green
Positive treatment
Issue: upheld exceptionNJ ↗
Issue: establishment clauseNJ ↗
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.3 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
New England Grain & Feed Council v. United States Interstate Commerce Commission
there is no single 'reasonable' rate for a commodity. rather, there is a 'zone of reasonableness' within which carriers are free to adjust their rates at will
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
New England Grain and Feed Council v. United States Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Certain Railroads Represented by Southern Freight Association Eastern Railroads, New England Governors' Conference, Intervenors. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Boston and Maine Corporation, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Maine Central Railroad Company, and Norfolk and Western Railway Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, New England Governors' Conference, New England Grain & Feed Council, Intervenors
(t)here is no single 'reasonable' rate for a commodity. rather, there is a 'zone of reasonableness' within which carriers are free to adjust their rates at will
cited
Cited "see"
Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Rubin
See Jones v. Butz, 374 F.Supp. 1284, 1292-93 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff'd, 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 22 , 42 L.Ed.2d 36 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Rubin
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Jones v. Butz, 374 F.Supp. 1284 (S.D.N.Y.) (granting intervention application of seven individuals and five religious organizations because they had “an undoubted interest in the legislation under consideration ... as it affects the production of kosher meat”), affd 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 22 , 42 L.Ed.2d 36 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
George Barghout v. Bureau Of Kosher Meat And Food Control
See Jones v. Butz, 374 F.Supp. 1284, 1292 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 22 , 42 L.Ed.2d 36 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Barghout v. Bureau of Kosher Meat & Food Control
See Jones v. Butz, 374 F.Supp. 1284, 1292 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 22 , 42 L.Ed.2d 36 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ran-Dav's County Kosher, Inc. v. State
(2×)
County of Allegheny, supra, 492 U.S. at 613 n. 59, 109 S.Ct. at 3111 n. 59, 106 L.Ed. 2d at 507 n. 59; see Jones v. Butz, 374 F. Supp. 1284, 1292-93 (S.D.N.Y. 1974), aff'd, 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 22 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 36 (1974) (holding that the Humane Slaughter Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 1901 et seq. (1970), permissibly accommodates the free exercise of religion by exempting persons of Jewish faith from generally applicable statutory guidelines that proscribe practices mandated by the laws of kashrut). *166 The regulations at issue in this case do not constitute permissible accommodation of Orthodox Juda…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank v. State
(2×)
See, e. g., Jones v. Butz, 374 F.Supp. 1284, 1292 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d. mem., 419 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 22 , 42 L.Ed.2d 36 (1974), holding 7 U.S. C.A. § 1902(b) (Supp.1979), which exempts certain religiously prescribed methods of animal slaughter from the requirements of the Humane Slaughter Act, to be consistent with the establishment clause. .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Owens
v.
I. F. P. Corp., dba Olshine's Credit Clothing Co.
v.
I. F. P. Corp., dba Olshine's Credit Clothing Co.
No. 73-7082.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1974.
Cited by 29 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. W. D. Ky.