green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[I]t seems highly unlikely that [the Couch Court] was viewing the term as broadly as courts have done in other contexts.... ”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“the person claiming the attorney-client privilege has the burden of establishing all essential elements”
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (Abc, Inc.)
t seems highly unlikely that was viewing the term as broadly as courts have done in other contexts....
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Breon v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
the person claiming the attorney-client privilege has the burden of establishing all essential elements
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Allergan PLC Securities Litigation
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir. 1973) (“subsequent disclosure to a third party by the party of a communication with his attorney eliminates whatever privilege the communication may have originally possessed”), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kadem
Pollard v. Galaza, 290 F.3d 1030, 1033 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 981 , 123 S.Ct. 449 , 154 L.Ed.2d 343 (2002) (“Although a statement, taken in violation of Miranda, may not be used substantively in the prosecution’s case-in-chief, such a statement, if voluntary, may be used for impeachment should the Defendant testify inconsistently”) (citing Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222, 224-26 , 91 S.Ct. 643 , 28 L.Ed.2d 1 (1971)); accord United States ex rel. *243 Wright v. LaVallee, 471 F.2d 123, 126-27 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 167 , 38 L.Ed.2d 87 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gorman v. Polar Electro, Inc.
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States Postal Service v. Phelps Dodge Refining Corp., 852 F.Supp. 156 , 159 (E.D.N.Y.1994).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Schubert
See In re Horowitz, 482 F. 2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.1973), cert. den. 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 86 (1973); Sew'n Sweep, Inc. v. Swiss-Bernina, Inc., 91 F.R.D. 254, 258-259 (N.D.Ill. 1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Duttle v. Bandler & Kass
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 921 (2d Cir.1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Minpeco, S.A. v. Conticommodity Services, Inc.
See Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Co., 475 F.2d 1112, 1116-17 (3d Cir.) (directed verdict for antitrust defendant where plaintiffs failed to produce “the relevant cost figures essential to establish net profit” and thus “did not meet their burden of establishing the quantum of damages”), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); Filmline (Cross-Country) Productions, Inc. v. United Artists Corp., 662 F.Supp. 798, 813 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (plaintiff required to prove offsetting costs saved by reason of defendant’s wrongful conduct).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Nackson
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973) [rehearing den. 414 U.S. 1052 , 94 S.Ct. 556 , 38 L.Ed. 2d 340 (1973)].
discussed
Cited "see"
von Bulow ex rel. Auersperg v. von Bulow
Moreover, “[ejvidentiary privileges in litigation are not favored and even those rooted in the Constitution must give way in proper circumstances.” Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 175 , 99 S.Ct. 1635, 1648 , 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979); accord In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Von BULOW BY AUERSPERG v. Von Bulow
Moreover, "[e]videntiary privileges in litigation are not favored and even those rooted in the Constitution must give way in proper circumstances." Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 175 , 99 S.Ct. 1635, 1648 , 60 L.Ed.2d 115 (1979); accord In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States
United States v. Bein, 728 F.2d 107 at 112 (2d Cir.1984) (quoting United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 921 (2d Cir.1961)); accord In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 80-81 n. 7 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bernard P. Elkin, A/K/A \Bob Elkin
See United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 921 (2d Cir.1961); accord In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 80-81 n. 7 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Calvin Bein, Thomas Deangelis, Albert Vitti, and Arthur Billups
United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 921 (2d Cir.1961); accord In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 80-81 n. 7 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Kresky Enterprises Corporation v. Magid
See Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Co., 475 F.2d 1112, 1116 (3d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Danny Kresky Enterprises Corp. v. Magid
See Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Co., 475 F.2d 1112, 1116 (3d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Multiflex, Inc. v. Samuel Moore & Company, and Eaton Corporation
See Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Co., 475 F.2d 1112, 1116-17 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven v. Hershenow, Stuart M. Rosenthal, Steven A. Shraiar
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 87 n.20 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Silvestain
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 86 n.19 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Jones, 630 F.2d 1073, 1076-80 (5th Cir. 1980); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 520 F.2d 904, 906-07 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 778 , 46 L.Ed.2d 639 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Silvestain
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 86 n.19 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Jones, 630 F.2d 1073, 1076-80 (5th Cir. 1980); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 520 F.2d 904, 906-07 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1050 , 96 S.Ct. 778 , 46 L.Ed.2d 639 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
See, Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Company, 475 F.2d 1112 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pocahontas Supreme Coal Co. v. National Mines Corp.
Long Island Lighting Co. v. Standard Oil Co. of California, 521 F.2d 1269, 1274 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1073 , 96 S.Ct. 855 , 47 L.Ed.2d 83 (1976); accord, Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Co., 475 F.2d 1112, 1115 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Robert M. McCoy and Charles Sussman
See generally, In re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon Horowitz, 2 Cir. 1973, 482 F.2d 72, 75-79 , cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Acmat Corp. v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 478
See International Wire v. Local 38, IBEW, 475 F.2d 1078 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 63 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); Paramount Transport Systems v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers, Local 150, 436 F.2d 1064 (9th Cir. 1971); Painters District Council No. 38 v. Edgewood Contracting Co., 416 F.2d 1081 (5th Cir. 1969); Whitman Electric Inc. v. Local 363, IBEW, 398 F.Supp. 1218 (S.D.N.Y.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
American Medicorp, Inc. v. Humana, Inc.
See Deaktor v. Fox Groceries, 475 F.2d 1112 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
Nita B. Pogue v. International Industries, Inc., (Two Cases)
See Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Co., 475 F.2d 1112, 1116-17 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Stolar
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum, Etc.
