green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
12.2 score
“the conduct of a fair trial is a matter within the trial judge's discretion.”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Mark Richard Powers
(2×)
But cf. United States v. Schiavo, 504 F.2d 1, 4-5 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, Ditter v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 690 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974) (order enjoining news media, a non-party, from publishing information during trial appealable within collateral order doctrine); United States v. Cianfrani, 573 F.2d 835, 845 (3d Cir. 1978) (order closing pretrial hearing appealable by news media, intervenors, within collateral order doctrine).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.
the conduct of a fair trial is a matter within the trial judge's discretion.
discussed
Cited "see"
GXP Capital v. Argonaut Manufacturing Services
See Gannett Co., Inc. v. State, 565 A.2d 895, 900 (Del. 1989) (recognizing collateral review of a final decision “since it determined a [civil] matter independent of the issues to be resolved in the criminal proceeding itself, bound persons who were non-parties in the underlying criminal proceeding and had a substantial, continuing effect on important rights”) (alteration in original) (quoting United States v. Schiavo, 504 F.2d 1, 5 (3d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 (1974)); see also Moses H.
cited
Cited "see"
Centocor, Inc. v. Hamilton
See Reyes v. Wyeth Labs., 498 F.2d 1264 , 1276 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, 399 F.2d 121 , 131 (9th Cir. 1968) (manufacturer of polio vaccil was not protected by the learned intermediary doctrine because the vaccine vf dispensed at a mass immunization clinic, outside the context of the doctor-patio relationship); accord Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1276-77 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S. Ct. 687 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Rezulin Products Liability Litigation
See id. at 691 (quoting Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974)). 19 .
discussed
Cited "see"
House v. Armour of America, Inc.
As a corollary, many jurisdictions have concluded that “because a manufacturer or seller would benefit when a warning was provided, ... ‘a buyer or user should benefit where a warning is not given.’ ” Coffman, 133 N.J. 581 , 628 A.2d at 717 (quoting Coffman v. Keene Corp., 257 N.J.Super. 279 , 608 A.2d 416 (1992)); see Reyes v. Wyeth Lab., 498 F.2d 1264 , 1281 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038, 1057 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984); But…
discussed
Cited "see"
Coffman v. Keene Corp.
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F. 2d 1264 , 1281 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 688 (1974); Nissen Trampoline Co. v. Terre Haute First Nat'l Bank, 332 N.E. 2d at 826 ; Butz v. Werner, 438 N.W. 2d 509, 516 (N.D. 1989); Seley v. G.D.
cited
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,013 Mary Kathryn Thomas v. Hoffman-Laroche, Inc.
See Technical Chemical Co. v. Jacobs, 480 S.W.2d 602, 605 (Tex.1972). 26 . 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974). 27 . 498 F.2d at 1281. 28 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Snawder v. Cohen
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Givens v. Lederle, 556 F.2d 1341 (5th Cir.1977); Johnson, 718 P.2d 1318 ; Dunn, 328 N.W.2d 576 ; Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 399 F.2d 121 (9th Cir.1968); Cunningham v. Charles Pfizer & Co., 532 P.2d 1377 (Okl.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
NIEMIERA BY NIEMIERA v. Schnieder
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); see also Stephens v. G.D.
cited
Cited "see"
prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 11,871 Dean Garrett and Lyone Garrett v. Hamilton Standard Controls, Inc.
See Reyes v. Wyeth Labs, Inc., 498 F.2d 1264 , 1280 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Roger N. Phelps v. Sherwood Medical Industries and Argyle Associates
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.1974), certiorari denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dicie Ellen Hibley Swayze, Legal Guardian and Next Friend of Michael Wayne Swayze v. McNeil Laboratories, Inc.
(2×)
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Givens v. Lederle, 556 F.2d 1341 (5th Cir.1977); Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 399 F.2d 121 (9th Cir.1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walter R. Brooks, Jr. v. Medtronic, Inc., a Corporation, Association of Trial Lawyers of America, Amicus Curiae
(2×)
Accord Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974) (Texas law); Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 399 F.2d 121 (9th Cir.1968) (Montana law); Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Cornish, 370 F.2d 82 (8th Cir.1966) (Missouri law).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert L. Petty v. United States
(2×)
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1294 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); 10 see also id. at 1294 n. 57 (recognizing view that burden should be born by the government because of the societal benefit bestowed by individuals receiving the vaccine).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jefferey Dale Ellis, Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Ann Ellis, Deceased v. International Playtex, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 698 (1974) (CDC studies admitted to show number of reported incidences of polio).
cited
Cited "see"
Fraley v. American Cyanamid Co.
