green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.1 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
David Wayne Sconce v. Gil Garcetti, District Attorney Harvey Giss, District Attorney, David Wayne Sconce v. Sam Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections Attorney General of the State of California
at stake is the honor of the government public confidence in the fair administration of justice, and the efficient administration of justice in the federal scheme of government.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ab Iro v. Otex, Inc.
having described his invention and shown its principle, a patentee is deemed to claim every form in which his invention may be copied
cited
Cited "see"
Barbato v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
See Torske v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 59, 60 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 2646 , 41 L.Ed.2d 237 (1974); Harvey v. Richardson, 451 F.2d 589, 590 (9th Cir.1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Cansio v. Shalala
See Torske v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 59, 60 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 2646 , 41 L.Ed.2d 237 (1974); Harvey v. Richardson, 451 F.2d 589, 590 (9th Cir.1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Robison
See United States v. Carter, 454 F.2d 426 (4th Cir.1972) (en banc), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 2646 , 41 L.Ed.2d 237 (1974) (United States Attorneys in different districts are bound by one another’s plea agreements unless the agreement expressly provides otherwise).
discussed
Cited "see"
Slimfold Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Kinkead Industries, Inc. And United States Gypsum Company, Defendants
Accord Dart Indus., Inc. v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 348 F.Supp. 1338,1343 , 175 USPQ 540, 544 (N.D.Ill.1972), rev’d on other grounds, 489 F.2d 1359 , 179 USPQ 392 (7th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 2645 , 41 L.Ed.2d 236 (1974) (an amendment to provide an antecedent held to correct a formal defect without a change in scope).
cited
Cited "see"
Warner v. Schweiker
See Torske v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 59, 60 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 2646 , 41 L.Ed.2d 237 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Minor v. Harris
See Davis v. Craven, 485 F.2d 1138, 1140 (9th Cir.1973) (en banc), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 2645 , 41 L.Ed.2d 236 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven W. Arnett
See United States v. Carter, 454 F.2d 426 (4th Cir. 1972) (en banc), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 2646 , 41 L.Ed.2d 237 (1974) (where defendant and government disputed whether government had promised not to prosecute defendant in exchange for his cooperation in apprehending other defendants, case remanded for evidentiary hearing on existence and terms of alleged bargain). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Nally
See People v. Manzella (1973), 56 Ill. 2d 187 , 306 N.E.2d 16 , cert, denied (1974), 417 U.S. 933 , 41 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Poore v. Mathews
See Timmerman v. Weinberger, 510 F.2d 439, 442 (8th Cir. 1975), citing Torske v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 59, 60 (9th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 2646 , 41 L.Ed.2d 237 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. D.K.G. Appaloosas, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Carter, 454 F.2d 426, 428 (4th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 2646 , 41 L.Ed.2d 237 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brooks v. Narick
(2×)
See also, United States v. Carter, 454 F.2d 426 cert. denied 417 U. S. 933 (1972); and U. S. v. Paiva, 294 F.Supp. 742 (D.D.C. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.
See also Trico Products Corp. v. Roberk Co., 369 F.Supp. 1146, 1155-56 (D.Conn.), aff’d, 490 F.2d 1280 (2d Cir. 1973) (without considering this ground), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 2645 , 41 L.Ed.2d 236 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brockman
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Carter, 454 F.2d 426 (4th Cir.1972) (en banc), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 933 (1974) (government promise of no future prosecutions arising out of certain transactions); State v. Thomas, 61 N.J. 314 , 294 A.2d 57 (1972) (guilty plea to assault pursuant to agreement held to bar subsequent murder charges). [3] However, Santobello, Miller, and almost all of the other reported cases dealing with the question have arisen in situations where the prosecutor, after the entry of a guilty plea by the defendant, took some course of action inconsistent with what the accused claimed …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Vincent Papa
Compare United States v. Carter, 454 F.2d 426 (4th Cir. 1972) (en banc), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 933 , 94 S.Ct. 2646 , 41 L.Ed.2d 237 (1974), with United States v. Boulier, 359 F.Supp. 165 (E.D.N.Y.1972), aff’d sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carter
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 73-6315.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 3, 1974.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1) · D. South Carolina (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.