See In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973) ; Schwimmer v. United States, supra, 232 F.2d at p. 863 ; In re Morgan, supra, 377 F.Supp. at p. 285 ; In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 203 F.Supp. 575, 579 (S.D.N.Y.1961).
cited
Cited "see"
Sipe v. Local Union No. 191 United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners
See Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Co., W.D.Pa.1971, 332 F.Supp. 536 , aff’d 3 Cir. 1973, 475 F.2d 1112 , cert. denied 1973, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fisher
See Judge Friendly's scholarly treatment in In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 75-79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973), and in The Fifth Amendment Tomorrow: The Case for Constitutional Change, 37 U.Cin.L.Rev. 671, 701-703 (1968) 11 Corporate and union records and records of at least certain partnerships actually possessed by the custodians in a representative rather than a personal capacity cannot be the subject of the personal privilege against self-incrimination.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fisher
See Judge Friendly’s scholarly treatment in In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 75-79 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973), and in The Fifth Amendment Tomorrow: The Case for Constitutional Change, 37 U.Cin.L.Rev. 671, 701-703 (1968). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MacKenzie-Childs LLC v. MacKenzie-Childs
See also In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2d Cir.) (since the attorney-client privilege “stands in derogation of the public’s right to every man’s evidence, ... it ought to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle”) (internal citations and quotations omitted), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Stewart, 2002 WL 1300059 , *5 (S.D.N.Y.2002) (because attorney-client privilege is rooted in policy, not the constitution, it “cannot stand in the face of countervailing law or strong pub…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aktiebolag v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The party claiming the benefit of the attorney-client privilege has the burden of establishing all essential elements. von Bulow v. von Bulow, 811 F.2d 136, 144 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987); see, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fletcher v. Atex, Inc.
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 reh. denied, 414 U.S. 1052 , 94 S.Ct. 556 , 38 L.Ed.2d 340 (1973); United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 923 (2d Cir.1961); Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp., 150 F.R.D. 465, 470 (S.D.N.Y.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 923 (2d Cir.1961); In re Minebea Co., 143 F.R.D. 494, 503 (S.D.N.Y.1992); Martin v. Valley Nat’l Bank, 140 F.R.D. 291, 302 (S.D.N.Y.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Golden Trade v. Lee Apparel Co.
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d at 923 ; Martin v. Valley Nat’l Bank, 140 F.R.D. at 302.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin v. Valley National Bank
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918, 923 (2d Cir.1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated May 9, 1990
See also In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 85 (2d Cir.1973) (“[N]o Supreme Court decision has upheld a Fifth Amendment claim predicated solely, or even primarily, on the basis of an invasion of privacy...."), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973). 23 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Sealed Case
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 82 n. 10 (2d Cir.) (discussing debate), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 [ 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 ] (1973); Burke v. New York City Police Department, 115 F.R.D. 220 , 231 n. 8 (S.D.N.Y.1987); Apex Oil Company v. DiMauro, 110 F.R.D. 490 , 493-94 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1985); Gulf Oil Corporation v. Schlesinger, 465 F.Supp. 913, 916 (E.D.Penn.1979). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Burke v. New York City Police Department
See, e.g., In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); Apex Oil Co. v. DiMauro, 110 F.R.D. 490 , 493-94 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1985). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LONE STAR STEEL COMPANY v. United Mine Workers of America
See, e.g., Int'l Wire v. Local 38, Int’l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 475 F.2d 1078 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 63 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 ; Amcat Corp. v. Int'l Union of Operating Engineers, 442 F.Supp. 772 (D.Conn.1977). 12 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
O'Leary v. Purcell Co.
See also, In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2nd Cir.), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,487, 15 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 428 in Re Grand Jury Proceedings
See also, In Re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973) in which Judge Friendly declared: "It is not asking too much to insist that if a client wishes to preserve the privilege under such circumstances, he must take some affirmative action to preserve confidentiality," adding in a footnote: "Taking or failing to take precautions may be considered as bearing on intent" to preserve confidentiality.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Grand Jury Proceedings
See also, In Re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 82 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973) in which Judge Friendly declared: “It is not asking too much to insist that if a client wishes to preserve the privilege under such circumstances, he must take some affirmative action to preserve confidentiality,” adding in a footnote: “Taking or failing to take precautions may be considered as bearing on intent” to preserve confidentiality.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wickham Contracting Co., Inc. v. The Board Of Education Of The City Of New York
See, e.g., Consolidated Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Association, Inc., 602 F.2d 494 (3d Cir.1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 3040 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1131 (1980), International Wire v. Local 38, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 475 F.2d 1078 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 63 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973), Texaco, Inc. v. Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons, 472 F.2d 594 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1091 , 94 S.Ct. 721 , 38 L.Ed.2d 548 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wickham Contracting Co. v. Board of Education
See, e.g., Consolidated Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Association, Inc., 602 F.2d 494 (3d Cir. 1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 3040 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1131 (1980), International Wire v. Local 38, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, 475 F.2d 1078 (6th Cir.1973), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 63 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973), Texaco, Inc. v. Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons, 472 F.2d 594 (5th Cir.1973), cert, denied, 414 U.S. 1091 , 94 S.Ct. 721 , 38 L.Ed.2d 548 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
See, e. g., International Wire v. Local 38, *639 IBEW, 475 F.2d 1078 (6th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 63 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); Paramount Transport Systems v. Chauffeurs, Local 150, 436 F.2d 1064 (9th Cir. 1971) (per curiam).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Grand Jury Empanelled February 14, 1978. Appeal of United States of America
See also In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72 , 86-87 & nn. 19 & 20 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 26 (1973). 41 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
PAAC v. Rizzo
See also Deaktor v. Fox Grocery Co., 475 F.2d 1112, 1115-1116, n.2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 65 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
International Wire
v.
Local 38, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
v.
Local 38, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
No. 72-1707.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1973.
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.