green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Glassel, 488 F.2d 143, 145 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 941 , 94 S.Ct. 1945 , 40 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974): "[A]n officer may legitimately obtain an invitation into a house by misrepresenting his identity ...
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Paul Udofot
See United States v. Williams, 485 F.2d 1383, 1385 (4th Cir.1973), cert, denied, 416 U.S. 941 , 94 S.Ct. 1947 , 40 L.Ed.2d 293 (1974); H.R.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick G. Henry
See United States v. Williams, 485 F.2d 1383 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 941 , 94 S.Ct. 1947 , 40 L.Ed.2d 293 (1974) and United States v. Burton, 351 F.Supp. 1372 (W.D.Mo.1972), aff’d, 475 F.2d 469 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 835 , 94 S.Ct. 178 , 38 L.Ed.2d 70 (1973), both so holding.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clifford Bailey, United States of America v. Ronald Clifton Cooley, United States of America v. Ralph Walker
See United States v. Glassel, 488 F.2d 143 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 941 , 94 S.Ct. 1945 , 40 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974); United States v. Teeslink, 421 F.2d 768 (9th Cir. 1970). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frank Quiroz Carrasco, United States of America v. Lucindo Ruiz-Ontiveros
See United States v. Glassel, 9 Cir., 1973, 488 F.2d 143, 146 , cert. denied, 1974, 416 U.S. 941 , 94 S.Ct. 1945 , 40 L.Ed.2d 292 ; United States v. Christopher, supra. We conclude that we must reverse both convictions.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Krug
Courts have held that the “purpose is to effect delivery of the firearm in a manner that makes the carrier aware that a firearm is being transported,” United States v. Dunn, 813 F.2d 1124, 1125 (11th Cir.1987), and that to satisfy this exception “a passenger must give the carrier at least actual notice that the item to be transported is a firearm or ammunition,” United States v. Udofot, 711 F.2d 831, 838 (8th Cir.1983); see also United States v. Williams, 485 F.2d 1383,1385 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, 416 U.S. 941 , 94 S.Ct. 1947 , 40 L.Ed.2d 293 (1974) (holding that to satisfy the passe…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kenneth P. Couch
"An officer may, consistent with the fourth amendment, conceal his or her identity to obtain an invitation to enter a suspect's home." United States v. Bosse, 898 F.2d 113, 115 (9th Cir.1990) (per curiam); see also United States v. Glassel, 488 F.2d 143 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 941 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Hartzog
See, e.g., United States v. Williams, 485 F.2d 1383, 1385 (4th Cir.1973) (“[T]he entire statutory scheme is aimed at restricting the unchecked movement of firearms and ammunition which undermines legitimate efforts to impose reasonable restrictions upon their possession and use.”), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 941 , 94 S.Ct. 1947 , 40 L.Ed.2d 293 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. M.K. Fadel
See, e.g., United States v. Glassel, 488 F.2d 143, 146 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 941 , 94 S.Ct. 1945 , 40 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974) (where the court noted that the defendant’s caution in dealing with two government agents regarding the charged drug sales “would be natural in even the most hardened of criminals”); see also United States v. Glaeser, 550 F.2d 483, 487 (9th Cir.1977) (affirming refusal of entrapment instruction on grounds that recorded conversation clearly showed that defendant was predisposed albeit cautious).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
The United States of America v. Grace Marie Boley
See also, United States v. Gant, 487 F.2d 30 (10 Cir.1973) cert. denied, 416 U.S. 941 , 94 S.Ct. 1946 , 40 L.Ed.2d 293 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Weimer
(2×)
See, e. g, United States v. Glassel, 488 F.2d 143 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 941 , 94 S.Ct. 1945 , 40 L.Ed.2d 292 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert J. Scios A/K/A Robert Schwartz
Compare, Parker v. Estelle, 498 F.2d 625, 630 (5th Cir. 1974), Cert. denied, 421 U.S. 963 , 95 S.Ct. 1951 , 44 L.Ed.2d 450 (1975) (live-witness testimony admissible unless tied "clearly and directly" to illegal search) With Williams v. United States, 382 F.2d 48, 51 (5th Cir. 1967) (live-witness testimony inadmissible if "indirect product" of illegal search) And United States v. Tane, 329 F.2d 848, 853 (2d Cir. 1964) (live-witness testimony inadmissible if illegal information led "directly or indirectly" to discovery of witness) 21 E. g., United States v. Beasley, 485 F.2d 60, 64 (10th Cir. 19…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 73-5865.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 15, 1974.
Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.