green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.1 score
“consignment debt" represents a "substantial anticipated profit" rather than an "operational deficit”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Al Taylor
But see, e. g., United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1330 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975). 3 Turner does not make the argument that acquittal on the substantive count makes this evidence inadmissible in connection with the conspiracy count, nor could he in the light of United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337 , 1344 n.9 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Jamiel Alexander Chagra
consignment debt" represents a "substantial anticipated profit" rather than an "operational deficit
discussed
Cited "see"
National Audubon Society v. Davis
However, “a general threat of prosecution is not enough to confer standing.” San Diego, 98 F.3d at 1127 (9th Cir.1996); see Rincon Band of Mission Indians v. County of San Diego, 495 F.2d 1, 5 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974) (holding that sheriffs statement to tribal members that county ordinance prohibiting gambling would be enforced within his jurisdiction was insufficient).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rudy G. Stanko v. United States
See Rincon Band of Mission Indians v. County of San Diego, 495 F.2d 1, 4 (9th Cir.) (declaratory relief not warranted when Indians alleged a general threat by Sheriff to enforce gambling law within his jurisdiction), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 1022 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Ulloa and Adolpho Transito
See United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1349 (2d Cir.) (citing cases), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Tarantino
See United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1345 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974) (cited in Brief for Bell at 35), and supra at 1392-93.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John C. Tarantino, United States of America v. Robert H. Burns, United States of America v. Fred B. Black, Jr., United States of America v. Wilfred Samuel Bell, A/K/A Sam Bell
See United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1345 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974) (cited in Brief for Bell at 35), and supra at 1392-93. 46 Bell had extensive dealings not only with Strickland, but also with other players in the conspiracy's distribution chain.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Monsrud
(2×)
See, United States v. Sisca, 361 F.Supp. 735, 746-47 (S.D.N.Y.1973), aff’d, 503 F.2d 1337 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974), and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shakur
See U.S. v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1343 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez-Torres
See United States v. Sisea, 503 F.2d 1337, 1345-46 (2d Cir.) (affirming a § 848 conviction although there were no indictments for substantive offenses), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Herbert Sperling v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1345-46 (2 Cir.) (affirming a § 848 conviction although there were no indictments for substantive offenses), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Cicale, Frank Desimone, Paul Spector
(2×)
See United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1343 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Suquet
A few courts have indicated that “Congress did not intend that evidence directly within the ambit of a lawful order should be suppressed because the officers, while awaiting the incriminating evidence, also gathered extraneous conversations.” United States v. Cox, 462 F.2d 1293, 1301 (8th Cir. 1972), cert, denied, 417 U.S. 918 , 94 S.Ct. 2623 , 41 L.Ed.2d 223 (1974); accord, United States v. Sisca, 361 F.Supp. 735, 740-48 (S.D.N.Y.1973), affd on other grounds, 503 F.2d 1337 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Civella
See United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1346-47 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nancy Baker and William James Reeder
See United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1349 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974) 6 Appellants have not suggested that applicable state law places more restrictive constraints on officers executing a search warrant than does the Fourth Amendment.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Orlando Vasquez, Carlos Sanchez, Fernando Eugenio Medina, Amparo Valencia Medina, Clara Inez Mesa and Hernando Mesa
See United States v. Sisea, 503 F.2d 1337, 1343 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974) (evidence sufficient to permit inference of active participation in narcotics conspiracy where defendant’s entire house was a “stash” for large amounts of cash, narcotics and related paraphernalia, and defendant was present while others entered and left carrying containers of heroin).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Baker
See United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1349 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974). .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Barrise
See United States v. Sisca, 361 F.Supp. 735, 738-741 (S.D.N.Y.1973) aff’d 503 F.2d 1337, 1346-1349 (2 Cir. 1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Humboldt Fir, Inc.
See Rincon Band of Mission Indians v. County of San Diego, 324 F.Supp. 371, 374-375 (S.D.Cal. 1971), rev’d on other grounds, 495 F.2d 1 (9 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974). 2 However, by enacting § 1360, Congress did not intend an immediate termination of the relationship between the Indian *296 tribes and the BIA or intend to abolish Indian immunity from state jurisdiction in certain significant areas including tribal self-government on reservation trust lands and economic development of reservation resources.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nation v. Tanner
Mar. 31, 2015) (comparing cases); see also Rincon Band of Mission Indians v. San Diego Cnty., 495 F.2d 1 , 4 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974) (holding that government officials’ statements to plaintiffs that gambling was impermissible on tribal land “under [a] county ordinance,” and that “all the laws of the county would be enforce,” failed to establish a sufficient “threat of prosecution” for standing purposes).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abelis
See United States v. Pitre, 960 F.2d 1112, 1122 (2d Cir.1992) (where the evidence showed, in part, that the defendant was arrested with $292,920, the jury could infer that the defendant was aware of his role in a narcotics conspiracy); Scarpa, 913 F.2d at 1006 (jury could view acceptance of $6,000 as evidence of participation in a conspiracy and could reject the defendant’s contention that he accepted the money as a favor to his brother); see also United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1343 (2d Cir.) (“the suggestion that members of a conspiracy would entrust $60,000 in cash and a large qu…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Abelis
See United States v. Pitre, 960 F.2d 1112, 1122 (2d Cir.1992) (where the evidence showed, in part, that the defendant was arrested with $292,920, the jury could infer that the defendant was aware of his role in a narcotics conspiracy); Scarpa, 913 F.2d at 1006 (jury could view acceptance of $6,000 as evidence of participation in a conspiracy and could reject the defendant's contention that he accepted the money as a favor to his brother); see also United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1343 (2d Cir.) ("the suggestion that members of a conspiracy would entrust $60,000 in cash and a large quanti…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Martin Roman
In determining whether the defendant’s income has been substantial, the jury is entitled to consider both direct evidence of a defendant’s wealth, see id., and circumstantial evidence, such as a defendant’s position as the head of a large hierarchical drug operation, see United States v. Ayala, 769 F.2d at 102-03; see also United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337, 1346 (2d Cir.) (substantiality shown by “enormous quantity of narcotics involved” and “substantial sums of money changing hands”), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
International Society for Krishna Consciousness v. Eaves
See, e.g., Rincon Band of Mission Indians v. County of San Diego, 495 F.2d 1, 4-6 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
International Society For Krishna Consciousness Of Atlanta v. Eaves
See, e. g., Rincon Band of Mission Indians v. County of San Diego, 495 F.2d 1, 4-6 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James M. McCoy
See also 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (10)(a), which provides that a motion to suppress unlawfully intercepted communications should be made before trial “unless there was no opportunity to make such motion or the person [seeking to suppress] was not aware of the grounds of the motion”, and United States v. Sisca, S.D.N.Y. 1973, 361 F.Supp. 735, 738-41 , aff’d, 2 Cir. 1974, 503 F.2d 1337, 1346-49 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 . 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sperling
See, e. g., United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974); United States v. Manfredi, 488 F.2d 588 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 2651 , 41 L.Ed.2d 240 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sisca
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 73-1855.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 11, 1974.
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.