Stone & Webster Eng'g Corp. v. Virginia Elec. & Power Co., 415 U.S. 935 (1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Stone & Webster Eng'g Corp. v. Virginia Elec. & Power Co., 415 U.S. 935 (1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1978 · …democratic central committee i ⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1978 · …democratic central committee ii ⚠ not in text
174 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 65 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Southwestern Bell Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ameritech Operating Companies, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, United States Telephone Association, National Association of Regulatory Commissioners, U.S. West, Inc., Gte Telephone Operating Companies, Western Union Corporation, Centel Corporation, National Cable Television Association, Independent Data Communications Manufacturers Association, North American Telecommunications Association, New York Telephone Company, Bellsouth Corporation, International Business MacHines Corporation, Contel Corporation, State of Michigan, Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, Intervenors. Gte Service Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ameritech Operating Companies, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, United States Telephone Association, United Telephone System Companies, Bellsouth Corporation, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, New York Telephone Company, Contel Corporation, U.S. West, Inc., Pacific Telesis Group, International Business MacHines Corporation, Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee (cadc, 1990-03-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Southwestern Bell Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ameritech Operating Companies, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, United States Telephone Association, National Association of Regulatory Commissioners, U.S. West, Inc., Gte Telephone Operating Companies, Western Union Corporation, Centel Corporation, National Cable Television Association, Independent Data Communications Manufacturers Association, North American Telecommunications Association, New York Telephone Company, Bellsouth Corporation, International Business MacHines Corporation, Contel Corporation, State of Michigan, Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee, Intervenors. Gte Service Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Ameritech Operating Companies, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, United States Telephone Association, United Telephone System Companies, Bellsouth Corporation, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, New York Telephone Company, Contel Corporation, U.S. West, Inc., Pacific Telesis Group, International Business MacHines Corporation, Ad Hoc Telecommunications Users Committee
D.C. Cir. · 1990 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
democratic central committee
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Southwestern Bell Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1990 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
democratic central committee
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) AT & T Information Systems, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1988 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
democratic central
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) At & T Information Systems, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
D.C. Cir. · 1988 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
democratic central
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Washington Public Interest Organization v. Public Service Commission (4×)
D.C. · 1978 · quote attribution · 4 verbatim quotes · confidence low
democratic central committee ii
discussed Cited "see" Lewis v. City of Kinston
N.C. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ector v. City of Torrance, 514 P.2d 433 (Cal. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 , 39 L.Ed.2d 493 (1974) (used the rational basis test to uphold the validity of a charter city provision requiring city employees to be city residents); Hattiesburg Firefighters Local 184 v. City of Hattiesburg, 263 So.2d 767 (Miss. 1972) (held that city ordinance requiring civil service employees to reside within corporate limits of city and to move within city within 60 days was not unconstitutional as violating equal protection, due process, or prohibitions against ex post facto laws and laws impairing the o…
discussed Cited "see" Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service Commission (2×)
D.C. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Democratic Central Committee v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, 158 U.S.App.D.C. 7, 26-32 , 485 F.2d 786, 805-11 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 , 94 S.Ct. 1451 , 39 L.Ed.2d 493 (1974).
cited Cited "see" Heinrich v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.
D. Maryland · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 485 F.2d 78, 85-86 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 , 94 S.Ct. 1450 , 39 L.Ed.2d 493 (1974).
cited Cited "see" Doe v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adams v. State, 260 Ind. 663 , 299 N.E.2d 834 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 , 94 S.Ct. 1452 , 39 L.Ed.2d 494 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Gerald P. Carmen, Administrator, General Services Administration
D.C. Cir. · 1981 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Democratic Central Comm. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Comm’n, 485 F.2d 786, 825 (D.C.Cir.1973), cer t. denied, 415 U.S. 935 , 94 S.Ct. 1451 , 39 L.Ed.2d 493 (1974); Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Comm’n, 415 F.2d 922, 944 (D.C.Cir.1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1081 , 89 S.Ct. 860 , 21 L.Ed.2d 773 (1969); Restatement of Restitution § 74 & comment c (1937).
cited Cited "see" Edwards, Inc. v. Arlen Realty & Development Corp.
