green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Tariq
(2×)
But cf. Martin-Mendoza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 499 F.2d 918 (9 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 789 , 42 L.Ed.2d 810 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ivan Dejesus Mejia-Uribe
See United States v. Roberts, 503 F.2d 598, 600 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 791 , 42 L.Ed.2d 811 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ivan Mejia-Uribe
See United States v. Roberts, 503 F.2d 598, 600 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Travis Murphy v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Martin-Mendoza v. INS, 499 F.2d 918, 921 (9th Cir.1974) (approving the hearing officer’s determination that the “weight [of a sworn statement] is necessarily impaired by the fact that the affiant could not be presented for cross-examination”), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 789 , 42 L.Ed.2d 810 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Walter Manuel Tapia Reyes v. The United States Attorney General U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Martin-Mendoza v. INS, 499 F.2d 918, 920 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Amrut Narandas Patel v. Michael Landon, Jr., District Director I & Ns
(2×)
See Martin-Mendoza v. I.N.S., 499 F.2d 918, 921-22 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied 419 U.S. 1113, 95 S.Ct. 789 , 42 L.Ed.2d 810 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lanza v. Poretti
(2×)
See United States v. Whitaker, 372 F.Supp. 154, 166 (D.C.M.D.Pa.1974), aff'd, 503 F.2d 1399 (3rd Cir.) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 789 , 42 L.Ed.2d 810 (1975). 16 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alessi
See United States v. Cowles, 503 F.2d 67, 68 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 790 , 42 L.Ed.2d 811 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alessi
See United States v. Cowles, 503 F.2d 67, 68 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 790 , 42 L.Ed.2d 811 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wilkinson
See for e. g., United States v. Roberts, 503 F.2d 598, 600 (9th Cir. 1974), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 791 , 42 L.Ed.2d 811 (1975); United States v. Gomez-Rojas, 507 F.2d 1213, 1220 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 423 U.S. 826 , 96 S.Ct. 41 , 46 L.Ed.2d 42 (1975); Myers v. Frye, 401 F.2d 18, 21 (7th Cir. 1968); United States v. Johnson, 488 F.2d 1206, 1211 (1st Cir. 1973); United States ex reí.
discussed
Cited "see"
Alston v. United States
In re J.W.Y., D.C.App., 363 A.2d 674 , 682-83 (1976); see United States v. Roberts, 503 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 791 , 42 L.Ed.2d 811 (1975); United States v. Johnson, 488 F.2d 1206 (1st Cir. 1973). 4 If, therefore, Burton had a constitutional right to refuse to testify, and if his refusal was not improperly induced by the government or by the court, *311 appellant could not validly complain of an infringement upon his rights.
discussed
Cited "see"
Daniel C. Summers v. United States
(2×)
Lockett v. Henderson, 484 F.2d 62, 64 (5th Cir. 1973); see United States v. Gearin, 496 F.2d 691, 692-93 (5th Cir.1974), ce rt. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 789 , 42 L.Ed.2d 810 (1975); cf. McChesney v. Henderson, 482 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir. 1973). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Noel Quinn, United States of America v. Lee Wilson
(2×)
See United States v. Norton, 504 F.2d 342, 345 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 790 , 42 L.Ed.2d 811 (1975). 4 The requirement of “substantial prejudice” set forth in United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 324 , 92 S.Ct. 455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971) requires more than a mere showing of the unavailability of any witness.
examined
Cited "see"
Joseph Paul v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service
(4×)
We interpret counsel to mean not errorless counsel, and not counsel judged ineffective by hindsight, but counsel reasonably likely to render And rendering reasonably effective assistance. 9 Jolley, supra, 441 F.2d at 1255 ; see Martin-Mendoza v. INS, 9 Cir. 1974, 499 F.2d 918 , cert. denied, 1975, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 789 , 42 L.Ed.2d 810 ; Strantzalis v. INS, 3 Cir. 1972, 465 F.2d 1016 ; Ah Chiu Pang v. INS, 3 Cir. 1966, 368 F.2d 637 , cert. denied, 1967, 386 U.S. 1037 , 87 S.Ct. 1490 , 18 L.Ed.2d 601 10 In any event, the failure to object did not infect the fairness of the proceedings be…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nasir Mahroozadeh v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See also Martin-Mendoza v. INS, 499 F.2d 918, 921 (9th Cir.1974) (noting that an administrative tribunal is not required to follow the Federal Rules of Evidence), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 (1975). 8 Mahroozadeh did not testify in response to the evidence presented by the government.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Juana Suarez-Milian, United States of America v. Ruben Leon Guzman
See also United States v. Cowles, 503 F.2d 67, 68 (2d Cir. 1974) (per curiam) (no abuse of discretion to decline question regarding failure to testify), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ellis v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Roberts, 503 F.2d 598 (9th Cir.1974), cert. den. 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 791 , 42 L.Ed.2d 811 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lopez-Mendoza v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
(2×)
See, e.g., Martin-Mendoza v. INS, 499 F.2d 918, 922 (9th Cir.1974) (the sixth amendment’s guarantee of the right to counsel is not applicable to deportation proceedings), cer t. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 789 , 42 L.Ed.2d 810 (1975); Lavoie v. INS, 418 F.2d 732, 734 (9th Cir.1969) (deportation proceedings are civil in nature, therefore presence of counsel during interrogation and other sixth amendment rights are inapplicable), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 854 , 91 S.Ct. 72 , 27 L.Ed.2d 92 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Elias Montoya-Camacho
(2×)
See also United States v. Gearin, 496 F.2d 691 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 789 , 42 L.Ed.2d 810 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Pardo
See also United States v. Roberts, 503 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1113 , 95 S.Ct. 791 , 42 L.Ed.2d 811 (1975); United States v. Trejo-Zambrano, 582 F.2d 460 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1005 , 99 S.Ct. 618 , 58 L.Ed.2d 682 (1978). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Scott
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 74-5329.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1975.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.