green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.5 score
“(t)here is no single 'reasonable' rate for a commodity. rather, there is a 'zone of reasonableness' within which carriers are free to adjust their rates at will”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
New England Grain and Feed Council v. United States Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Certain Railroads Represented by Southern Freight Association Eastern Railroads, New England Governors' Conference, Intervenors. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Boston and Maine Corporation, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Maine Central Railroad Company, and Norfolk and Western Railway Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, New England Governors' Conference, New England Grain & Feed Council, Intervenors
(t)here is no single 'reasonable' rate for a commodity. rather, there is a 'zone of reasonableness' within which carriers are free to adjust their rates at will
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
New England Grain & Feed Council v. United States Interstate Commerce Commission
here is no single 'reasonable' rate for a commodity. rather, there is a 'zone of reasonableness' within which carriers are free to adjust their rates at will
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
The Ripon Society, Inc. v. National Republican Party the Ripon Society, Inc. v. National Republican Party
(3×)
The Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case “with directions to enter a fresh decree from which a timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals.” 419 U.S. at 812, 95 S.Ct. at 26. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Antonia Paris v. Department of Housing and Urban Development
(2×)
See 419 U.S. at 812, 95 S.Ct. at 27.
cited
Cited "see"
Gholston v. Housing Authority Of The City Of Montgomery
See Fletcher v. Housing Auth. of Louisville, 491 F.2d 793, 798 (6th Cir.), vacated, 419 U.S. 812 , 95 S.Ct. 27 , 42 L.Ed.2d 39 (1974), reinstated on remand, 525 F.2d 532 (6th Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Gholston v. Housing Authority
See Fletcher v. Housing Auth. of Louisville, 491 F.2d 793, 798 (6th Cir.), vacated, 419 U.S. 812 , 95 S.Ct. 27 , 42 L.Ed.2d 39 (1974), reinstated on remand, 525 F.2d 532 (6th Cir.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
The Housing Authority Of The City Of Seattle v. State Of Washington
See Fletcher v. Housing Authority of Louisville, 491 F.2d 793 (6th Cir.), judgment vacated, 419 U.S. 812 , 95 S.Ct. 27 , 42 L.Ed.2d 39 (1974), judgment reinstated, 525 F.2d 532 (6th Cir. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Housing Authority v. Washington
See Fletcher v. Housing Authority of Louisville, 491 F.2d 793 (6th Cir.), judgment vacated, 419 U.S. 812 , 95 S.Ct. 27 , 42 L.Ed.2d 39 (1974), judgment reinstated, 525 F.2d 532 (6th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hotchner v. Castillo-Puche
See also Gordon v. Random House, Inc., 486 F.2d 1356 (3d Cir. 1973), vacated, 419 U.S. 812 , 95 S.Ct. 27 , 42 L.Ed.2d 39 (1974); Bon Air Hotel, Inc. v. Time, Inc., 426 F.2d 858 (5th Cir. 1970); Wasserman v. Time, Inc., 138 U.S.App.D.C. 7 , 424 F.2d 920 , cert. denied, 398 U.S. 940 , 90 S.Ct. 1844 , 26 L.Ed.2d 273 (1970).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Driskell
v.
Edwards, Governor of Louisiana
v.
Edwards, Governor of Louisiana
No. 73-1998.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1974.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)
Appeal from D. C. W. D. La. Judgment vacated and case remanded with directions to enter a fresh decree from which a timely appeal may be taken to the Court of Appeals. See Wilson v. City of Port Lavaca, 391 U. S. 352 (1968).