green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
James H. McLellan v. Mississippi Power & Light Company, International Brotherhood of Electricalworkers, Local 605 Electrical Workers
But see Cohen v. Illinois Institute of Technology, 524 F.2d 818 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 943 , 96 S.Ct. 1683 , 48 L.Ed.2d 187 (1976) (per Stevens, J.) (no source of constitutional power for section 1985(3) to redress sex discrimination) 40 Jacobson v. Industrial Foundation of the Permian Basin, 456 F.2d 258 (5th Cir. 1972) 41 Bricker v. Crane, 468 F.2d 1228 (1st Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 930 , 93 S.Ct. 1368 , 35 L.Ed.2d 592 (1973) 42 Furumoto v. Lyman, 362 F.Supp. 1267, 1286 (N.D.Cal.1973) 43 Id 44 Smith v. Armstrong, 396 F.Supp. 753 (N.D.Tex.), aff'd without opinion, 524 F.…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Patel v. Holley House Motels
plaintiffs' counsel acknowledged, that cases have shown that 1981 and 1982 are limited to instances of racial discrimination.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Savage
See United States v. Rawlinson, 487 F.2d 5, 7, n. 2 (9th Cir.1973) (court “believe[d] that in most situations an in camera hearing provides a salutary means by which to satisfy the balancing of interests required by Roviaro” and recognized that in camera procedure *453 was approved in a number of other circuits, including the Eighth, Sixth, and Third Circuits), ce rt. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1579 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974); Lloyd, 400 F.2d at 415 (court suggested the use of an in camera hearing to determine if identity of informant’s testimony had to be disclosed).
cited
Cited "see"
Hauptmann v. Wilentz
See Arnold v. Tiffany, 359 F.Supp. 1034, 1036 (C.D.Cal.), aff’d, 487 F.2d 216 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
People v. McLean
See United States v. Rawlinson, 487 F.2d 5 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1579 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974); People v. Stander, 73 Mich.App. 617 , 251 N.W.2d 258 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Boddorff v. Publicker Industries, Inc.
See, for example, DeGraffenreid v. General Motors Assembly Division, 558 F.2d 480 (8th Cir. 1977), Patterson v. American Tobacco Co., 535 F.2d 257 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 920 , 97 S.Ct. 314 , 50 L.Ed.2d 286 (1976), Jenkins v. Blue Cross Mutual Hospital Insurance, Inc., 522 F.2d 1235 (7th Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 986 , 97 S.Ct. 506 , 50 L.Ed.2d 598 (1976), Long v. Ford Motor Co., 496 F.2d 500 (6th Cir. 1974), Arnold v. Tiffany, 487 F.2d 216 (9th Cir. 1973), cert, denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Janusaitis v. Middlebury Volunteer Fire Department
See Arnold v. Tiffany, 487 F.2d 216, 219 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Cogdill v. Commonwealth
See United States v. Pui Kan Lam, 483 F.2d 1202, 1206 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Lee Blevins v. John Ford, III and John Mitchell, Robert Lee Blevins v. John Ford, III and United States of America, Phillip Johnson
See Arnold v. Tiffany, 9 Cir., 1973, 487 F.2d 216, 218 , cert. denied, 1974, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 .
cited
Cited "see"
Regan v. Sullivan
See Arnold v. Tiffany, 487 F.2d 216 (9 Cir. 1973) cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Jackson v. Associated Hosp. Serv. of Philadelphia
(Emphasis added); accord Arnold v. Tiffany, 487 F.2d 216 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Butcher v. State
See also United States v. Rawlinson, 487 F.2d 5 , 7 & n. 2 (9th Cir.1973) (court "believe[d] that in most situations an in camera hearing provides a salutary means by which to satisfy the balancing of interests required by Roviaro ” and recognized that in camera procedure was approved in a number of other circuits, including the Third, Sixth and Eighth Circuits), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1579 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974). 28 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Farrior v. H.J. Russell & Co.
Mayer Co., supra; See also Arnold v. Tiffany, 359 F.Supp. 1034 (C.D.Cal.), aff'd 487 F.2d 216 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ovidio Camejo, Luis Rivera-Torres, Livingston K. Smith, Luis F. Setien, Raul Anchia
See, e.g., United States v. Pareja, 876 F.2d 1567, 1570 (11th Cir.1989); see also United States v. Pui Kan Lam, 483 F.2d 1202, 1208 (2nd Cir.1973), ce rt. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1577 , 1578, 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974) (acting as a lookout).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carlos Manuel Perez
See, e.g., Pareja, 876 F.2d at 1569-70 (defendant’s activity as street lookout during drug deal sufficient to sustain her conviction as an aider and abettor); see also United States v. Pui Kan Lam, 483 F.2d 1202, 1208 (2d Cir.1973) (evidence sufficient where jury could find that defendant “acted as a lookout ... and could thus interpret appellant’s conduct as indicating concern about possible police surveillance.... ”), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Warren Tyler
We agree with the government that “ ‘[o]nce a defendant offers evidence after the denial of a motion for acquittal at the close of the Government’s case ... [he] waives any claim as to the sufficiency of the Government’s case considered alone.’ ” United States v. Maniego, 710 F.2d 24, 28 (2d Cir.1983) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Keuylian, 602 F.2d 1033, 1040-41 (2d Cir.1979)); see also United States v. Pui Kan Lam, 483 F.2d 1202 , 1208 n. 7 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols Chagra
See, e.g., United States v. Pui Kan Lam, 483 F.2d 1202, 1206 (2d Cir.1973), ce rt. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974) (citing with approval People v. Santos, 26 Cal.App.3d 397 , 102 Cal.Rptr. 678 (Ct.App. 2d Dist. 1972), in which the court held that interception of a conversation between husband and wife over a jail intercom telephone was not the interception of an “oral communication” within the wiretap statute, in part because an expectation of privacy would not have been reasonable under the circumstances); see also United States v. Lilly, 576 F.2d 1240, 1244 (…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Martinez v. Winner
See e.g., Arnold v. Tiffany, 487 F.2d 216 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974); Egan v. City of Aurora, 291 F.2d 706, 707 (7th Cir. 1961). 85 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paul Lawrence v. Vernon D. Acree
See, e.g., Arnold v. Tiffany, 487 F.2d 216 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974); Denman v. Leedy, 479 F.2d 1097 (6th Cir. 1973); Hughes v. Ranger Fuel Corp., 467 F.2d 6 (4th Cir. 1972). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Reyes Vargas
Compare United States v. Pui Kan Lam, 483 F.2d 1202, 1208 (2d Cir. 1973), certiorari denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1577 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Howard Brown, United States of America v. Frances Nickel, United States of America v. Robert \Larry\" Mayes
See also United States v. Rawlinson, 487 F.2d 5, 7 (9 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1579 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Brown
See also United States v. Rawlinson, 487 F.2d 5, 7 (9 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1579 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
De Malherbe v. International Union of Elevator Constructors
See, e. g., Arnold v. Tiffany, 359 F.Supp. 1034, 1035 (C.D.Cal.), aff’d on other grounds, 487 F.2d 216 (9 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974) (discrimination against independent newsdealers).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Raymond Johnson
Compare United States v. Pui Kan Lam, 483 F.2d 1202 (2 Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 984 , 94 S.Ct. 1578 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pennsylvania
v.
Felton
v.
Felton
No. 73-810.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1974.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. Alabama (1)
Super. Ct. Pa. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.