D.S.C. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 485 F.2d 78 (4th Cir. 1973) cert. den. 415 U.S. 935 , 94 S.Ct. 1450 , 39 L.Ed.2d 493 .
cited Cited "see" Casco Bay Lines v. Public Utilities Commission
Me. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Democratic Central Committee of District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, 158 U.S.App.D.C. 7 , 485 F.2d 786 (1973), cert. denied 415 U.S. 935 , 94 .
cited Cited "see" Hill v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
E.D. Va. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 485 F.2d 78, 85-86 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 , 94 S.Ct. 1450 , 39 L.Ed.2d 493 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Kint v. Terrain King Corp.
M.D. Penn. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 485 F.2d 78 , 82 n. 3 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 , 94 S.Ct. 1450 , 39 L.Ed.2d 493 (1974); Pace v. General Electric Co., 55 F.R.D. 215, 219 (W.D.Pa.1972).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Five Borough Bicycle Club v. City of New York
S.D.N.Y. · 2007 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Wardwell v. Bd. of Educ., 529 F.2d 625, 627 (6th Cir.1976) ("We find no support for plaintiff's theory that the right to intrastate travel has been afforded federal constitutional protection”), Wright v. City of Jackson, 506 F.2d 900, 901-02 (5th Cir.1975) (Supreme Court precedent did not support "the proposition that there is a fundamental constitutional ‘right to commute’ which would cause the compelling governmental purpose test ... to apply”) (citing Ector v. City of Torrance, 10 Cal.3d 129 , 109 Cal.Rptr. 849 , 514 P.2d 433 , (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 , 94 S.Ct. 1…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sani-Dairy v. Yeutter
W.D. Pa. · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Democratic Central Comm. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Comm’n, 485 F.2d 786, 825 (D.C.Cir.1973) (“Restitution is essentially an equitable remedy.”), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 , 94 S.Ct. 1451 , 39 L.Ed.2d 493 (1974); Blair v. Freeman, 370 F.2d 229, 239-40 (D.C.Cir.1966) (plaintiffs’ eight year delay in filing action objecting to milk marketing regulation “is not laches barring all relief, but it certainly affects the relief that may be claimed”; although regulation declared invalid and injunction entered against future enforcement, plaintiffs not entitled to re…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Patricia M. Krueger, and American States Insurance Company, Intervening v. James S. Cartwright
7th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Virginia Electric and Power Company v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, 485 F.2d 78, 84 (4th Cir.1973) (“Where there is partial subrogation, there are two real parties in interest under Rule 17.”), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 , 94 S.Ct. 1450 , 39 L.Ed.2d 493 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ago
Fla. Att'y Gen. · 1976 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Eaton v. City of Torrance, 514 P.2d 433 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 (librarian) (in which Justice Mosk noted at 437, "The question is not whether a man is free to live where he will.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." J. D. Wright v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi
5th Cir. · 1975 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ector v. City of Torrance, 10 Cal.3d 129 , 109 Cal.Rptr. 849 , 514 P.2d 433 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 935 , 94 S.Ct. 1451 , 39 L.Ed.2d 493 (1974) (librarian); Hattiesburg Firefighters Local 184 v. City of Hattiesburg, 263 So.2d 767 (Miss.1972); Abrahams v. Civil Service Commission, 65 N.J. 61 , 319 A.2d 483 (1974) (secretary); Salt Lake City Firefighters Local 1645 v. Salt Lake City, 22 Utah 2d 115 , 449 P.2d 239 , cert. denied, 395 U.S. 906 , 89 S.Ct. 1748 , 23 L.Ed.2d 220 (1969).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stone & Webster Engineering Corp.
v.
Virginia Electric & Power Co., for the use and benefit of Insurance Company of North America and Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Virginia Electric & Power Co., for the use and benefit of Insurance Company of North America
No. 73-1013; No. 73-1014.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1974.
415 U.S. 935
Consideration, Petitions, Took.
Published
4 passages pin-cited by 5 cases
Pinpoint authority: #29,934 of 633,719
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (4) · District of Columbia Court of … (4)

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.

Reported below: 485 E. 2d 78.