green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Noatex Corp. v. King Construction of Houston, LLC
See Spielman-Fond, Inc. v. Hanson’s, Inc., 379 F.Supp. 997 (D.Ariz.1973), affd mem., 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2596 , 41 L.Ed.2d 208 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Diaz v. Paterson
See Doehr, 501 U.S. at 27-29 , 111 S.Ct. 2105 (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring) (citing Spielman-Fond, Inc. v. Hanson’s, Inc., 379 F.Supp. 997, 999 (D.Ariz.1973), aff'd by 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2596, 41 L.Ed.2d 208 (1974), and Bartlett v. Williams, 464 U.S. 801 , 104 S.Ct. 46 , 78 L.Ed.2d 67 (1983) (dismissing Williams v. Bartlett, 189 Conn. 471 , 457 A.2d 290 (1983), “for want of a substantial federal question”)).
cited
Cited "see"
Crown Builders, Inc. v. STOWE ENGINEERING CORP.
See id. at 12 n.4. (citing the Court's summary affirmance in Spielman-Fond, Inc. v. Hanson's, Inc., 417 U.S. 901 , 41 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Haimbaugh Landscaping, Inc. v. Jegen
See Spielman-Fond, Inc. v. Hanson’s, Inc. (1973) D.Ariz., 379 F.Supp 997, summarily aff'd, 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2596 , 41 L.Ed.2d 208 .
cited
Cited "see"
P. & B. Marina, L. P. v. Logrande
See United States v. Otter Tail Power Co., 360 F.Supp. 451, 451-52 (D.Minn.1973), aff'd mem., 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2594 , 41 L.Ed.2d 207 (1974). .
cited
Cited "see"
Dixie Federal Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. Pitre
See Buckner v. Carmack, 272 So.2d 326 (La.1973) appeal dismissed, 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2594 , 41 L.Ed.2d 207 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Attorney General of New York v. Soto-Lopez
(2×)
See August v. Bronstein, 369 F. Supp. 190 (SDNY), summarily aff'd, 417 U. S. 901 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Q-Co Industries, Inc. v. Hoffman
See United States v. Otter Tail Power, 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2549 , 41 L.Ed.2d 207 (1974); California Motor Transport co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508 , 92 S.Ct. 609 , 30 L.Ed.2d 642 (1972).
cited
Cited "see"
Carole K. Evers, an Individual, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. The County of Custer Clyde Rigby, Custer County Commissioner, Defendants-Appellees-Cross Thurlo H. French and Dorothy French, Counterclaimants-Appellees v. Carole K. Evers, an Individual, Counterdefendant-Appellant
Accord Speilman-Fond, Inc. v. Hanson's, Inc., 379 F.Supp. 997 (D.Ariz.1973) (three judge court) appeal dismissed 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2596 , 41 L.Ed.2d 208 (1974). 21 3.
cited
Cited "see"
Evers v. County of Custer
Accord Speilman-Fond, Inc. v. Hanson’s, Inc., 379 F.Supp. 997 (D.Ariz. 1973) (three judge court) appeal dismissed 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2596 , 41 L.Ed.2d 208 (1974). 3.
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Gainesville v. Florida Power & Light Co.
See United States v. Otter Tail Power Co., 331 F.Supp. 54 (D.Minn.1971) aff’d in part, remanded in part, 410 U.S. 366 , 93 S.Ct. 1022 , 35 L.Ed.2d 359 (1973), on remand, D.C., 360 F.Supp. 451 (1973) aff’d without opinion 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2594 , 41 L.Ed.2d 207 (1974). 5 FPL argued in its memorandum and at oral argument that the Cities’ motive is the key factor in determining whether that part of its counterclaim which rests on “improper” judicial and administrative proceedings comes within the sham exception to Noerr-Pennington.
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Swing
Accord, Haines v. Askew, 368 F.Supp. 369 (M.D.Fla.1973), aff’d without opinion, 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2596 , 41 L.Ed.2d 208 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams & Works, Inc. v. Springfield Corp.
See Cook, supra, Ruocco v Brinker, 380 F Supp 432 (SD Fla, 1974), Spielman-Fond, Inc v Hanson’s, Inc, 379 F Supp 997 (D Ariz, 1973), aff'd 417 US 901 ; 94 S Ct 2596 ; 41 L Ed 2d 208 (1974). 5 Prior to August 4, 1972, the record owner of the subject property was Sarah A. Nelson.
cited
Cited "see"
Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Albright
Accord August v. Bronstein, 369 F.Supp. 190, 194 (S.D.N.Y.) (three judge court), aff'd, 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2596 , 41 L.Ed.2d 208 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fraternal Order of Police, DC v. Rubin
Due process is satisfied “if there is an opportunity to be heard before any final order of the agency becomes effective.” Id. at 769 (citing Ewing v. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc., 339 U.S. 594, 598 , 70 S.Ct. 870 , 94 L.Ed. 1088 (1950)); see also Haines v. Askew, 368 F.Supp. 369 (M.D.Fla.1973), aff'd mem., 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2596 , 41 L.Ed.2d 208 (1974) (upholding a hearing procedure that denied a teacher active counsel where findings could not, without a separate hearing, result in punitive action).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. City of Indianapolis Department of Public Works
See also Spielman-Fond, Inc. v. Hanson's Inc. (D.Ariz.1973), 379 F.Supp. 997 , aff'd. (1974), 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2596 , 41 L.Ed.2d 208 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. National Electrical Contractors Association, Inc.
See also United States v. Otter Tail Power Co., 360 F.Supp. 451 (D.Minn.1973) (imposing liability on remand), aff'd mem., 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2594 , 41 L.Ed.2d 207 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Premier Electrical Construction Co. v. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n
See also United States v. Otter Tail Power Co., 360 F.Supp. 451 (D.Minn.1973) (imposing liability on remand), aff 'd mem., 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2594 , 41 L.Ed.2d 207 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Joseph's Hospital, Inc. v. Hospital Authority of America
See, e.g., Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States, 410 U.S. 366, 379-80 , 93 S.Ct. 1022, 1030-31 , 35 L.Ed.2d 359 (1972), on remand, United States v. Otter Tail Power Company, 360 F.Supp. 451 (D.Minn.1973), aff 'd, Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States, 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2594 , 41 L.Ed.2d 207 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a Corporation
(2×)
See, e. g., Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States, 410 U.S. 366 , 93 S.Ct. 1022 , 35 L.Ed.2d 359 , On remand, 360 F.Supp. 451 (D.Minn.1973), aff'd mem., 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2594 , 41 L.Ed.2d 207 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
CDR Enterprises, Ltd. v. BD. OF ED. OF CITY OF NY
See also August v. Bronstein, 369 F.Supp. 190 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2596 , 41 L.Ed.2d 208 (1974) and Russell v. Hodges, 470 F.2d 212 (2d Cir. 1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
C.D.R. Enterprises, Ltd. v. Board of Education
See also August v. Bronstein, 369 F.Supp. 190 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d 417 U.S. 901 , 94 S.Ct. 2596 , 41 L.Ed.2d 208 (1974) and Russell v. Hodges, 470 F.2d 212 (2d Cir. 1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carmack
v.
Buckner
v.
Buckner
No. 72-1369.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 1974.
417 U.S. 901
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. La. Motion of Federal National Mortgage[*902] Assn, for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question.