green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“the filing of a timely refund claim is a jurisdictional requirement, 16 which cannot be waived.”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dacanay v. Government of Guam
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
the filing of a timely refund claim is a jurisdictional requirement, 16 which cannot be waived.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Reserve Life Insurance Company and Midland National Life Insurance Company v. Pitfield MacKay & Company, Intervenors-Appellants v. Provident Life Insurance Company
All petitions were denied. 419 U.S. at 1107, 95 S.Ct. 778 .
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Reserve Life Insurance v. Pitfield Mackay & Co.
All petitions were denied. 419 U.S. at 1107, 95 S.Ct. 778 .
discussed
Cited "see"
ER Holdings, Inc. v. Norton Co.
See Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Provident Life Insurance Co., 499 F.2d 715 (8th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 778 , 42 L.Ed.2d 803 (1975); Danaher Corp. v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co., No. 86 Civ. 3499 & 3638 (PNL), slip op., 1986 WL 7001 (S.D.N.Y.
discussed
Cited "see"
The Association of the Bar of the City of New York v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Political campaigns did not fit within any of the specified purposes listed in the section.” 9 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation § 34.05 (rev. vol. 1983) at 22; see Haswell v. United States, 500 F.2d 1133, 1140 , 205 Ct.Cl. 421 (1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 779 , 42 L.Ed.2d 803 (1975); Herbert E.
cited
Cited "see"
Kadah v. United States
See Essex v. Vinal, 499 F.2d 226 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 779 , 42 L.Ed.2d 803 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Strable
See United States v. Infelice, 506 F.2d 1358, 1363 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 778 , 42 L.Ed.2d 802 (1974) (determination of whether defendant’s right to confrontation violated depends upon whether defendant deprived of right to test truth of direct testimony); United States v. Rogers, 475 F.2d 821, 827 (7th Cir. 1973); United States v. Ragano, 476 F.2d 410, 415 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 427 U.S. 905 , 96 S.Ct. 3192 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1976) (confrontation clause not violated if declarant testifies as witness and subject to full and effective cross-examination…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zemek
See United States v. Lippman, 492 F.2d 314, 317 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 779 , 42 L.Ed.2d 803 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Zemek
See United States v. Lippman, 492 F.2d 314, 317 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 779 , 42 L.Ed.2d 803 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hubbard
See United States v. Lippman, 492 F.2d 314, 317 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 779 , 42 L.Ed.2d 803 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. E. John Wentland
See United States v. Prince, 496 F.2d 1289 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 779 , 42 L.Ed.2d 804 (1975) (conspiracy); United States v. Warner, supra, (conspiracy); Kroll v. United States, 433 F.2d 1282 (5th Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 402 U.S. 944 , 91 S.Ct. 1616 , 29 L.Ed.2d 112 (1971) (mail fraud and conspiracy); Blachly v. United States, 380 F.2d 665 (5th Cir. 1967) (mail fraud).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, International Union of Operating Engineers Appeal of Abraham E. Freedman, Esquire
See In re Williams, 500 F.2d 403, 405 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 778 , 42 L.Ed.2d 803 (1975); United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91, 95 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1003 , 86 S.Ct. 1914 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation
Id. at 52 ; see also United States v. Infelice, 506 F.2d 1358, 1365 (7th Cir.1974) (citing §§ 2511(2)(c) and 2517(3) in support of a holding that tapes made by a government informant were admissible), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 778 , 42 L.Ed.2d 802 (1975); United States v. Upton, 502 F.Supp. 1193, 1199 (D.N.H.1980) (“Read, as they must be, together, 18 U.S.C. § 2511 (2)(c) and § 2517(3) specifically authorize the admission into evidence of recordings of this type.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Amirault
See also United States v. Infelice, 506 F.2d 1358, 1363 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 (1975) (defendant entitled to test the truth of a witness’s testimony on direct examination).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
NUI CORP. v. Kimmelman
Loss, Fundamentals of Securities Regulation, 509, 525 (1983); see also Reserve Life Insurance Co. v. Provident Life Insurance Co., 499 F.2d 715 (8th Cir.1974) (section 14(a), and rules promulgated thereunder, provide that competing interests are furnished equal opportunities to communicate with and influence shareholders), cert. *1470 denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 778 , 42 L.Ed.2d 803 (1975). 12 Having explicated the broad purposes underlying the federal proxy rules, we turn to the specific challenge to the New Jersey statute.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Gerald Carleo
See, e. g., United States v. Lippman, 492 F.2d 314 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 779 , 42 L.Ed.2d 803 (1975) (§ 1510); United States v. Ryan, 455 F.2d 728 (9th Cir. 1972) (§ 1503); see Pettibone v. United States, 148 U.S. 197 , 13 S.Ct. 542 , 37 L.Ed. 419 (1893).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Demetri Thor v. United States
See also United States v. Infelice, 506 F.2d 1358, 1364-65 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1107 , 95 S.Ct. 778 , 42 L.Ed.2d 802 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Casey
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 74-388.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1975.
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.