonnell-Douglas Corp., 482 F.2d 1086, 1093 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
James Walter Cherry v. Director, State Board of Corrections
(2×)
Accord, Smith v. Mississippi, 478 F.2d 88, 95 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 844 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders International Union v. Rollison
(2×)
See Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. McDonnell-Douglas Corp., 482 F.2d 1086, 1093 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Safe Flight Instrument Corporation, a New York Corporation v. United Control Corporation, a Delaware Corporation and Uc Liquidating Corporation, a Washington Corporation, Safe Flight Instrument Corporation, a New York Corporation v. United Control Corporation, a Delaware Corporation and Uc Liquidating Corporation, a Washington Corporation
(2×)
See Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. McDonnell-Douglas Corp., 482 F.2d 1086, 1088 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973) 2 In addition, plaintiff agreed to pay defendants $1.5 million for the going business of defendants in the infringing devices 3 Rule 60(b) provides in pertinent part: "On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: . . . (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon wh…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Starling
In United States v. Jorn, 400 U.S. 470 , 91 S.Ct. 547 , 27 L.Ed.2d 543 (1971), the Court stated: In the absence of . . .a motion [for mistrial on behalf of the accused], the Perez doctrine of manifest necessity stands as a command to trial judges not to foreclose the defendant’s option [to proceed to verdict] until a scrupulous exercise of judicial discretion leads to the conclusion that the ends of justice would not be served by a continuation of the proceedings. *941 Id. at 485, 91 S.Ct. at 557 (emphasis added); see Smith v. Mississippi, 478 F.2d 88, 96 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. United Control Corp.
(2×)
See Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. McDonnell-Douglas Corp., 482 F.2d 1086, 1088 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973). .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Goad
See State v. McLennan, 503 S.W.2d 909 (Tenn.1973), cert. den. 414 U.S. 1112 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 739 ; Wilson v. Porter, 361 F.2d 412, 15 (9th Cir.1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Anderson
See United States v. Moon, 491 F.2d 1047, 1049 (5th Cir. 1974), and Smith v. Mississippi, 478 F.2d 88, 94 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 844 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Supreme Equipment & Systems Corp. v. Lear Siegler, Inc. And Nat Levenberg
(2×)
See Triax Co. v. Hartman Metal Fabricators, Inc., 479 F.2d 951, 955 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Tennessee v. Charlotte Yvonne Turner
State v. Goad, 549 S.W.2d 377, 379 (Tenn. 1977) (quoting Wilson v. Porter, 361 F.2d 412, 415 (9th Cir. 1966)); see also State v. McLennan, 503 S.W.2d 909, 911 (Tenn. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1112 , 94 S. Ct. 843 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mashburn v. National Healthcare, Inc.
See, e.g., Levin v. Mississippi River Corp., 59 F.R.D. 353, 363 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff'd sub nom., Wesson v. Mississippi River Corp., 486 F.2d 1398 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1112 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 739 (1973); H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Southern Pacific Communications Company v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company
(2×)
See also Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. McDonnell-Douglas Corp., 482 F.2d 1086, 1089 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1113 , 94 S.Ct. 843 , 38 L.Ed.2d 740 (1973); Grantham v. McGraw-Edison Co., supra, 444 F.2d at 216-17 ; Donald v. J.J.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Admiral-Merchants Motor Freight, Inc.
v.
Aluminum Company of America
v.
Aluminum Company of America
No. 73-669.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 17, 1973.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.