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1279 (5th Cir.1974), ce rt. denied 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1979).
examined
Cited "see"
Dickey-John Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. International Tapetronics Corporation and Field Electronics, Inc., Cross-Appellees
(8×)
See generally, Research Corp. v. Nasco Industries, Inc., 501 F.2d 358, 360 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 689 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
David C. Ellis, Next Friend of Jacob Ray Ellis v. K-Lan Co., Inc.
See generally Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1280-81 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH v. Dart Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See Research Corp. v. NASCO Industries, Inc., 501 F.2d 358 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 689 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Alco Std.
discussed
Cited "see"
Kehm v. Procter & Gamble Co.
Bas-ko v. Sterling Drug, Inc., 416 F.2d 417 (2nd Cir.1969) (manufacturer equally obli *905 gated to warn in cases where drug may affect small number of “idiosyncratic or hypersensitive” users); Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 399 F.2d 121 (9th Cir. 1968) (duty to warn exists even though chance of contracting polio only 1 in 1,000,-000); accord, Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Yarrow, 408 F.2d 978 (8th Cir.1969); Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Cornish, 370 F.2d 82 (8th Cir. 1966). 16…
discussed
Cited "see"
Robinson v. United States
See, Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 399 F.2d 121 (9th Cir. 1968), and Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974), for decisions addressing the problems of securing commercial liability insurance when a vaccine manufacturer is held strictly liable. 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Tabaczynski v. United States
See Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 399 F.2d 121 (9th Cir. 1968), and Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Beatrice G. Stanback v. Parke, Davis and Company
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., 399 F.2d 121 (9th Cir. 1968); Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Cornish, 370 F.2d 82 (8th Cir. 1966). 2 We sit as a Virginia court in this diversity action and therefore look to Virginia substantive law for authority.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shirley R. Corey and Allen G. Corey, Sr., Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Allen G. Corey, Jr. v. Charles W. Jones, III
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 , 1289 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Delancey v. Motichek Towing Service, Inc., 427 F.2d 897 (5th Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burks v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 , 1274 n.17 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Boatland of Houston, Inc. v. Bailey, 609 S.W.2d 743 (Tex.1980); Bell Helicopter Co. v. Bradshaw, 594 S.W.2d 519, 530 (Tex.Civ.App.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burks v. Firestone
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 , 1274 n.17 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Boatland of Houston, Inc. v. Bailey, 609 S.W.2d 743 (Tex.1980); Bell Helicopter Co. v. Bradshaw, 594 S.W.2d 519, 530 (Tex.Civ.App.1979). 14 According to Webster's Third New International Dictionary, "feasible" simply means "capable of being done".
cited
Cited "see"
Nancy C. Lindsay and Bruce H. Lindsay v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 , 1276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Cornish, 370 F.2d 82, 85 (8th Cir. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lindsay v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1281 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 270 Or. 375 , 528 P.2d 522, 538-39 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Adele Halkin
(2×)
See United States v. Schiavo, 504 F.2d 1, 4-5 (3d Cir.) (en banc), Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 690 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974). 61 V. 71 In accordance with our usual practice, we will not issue the writ at this time.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Premises Known as 608 Taylor Ave., Apartment 302, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Appeal of Harold Margolis
(2×)
See United States v. Schiavo, 504 F.2d 1, 7 (3d Cir. 1974) (en banc), Cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 690 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Paradiso v. United States, 482 F.2d 409, 413 (3d Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Curtis Hagans v. Oliver MacHinery Company v. Century MacHinery Company, Texas Employers' Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellee
Welch v. Outboard Marine Corp., 481 F.2d 252, 254 (5th Cir. 1973); see Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1273-74 (5th Cir.) (applying Texas law), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); General Motors Corp. v. Hopkins, 548 S.W.2d 344 , 347 n.1 (Tex.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dalke v. The Upjohn Company
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 , 1276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, 399 F.2d 121 , 130 (9th Cir. 1968); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388, comment (g). 12 Dr. Corlett, the treating physician, did testify that he read the PDR and package inserts as they came out or at least that he was aware of the warnings contained therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dalke v. Upjohn Co.
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 , 1276 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, 399 F.2d 121 , 130 (9th Cir. 1968); Restatement (Second) of Torts § 388, comment (g).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pederson v. STEWART-WARNER CORPORATION
(2×)
Accord, Research Corporation v. Nasco Industries, Inc., 501 F.2d 358 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 689 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Sweetheart Plastics, Inc., 436 F.2d 1180 (7th Cir. 1971), cert. dism’d 403 U.S. 942 , 91 S.Ct. 2270 , 29 L.Ed.2d 722 (1971).
cited
Cited "see"
Doris R. Edwards, Etc., Cross-Appellant v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Cross-Appellees
See Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 5 Cir., 1974, 498 F.2d 1264 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 ; Restatement of Torts Second, Section 402A, Comments j and k. 17 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beale v. Biomet, Inc.
