green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.0 score
“t is the order that is appealable, and not the controlling question identified by the district court. thus, the court of appeals may address any issue necessary to decide the ease before it.”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
In the Matter of the Lehigh and New England Railway Company, Debtor. United States of America, Erie Lackawanna, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenors in D.C. Appeal of Central Jersey Industries, Inc
(2×)
But see Erie's contentions reflected in note 10, infra 9 For an example of the relationship between the government lien, the secured creditors, and the sale of unmortgaged assets, see note 1 of Judge Rosenn's concurring opinion in In re Penn Central Transportation Co. (Columbus Option Case), 494 F.2d 270, 284 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974) 10 In light of our disposition, we have no need to address CJI's second argument, that the district court had failed to limit the priority which it gave to interline claims to just freight revenue received by L&N…
examined
Cited "but see"
United States v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.
(4×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
But see Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 860 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974). 22 .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lucien B. Calhoun Robin L. Calhoun, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Natalie K. Calhoun, Deceased v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. Palmas Del Mar Company Palmas Del Mar, Inc. Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Marina De Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Maxxam Properties, Inc. Abc Corporation Xyz Partnership(s) Candelero Hotel Corporation Marina De Palmas Shipyard, Inc. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. And Yamaha Motor Company, Ltd., in No. 93-1736 Lucien B. Calhoun Robin L. Calhoun, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Natalie K. Calhoun, Deceased, in No. 93-1737 v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. Palmas Del Mar Company Palmas Del Mar, Inc. Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Marina De Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Maxxam Properties, Inc. Abc Corporation Xyz Partnership(s) Candelero Hotel Corporation Marina De Palmas Shipyard, Inc
t is the order that is appealable, and not the controlling question identified by the district court. thus, the court of appeals may address any issue necessary to decide the case before it.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp.
t is the order that is appealable, and not the controlling question identified by the district court. thus, the court of appeals may address any issue necessary to decide the ease before it.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Process Gas Consumers Group v. U. S. Department of Agriculture
In American Smelting & Refining Co. v. FPC, 494 F.2d 925 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.ct. 148, 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974), we remanded to the Commission for reconsideration an order using a different standard for computing curtailment allocations for one group of customers than for another. .I am puzzled by the majority opinion’s reference to the “mammoth assessment of historical usage” involved in use of the base year method, maj. op. at 749.
cited
Cited "see"
Brass v. American Film Technologies, Inc.
See Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc., 487 F.2d 640, 644 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanford Brass v. American Film Technologies, Inc.
See Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc., 487 F.2d 640, 644 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974). 11 In an order dated December 18, 1991, the district court rejected Brass' conversion claims.
discussed
Cited "see"
Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Kezer
See Cummings Wholesale Electric Co. v. Home Owners Insurance Co., 492 F.2d 268 (7th Cir.1974), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 149 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974) (claim of policyholder against reinsurer not preferred claim); Knickerbocker Agency, Inc. v. Holz, 4 N.Y.2d 245 , 173 N.Y.S.2d 602 , 149 N.E.2d 885 (1958) (liquidation statute grants court exclusive jurisdiction over assets to exclusion of arbitrator’s authority under private contract with insolvent insurance company).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. A Parcel of Land
See Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820, 822-23 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974) (questions on immunity, which are purely legal in nature, are appropriate for resolution by way of an interlocutory appeal); Mattioni, supra, at 917 (an issue is controlling where “if erroneous, [it] would be reversible error on final appeal”); cf. Von Bulow by Auersperg v. Von Bulow, 634 F.Supp. 1284, 1312-13 (S.D.N.Y.1986), aff'd, 811 F.2d 136 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1015 , 107 S.Ct. 1891 , 95 L.Ed.2d 498 (1987) (certification is not appropriate with respe…
discussed
Cited "see"
48 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1010, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,460 Richard Sperling, Frederick Hemsley and Joseph Zelauskas, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc., a New Jersey Corporation
See Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820, 822-23 (3d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974) (confining scope of review to controlling question of law and not factual issues presented in question certified by district court). 25 We are also concerned that if this court were to expand our jurisdiction to include jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc.
See Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820, 822-23 (3d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974) (confining scope of review to controlling question of law and not factual issues presented in question certified by district court).
cited
Cited "see"
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Edelman
See Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 854 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Debtor. Appeal of FARMERS COOPERATIVE ELEVATOR, RAKE, IOWA
(2×)
See In re Penn Central Transportation Co., 494 F.2d 270, 273-75 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974); Section 77(o) of the old Bankruptcy Act (formerly codified at 11 U.S.C. § 205 (o) (1970)).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,643 Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company and First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A. v. Arthur Andersen & Co., Security Pacific National Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
See Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820, 822-23 (3 Cir.1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
See Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820, 822-23 (3 Cir.1973), Cert, denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Cities of Lakeland & Tallahassee, & Gainesville Regional Utilities v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The Lake Worth Utilities Authority and the Utilities Commission of New Smyrna Beach, Florida v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See American Smelting & Refining Co. v. FPC, 494 F.2d 925 , 948 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Cities of Lakeland & Tallahassee, & Gainesville Regional Utilities v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See American Smelting & Refining Co. v. FPC, 494 F.2d 925 , 948 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Process Gas Consumers Group v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
See American Smelting & Refining Co. v. FPC, 494 F.2d 925 , 936 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974) (end use plans do not reallocate natural gas within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. § 717f(a)); North Carolina v. FERC, 584 F.2d 1003, 1007 (D.C.Cir. 1978) (end use plans are not per se discriminatory).
discussed
Cited "see"
Consolidated Edison Co. v. Commission
(2×)
See American Smelting & Refining Co. v. FPC, 494 F.2d 925 , 936 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Consolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See American Smelting & Refining Co. v. FPC, 494 F.2d 925 , 936 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Avnet, Inc. v. Scope Industries
See Missouri Portland Cement Company v. Cargill, Incorporated, 498 F.2d 851, 873 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974). 7 There appears to be no basis for requiring more when a private party initiates suit.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust Litigation
See Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820, 822-23 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974) 17 "In appearing in his professional capacity before a tribunal, a lawyer shall not: . . . (6) Engage in undignified or discourteous conduct which is degrading to a tribunal." ABA Code of Professional Responsibility DR 7-106(C) 1 The particular value of the seventh amendment is discussed in Part II E, infra 2 Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 546-47 , 94 S.Ct. 1372, 1383-84 , 39 L.Ed.2d 577 (1974); Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Auth., 297 U.S. 288, 346-48 , 56 S.Ct. 41…
cited
Cited "see"
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.
See Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820, 822-23 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Foremost Life Insurance v. Department of Insurance
See Cummings Wholesale Electric Company, Inc. v. Home Owners Insurance Company, 492 F.2d 268 (7th Cir. 1974) cert. denied, Delphi Community School Building Corp. v. Northeastern Insurance Company of Hartford, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 149 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,589 Jo v. Seibert v. Sperry Rand Corporation and James D. Finley
Although the underlying philosophy of federal securities regulations is that of full disclosure, Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Curtiss-Wright Corp., 584 F.2d 1195, 1199 (2d Cir. 1978), “there is no duty to disclose information to one who reasonably should already be aware of it.” Myzel v. Fields, 386 F.2d 718, 736 (8th Cir. 1967), cert, denied, 390 U.S. 951 , 88 S.Ct. 1043 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1143 (1968); see Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 873 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kennecott Copper Corporation v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation
See Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 868-70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); FTC v. PepsiCo, Inc., 447 F.2d 24 , 28-31 (2d Cir. 1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Dewitt v. American Stock Transfer Co.
See Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc., 487 F.2d 640 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
DeWitt v. AMERICAN STOCK TR. CO.
See Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc., 487 F.2d 640 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
VERNON J. ROCKLER & CO., INC. v. Minneapolis Shareholders Co.
See, Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851 (2nd Cir. 1974) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974) and Commonwealth Oil Refining Co., Inc. v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp., 394 F.Supp. 267 (S.D.N.Y. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Applied Digital Data Systems Inc. v. Milgo Electronic Corp.
See Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 871 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Gulf & Western Indus., Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 476 F.2d 687 , 695-96 (2d Cir. 1973); GAF Corp. v. Milstein, 453 F.2d 709, 719-20 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 910 , 92 S.Ct. 1610 , 31 L.Ed.2d 821 (1972) (target corporation has standing to assert violations of sections 14(d) & (e) and 13(d)); Butler Aviation Int’l, Inc. v. Comprehensive Designers, Inc., 425 F.2d 842 , 843 n.1 (2d Cir. 1970) (target corporation has st…
discussed
Cited "see"
CHARTER OAK BK. & TRUST CO. v. Registrar & Transfer Co.
See Edina State Bank v. Mr. Steak, Inc. 487 F. 2d 640, 644 (10 Cir.1974) cert. den. 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 123 (1974). [3] However, where state law cannot be harmonized *434 with, or would be in conflict with, the Securities Act, the state law must yield to the federal law.
discussed
Cited "see"
Otis Elevator Co. v. United Technologies Corp.
However, the Court will also consider the general condition of this tender offer in light of all the foregoing events. 12 The Applicable Standard It is clear in this Circuit that a preliminary injunction will issue against *965 the consummation of an ongoing tender offer “only upon a clear showing of either (1) probable success on the merits and possible irreparable injury, or (2) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly toward the party requesting the preliminary relief.” Sonesta International…
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth Oil Refining Co. v. Tesoro Petroleum Corp.
Accord, Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 866 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 476 F.2d 687, 692-93 (2 Cir. 1973); Broder v. Dane, 384 F.Supp. 1312, 1317 (S.D.N.Y.1974); General Host Corp. v. Triumph American, Inc., 359 F.Supp. 749, 753 (S.D.N.Y.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc.
See Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820, 823 (3 Cir. 1973), cert. denied sub nom., Cronrath v. Johnson, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Howard Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Incorporated
See Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820, 823 (3 Cir. 1973), cert. denied sub nom., Cronrath v. Johnson, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Penn Central Transportation Co.
(2×)
See In re Penn Central Transportation Co., 494 F.2d 270 , 283 n. 13 (3d Cir. 1974) (Columbus Option), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 , 43 U.S.L.W. 3190 (U.S. Oct. 15, 1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, Debtor. Appeal of Richard Joyce Smith, Trustee of the Property of the New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Company, No. 74-1362. Appeal of Bank of New York, No. 74-1447
(2×)
See In re Penn Central Transportation Co., 494 F.2d 270 , 283 n. 13 (3d Cir. 1974) (Columbus Option), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 , 43 U.S.L.W. 3190 (U.S. Oct. 15, 1974). 5 Appellants' standing to object to the proposed arrangement is entirely dependent upon their status as creditors and stockholders allegedly being subjected to an uncompensated taking by virtue of such erosion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Azurite Corp. Ltd. v. Amster & Co.
Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp., 409 F.2d 937, 948 (2d Cir.1969) ("It would be as serious an infringement of these regulations to overstate the definiteness of the plans as to understate them."); see also Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 872 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Susquehanna Corp. v. Pan American Sulphur Co., 423 F.2d 1075, 1085-86 (5th Cir.1970). 20 Subsequent cases have followed a similar path, even after Item 4 was amended in 1978.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Azurite Corp. v. Amster & Co.
Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp., 409 F.2d 937, 948 (2d Cir.1969) (“It would be as serious an infringement of these regulations to overstate the definiteness of the plans as to understate them.”); see also Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 872 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Susquehanna Corp. v. Pan American Sulphur Co., 423 F.2d 1075, 1085-86 (5th Cir.1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Royal Crown Cola Co., Cross-Appellant v. The Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico, Inc., and Dr. Pepper Co., Cross-Appellees
Compare e.g., Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974) with FTC Dkt.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cletis Meredith Miller v. William Bolger, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service and the United States of America
It follows that we are free to consider “all grounds advanced in support of the grant of summary judgment and all grounds suggested for sustaining its denial.” Struble v. New Jersey Brewery Employees Welfare Trust Fund, 732 F. 2d 325 , 336 n. 10 (3d Cir.1984) (quoting Consolidated Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Association, Inc., 602 F.2d 494 , 502 (3d Cir.1979), vacated on other grounds, 448 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 3040 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1131 (1980)); see also Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820, 822-23 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles Woods v. Evansville Press Company, Inc., the E.W. Scripps Company
New York Times, supra, 376 U.S. at 266 , 84 S.Ct. at 718 ; see also, Perry v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 499 F.2d 797, 802 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mohammad Sami v. United States of America
See, e. g., Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974) (destruction of plaintiff’s legal materials taken from another inmate’s prison cell held ministerial; issuance of prison regulations governing such destruction held discretionary); David v. Cohen, supra, 132 U.S.App.D.C. at 337 , 407 F.2d at 1272 (decision to issue tax levy when taxes already paid held discretionary).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,833 Prudent Real Estate Trust v. Johncamp Realty, Inc.
From the beginning of litigation under the Williams Act, this court has been conscious of its responsibility not to allow management to “resort to the courts on trumped-up or trivial grounds as a means for delaying and thereby defeating legitimate tender offers.” Electronic Specialty Co. v. International Controls Corp., 409 F.2d 937, 947 (1969); see also Missouri Portland Cement Co. v. Cargill, Inc., 498 F.2d 851, 854, 873 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Briggs v. Goodwin
See, e. g., Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820 , 824-25 & n. 2 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974); Whirl v. Kern, 407 F.2d 781, 790-92 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 901 , 90 S.Ct. 210 , 24 L.Ed.2d 177 (1969), modified, Bryan v. Jones, 530 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1976) (en banc ; six opinions); Cooper v. O'Connor, 69 App.D.C. 100, 102 , 99 F.2d 135 , 137 & n. 2, cert. denied, 305 U.S. 643 , 59 S.Ct. 146 , 83 L.Ed. 414 (1938).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Briggs v. Goodwin
See, e. g., Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820 , 824-25 & n. 2 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974); Whirl v. Kern, 407 F.2d 781, 790-92 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 901 , 90 S.Ct. 210 , 24 L.Ed.2d 177 (1969), modified, Bryan v. Jones, 530 F.2d 1210 (5th Cir. 1976) (en banc ; six opinions); Cooper v. O’Connor, 69 App.D.C. 100, 102 , 99 F.2d 135 , 137 & n. 2, cert. denied, 305 U.S. 643 , 59 S.Ct. 146 , 83 L.Ed. 414 (1938).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hutchinson v. Proxmire
Corp., 396 F.Supp. 1042, 1053 (S.D.N.Y.1975), aff’d, 538 F.2d 309 (2d Cir. 1976); see also, Perry v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 499 F.2d 797 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 150 , 42 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974); Cervantes v. Time, Inc., 464 F.2d 986 (8th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1125 , 93 S.Ct. 939 , 35 L.Ed.2d 257 (1973); Washington Post Co. v. Keogh, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 32 , 365 F.2d 965, 968 (1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1011 , 87 S.Ct. 708 , 17 L.Ed.2d 548 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Leon F. Akerly v. Red Barn System, Inc. Appeal of Harrisburg Barns, Inc.
See also Johnson v. Alldredge, 488 F.2d 820 (3d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 882 , 95 S.Ct. 148 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974). 8 . 496 F.2d at 755 . 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Penn Central Transportation Company, Debtor. Appeal of United States of America. In the Matter of Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, Debtor. Appeal of R. D. Timpany, Trustee of the Property of the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey
(2×)
See, e. g., In re Penn Central Transportation Co. (Columbus Options), 494 F.2d 270 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 883 , 95 S.Ct. 147 , 42 L.Ed.2d 122 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Bankers Trust Co., Trustees
v.
Bankers Trust Co., Trustees
No. 73-1672.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1974.
Cited by 125 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Third Circuit (2)
C. A. 3d Cir. Motion to substitute Bank of New York et al. in place of Morgan Guaranty-Trust Company of New York as parties respondent granted. Certiorari denied.