green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1989 ·
…t would not be unreasonable to assume that a man believed to be the one of the top narcotics violators in the new york area would be carrying arms or would be otherwise violent.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Joel Torres Salas, United States of America v. Vincente Flores Munoz
(2×)
t would not be unreasonable to assume that a man believed to be the one of the top narcotics violators in the new york area would be carrying arms or would be otherwise violent.
cited
Cited "see"
Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. United States of America, Defendant-Third Party v. Mt. Vernon Township High School District 201, Third Party
See Avco Delta Corp. Canada Ltd. v. United States, 484 F.2d 692 (7th Cir.1973), certiorari denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974); 26 U.S.C. § 6321 .
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Hendleman
See, Avco Delta Corp. Canada Ltd. v. United States, 484 F.2d 692 (7th Cir.1973), cert. denied Canadian Parkhill Pipe Stringing Ltd. v. United States, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974), appeal after remand, 540 F.2d 258 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1040 , 97 S.Ct. 739 , 50 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
National Petrochemical Co. of Iran v. M/T Stolt Sheaf
See Federal Republic of Germany v. Elicofon, 358 F.Supp. 747, 756-57 (E.D.N.Y.1972), aff'd, 478 F.2d 231 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1443 , 39 L.Ed.2d 489 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Ray Glasser, Leonard Steven Gaza, Arthur Blair Erdlen, Daniel Lee Tomko. Appeal of Leonard Steven Gaza in No. 83-5909. United States of America v. Robert Ray Glasser, Leonard Steven Gaza, Arthur Blair Erdlen, Daniel Lee Tomko. Appeal of Arthur Blair Erdlen in No. 83-5929
See United States v. Martinez, 481 F.2d 214, 221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 489 (1973).Conclusion 58 In view of the foregoing, it is the holding of this Court that: (1) the border search of the packages mailed from Jamaica was authorized by 19 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Glasser
See United States v. Martinez, 481 F.2d 214, 221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 489 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williard, Inc. v. Powertherm Corp.
See Avco Delta Corporation Canada Ltd. v. United States, 484 F.2d 692 , 699-701 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974); United States v. Chapman, 281 F.2d 862 (10th Cir. 1960); Van Etten v. New York State Natural Gas Corp., 192 F.Supp. 837 (M.D.Pa.1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent and Barbara Liberti, Movants-Appellees
(2×)
See United States v. Santana, 485 F.2d 365 , 369 n.8 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974). 10 For example, Justice Stewart carefully pointed out that Coolidge did not involve contraband or stolen goods. 403 U.S. at 472 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Duluth Lumber & Plywood Co. v. Delta Development, Inc.
See, Avco Delta Corp. v. Canada Ltd., 484 F.2d 692 (7 Cir. 1973), certiorari denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974), second appeal, 540 F.2d 258 (7 Cir. 1976); Framingham Trust Co. v. Gould-National Batteries, Inc., 427 F.2d 856 (1 Cir. 1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Trans-Bay Engineers and Builders, Inc. v. Carla A. Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development
See Avco Delta Corporation Canada LTD v. United States, 484 F.2d 692 , 701-04 (7th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Jose Gil Ojeda-Vinales v. The Immigration and Naturalization Service
See United States v. Santana, 485 F.2d 365, 368 (2 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Colon
Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119 , 120 S.Ct. 673, 676 , 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000) (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1946)); accord United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 7 , 109 S.Ct. 1581 , 104 L.Ed.2d 1 (1989) (same); see also United States v. Santana, 485 F.2d 365, 368 (2d Cir.1973) (test for reasonable suspicion is "rather lenient”), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wolfenbarger v. Williams
United States v. Cushnie, 488 F.2d 81 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 968 , 95 S.Ct. 233 , 42 L.Ed.2d 184 (1974); see, e.g., United States v. Santana, 485 F.2d 365 , (2nd Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974); United States v. Gray, 484 F.2d 352 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1158 , 94 S.Ct. 916 , 39 L.Ed.2d 110 (1974) 3 The defendants did not raise an argument regarding this language in Coolidge in the district court or in their appellate brief.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wolfenbarger v. Williams
United States v. Cushnie, 488 F.2d 81 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 968 , 95 S.Ct. 233 , 42 L.Ed.2d 184 (1974); see, e.g., United States v. Santana, 485 F.2d 365 , (2nd Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974); United States v. Gray, 484 F.2d 352 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1158 , 94 S.Ct. 916 , 39 L.Ed.2d 110 (1974). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Martin Niver, Wayelon Howard Penland and Stanley Charles McCune
See, e.g., United States v. Martinez, 481 F.2d 214 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 489 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raymond Richards
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Martinez, 481 F.2d 214, 218-19 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 489 (1974) (35 minute break in surveillance held insufficient to establish changed circumstances in view of the fact that it took the authorities two hours to unload the 628 pounds of marijuana hidden in a secret compartment of a truck).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Orlando Vasquez, Carlos Sanchez, Fernando Eugenio Medina, Amparo Valencia Medina, Clara Inez Mesa and Hernando Mesa
See, e. g., United States v. Santana, 485 F.2d 365 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Victor Rosario
(2×)
See also United States v. Santana, 485 F.2d 365 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 , 94 S.Ct. 1444 , 39 L.Ed.2d 490 (1974); 5 United States v. Baltazar, 477 F.Supp. 236 (E.D.N.Y.1979). 6 20 This question has also been addressed by the courts of New York State, where a consistent line of cases hold that the mere observation of the passing of glassine envelopes (even though they are a "telltale" sign of a narcotics transfer) is insufficient to establish probable cause.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People Ex Rel. Sorenson v. Randolph
Then, ‘[the] government regulation is sufficiently justified if it is within the constitutional power of the Government; if it furthers an important or substantial governmental interest; if the governmental interest is unrelated to the suppression of free expression; and if the incidental restriction on alleged First Amendment freedoms is no greater than is essential to the furtherance of that interest.’ (United States v. O’Brien (1968) 391 U. S. 367, 377 .. .; see also Crownover v. Music (1973) Cal.3d 405, 422-423..., cert. den., 415 U.S. 931 ... [11] The governmental interest in preven…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People Ex Rel. Van De Kamp v. American Art Enterprises, Inc.
(2×)
Then, “[the] government regulation is sufficiently justified if it is within the constitutional power of the Government; if it furthers an important or substantial governmental interest; if the governmental interest is unrelated to the suppression of free expression; and if the incidental restriction on alleged First Amendment freedoms is no greater than is essential to the furtherance of that interest.” (United States v. O’Brien (1968) 391 U.S. 367, 377 [ 20 L.Ed.2d 672, 680 , 88 S.Ct. 1673 ]; see also Crownover v. Musick (1973) 9 Cal.3d 405, 422-423 [ 107 Cal.Rptr. 681 , 509 P.2d 497 ]…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. James
See, e.g., United States v. Martinez, 481 F.2d 214, 221 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931 ; United States v. DelToro, 426 F.2d 181, 183 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 829 ; Stewart v. United States, 325 F.2d 745, 746 (8th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 937 ; State v. White, 254 La. 389 , 223 So. 2d 843, 845 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Semel
v.
Federal Supply Co.
v.
Federal Supply Co.
No. 73-265.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1974.
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.