Compare Terhune, (characterizing the philosophy as a well established rule) with Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974) (characterizing the special standard as an exception to the restatement general rule).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Freeman v. United Cities Propane Gas of Georgia, Inc.
See, e.g., Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1276 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jan L. Wilson Emery C. Farris, III and Rebecca Farris, John D. Wilson v. The Upjohn Corporation
See, e.g., Reyes v. Wyeth Lab., 498 F.2d 1264 , 1276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 (1974); Hill v. Squibb & Sons, 181 Mont. 199 , 592 P.2d 1383, 1387-88 (1979). 12 In this case, the plaintiffs have failed to present evidence that the medical profession was not given sufficient warnings about Halcion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Butz v. Werner
(2×)
See, e.g., Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1281 (5th Cir.) (applying Texas law), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Nissen Trampoline Co. v. Terre Haute First National Bank, 332 N.E.2d 820, 826-827 (Ind. Ct.App.1975), rev'd on procedural grounds, 265 Ind. 457 , 358 N.E.2d 974 (1976); Wooderson v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 235 Kan. 387 , 681 P.2d 1038, 1057 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 965 , 105 S.Ct. 365 , 83 L.Ed.2d 301 (1984); Wolfe v. Ford Motor Co., 6 Mass.App.Ct. 346 , 376 N.E.2d 143, 147 (1978); Seley v. G.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clois Osburn and Anita Osburn v. Anchor Laboratories, Inc., Rachelle Laboratories, Inc.
This doctrine, recognized by Texas courts, provides that “when a [prescription] drug manufacturer properly warns a prescribing physician of the dangerous propensities of its product, the manufacturer is excused from warning each patient who receives the drug.” Alm v. Aluminum Co. of America, 717 S.W.2d 588, 591 (Tex.1986); see also Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1275-76 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Gravis v. Parke-Davis & Co., 502 S.W.2d 863, 870 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1973, writ ref’d n.r.e.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joel Levine v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States of America, Real Party in Interest
(2×)
Angel v. Woodahl, 171 Mont. 13 , 555 P.2d 501, 504 (1976); Houston Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Har- dy, 678 S.W.2d 495 (Tex.App.1984), cert. denied, —— U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1754 , 84 L.Ed.2d 817 (1985); see also United States v. Schiavo, 504 F.2d 1, 6 (3d Cir.) (en banc) (dictum in plurality opinion), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 690 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.
See, e.g., Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1274-75 (5th Cir.) (oral polio vaccine unavoidably unsafe under Comment k), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Fellows v. USV Pharmaceutical Corp., 502 F.Supp. 297, 300 (D.Md.1980) (prescription drug constituted unavoidably unsafe product).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
18 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 428, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,840 Sarah Coursen and Katherine Cook v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Terri Johnson, Gayle McCann Laurie Jo Franz, Debbie Rohn, and Pamela Van Duyn v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation
See, e.g., Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264, 1274-75 (5th Cir.) (oral polio vaccine unavoidably unsafe under Comment k), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974); Fellows v. USV Pharmaceutical Corp., 502 F.Supp. 297, 300 (D.Md.1980) (prescription drug constituted unavoidably unsafe product).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cooley v. Carter-Wallace Inc.
Agnes Hosp., 70 AD2d 400 and cases cited therein; see, also, Reyes v Wyeth Labs., 498 F2d 1264, 1275, cert den 419 US 1096; Laturen v Bolten Drug Co., 188 NY 574 ; Donigi v American Cyanamid Co., 57 AD2d 760 , affd 43 NY2d 935 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Buckner v. Allergan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Compare Terhune, (characterizing the philosophy as a well established rule) with Reyes v. Wyeth Laboratories, 498 F.2d 1264 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 687 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974) (characterizing the special standard as an exception to the restatement general rule).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edwards
(2×)
See also United States v. Schiavo, 504 F.2d 1 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 690 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fred Whitaker Company v. E. T. Barwick Industries, Inc.
(2×)
See also, e. g., Research Gorp. v. Nasco Industries, Inc., 501 F.2d 358, 360-61 (CA7), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 689 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974). 34 Simply because Whitaker uses the process to achieve a different result does not answer whether the difference is qualitative enough to be non-obvious.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Walter H. Pederson, Resident of Minnesota v. Stewart-Warner Corporation, a Corporation of the State of Virginia,defendant-Appellee
(2×)
Compare Research Corp. v. Nasco Industries, Inc., 501 F.2d 358, 360 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1096 , 95 S.Ct. 689 , 42 L.Ed.2d 688 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Research Corp.
v.
Nasco Industries, Inc.
v.
Nasco Industries, Inc.
No. 74-498.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 23, 1974.
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.