Swank v. Rodriguez, 419 U.S. 885 (1974). · Go Syfert
Search
Swank v. Rodriguez, 419 U.S. 885 (1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
433 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 97 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: UNITED CONS. FIN. SER. v. Carbo (njsuperctappdiv, 2009-10-22) · Strongest negative: Roofing & Sheet Metal Services, Inc. v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc. (ca11, 1982-10-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Roofing & Sheet Metal Services, Inc. v. La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc.
11th Cir. · 1982 · signal: but see · confidence high
Although the transfer order was, as we see it, probably not appealable to the Eighth Circuit, see Garner v. Wolfinbarger, 5 Cir. 1970, 433 F.2d 117, 120 ; but see Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 3 Cir. 1974, 496 F.2d 747, 755-56 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 , we consider that the appellant had the opportunity to secure appellate review.
cited Cited "but see" Exxon Corp. v. Federal Energy Administration
Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. · 1975 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 3 Cir., 496 F.2d 747, 752-756 , cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" UNITED CONS. FIN. SER. v. Carbo
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F. 2d 747, 770 (3d Cir.) (Aldisert, C.J., dissenting) (discussing frequent application of Ratner in unpublished decisions, criticizing the majority's decision to avoid addressing the issue decided in Ratner and disagreeing with Ratner ), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 125 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders
D.N.J. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Levine v. United Healthcare Corp., 285 F.Supp.2d 552, 556-57 (D.N.J. 2003) (citing Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 754-55 (3d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974)).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Loc Tien Nguyen
E.D. Va. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87 , 139 n. 23, 94 S.Ct. 2887 , 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974), reh'g denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 157 , 42 L.Ed.2d 129 (1974). 8 .
discussed Cited "see" Green v. Fund Asset Management, L.P.
D.N.J. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 754 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974) (requiring that the district judge certify that the order satisfies all three criteria).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Consolidated Parlodel Litigation
D.N.J. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 755-56 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974); see also Nascone v. Spudnuts, Inc., 735 F.2d 763, 765 (3d Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see" Tischio v. Bontex, Inc.
D.N.J. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
The Order of Transfer does not involve “a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion” such that “an immediate appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.” 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b); see Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 754 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974); Avellino v. Herron, 991 F.Supp. 730, 734 (E.D.Pa.1998).
discussed Cited "see" Gilman v. Wheat, First Securities, Inc.
Md. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 519 , 94 S.Ct. 2449, 2457 , 41 L.Ed.2d 270, 280-81 , reh’g denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 157 , 42 L.Ed.2d 129 (1974) (enforcing an arbitration clause as “a specialized kind of forum-selection clause....”); Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, 473 U.S. 614, 631 , *378 105 S.Ct. 3346, 3356 , 87 L.Ed.2d 444, 458 (1985) (“The Bremen and Scherk establish a strong presumption in favor of enforcement of freely negotiated contractual choice-of-forum provisions[ ]”); Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp., 487 U.S. 22, 29-31 …
cited Cited "see" Robert A. Georgine Laverne Winbun, of the Estate of Joseph E. Winbun, Deceased, and in Her Own Right Ambrose Vogt, Jr. Joanne Vogt, His Wife Carlos Raver Dorothy M. Raver, His Wife Timothy Murphy Gay Murphy, His Wife Ty T. Annas Anna Marie Baumgartner, of the Estate of John A. Baumgartner, Deceased Nafssica Kekrides, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Pavlos Kekrides, Deceased William H. Sylvester, and Personal Representative of the Estate of Fred A. Sylvester, Deceased v. Amchem Products, Inc. A.P. Green Industries, Inc. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Certainteed Corporation C.E. Thurston & Sons, Inc. Dana Corporation Ferodo America, Inc. Flexitallic, Inc. Gaf Building Materials, Inc. I.U. North America, Inc. Maremont Corporation Asbestos Claims Management Corp National Services Industries, Inc. Nosroc Corporation Pfizer, Inc. Quigley Company, Inc. Shook & Fletcher Insulation Company T & N, Plc Union Carbide Corporation United States Gypsum Company v. Admiral Insurance Company Affiliated Fm Insurance Company Aiu Insurance Company Allianz Insurance Company Allianz Underwriters Insurance Company, Individually and as Successor to Allianz Underwriters, Inc. Allstate Insurance Company, as Successor to Northbrook Excess and Surplus Insurance Company American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida American Centennial Insurance Company American Home Assurance Company American Motorists Insurance Company American Re-Insurance Company Appalachian Insurance Company of Providence Argonaut Insurance Company Atlanta International Insurance Company Caisse Industrielle D'AssurAnce Mutuelle C.E. Heath Compensation and Liability Insurance Company as Successor to Employers' Surplus Line Insurance Company Centennial Insurance Company Central National Insurance Company of Omaha Chicago Insurance Company City Insurance Company Colonia Versicherung Aktiengesellschaft Columbia Casualty Company Commercial Union Insurance Company, as Successor to Columbia Casualty Company, Employers Commercial Union Insurance Company, Employers Commercial Union Insurance Company of America, and Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation Limited Compagnie Europeenne De Reassurances the Constitution State Insurance Company Continental Casualty Company Employers Mutual Casualty Company Evanston Insurance Company Executive Re Indemnity Inc., as Successor to American Excess Insurance Company Federal Insurance Company General Reinsurance Corporation Gibraltar Casualty Company Government Employees Insurance Company Granite State Insurance Company Highlands Insurance Company the Home Indemnity Company the Home Insurance Company Houston General Insurance Company Hudson Insurance Company Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania Interstate Fire & Casualty Company Jefferson Insurance Company of New York Landmark Insurance Company La Preservatrice Fonciere Tiard, Individually and as Successor to La Fonciere Assurances Transports Accidents and La Preservatrice Le Secours Lexington Insurance Company Lilloise D'assurances, as Sucessor to Lilloise D'AssurAnces Et De Reassurances Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company Maryland Casualty Company Michigan Mutual Insurance Company Mutuelle Generale Francaise National American Insurance Company of California, as Successor to the Stuyvesant Insurance Company National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa Northbrook Indemnity Company North Star Reinsurance Corporation Old Republic Insurance Company Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Association Insurance Company the Protective National Insurance Company of Omaha Prudential Reinsurance Company Puritan Insurance Company, Individually and as Successor to the Manhattan Fire and Marine Insurance Company Ranger Insurance Company Republic Insurance Company Safeco Insurance Company of America Safety National Casualty Corporation, as Successor to Safety Mutual Casualty Corporation St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Individually and as Successor to Birmingham Fire Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company Stonewall Insurance Company Steonewall Surplus Lines Insurance Company Sun Alliance and London Insurance Plc Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Company, Limited the Travelers Indemnity Company the Travelers Insurance Company Unigard Security Insurance Company, as Successor to Unigard Mutual Insurance Company Union Des Assurances De Paris Yosemite Insurance Company Eurinco Allegemeine Versicherungs, A.G. F & M Insurance Company, Ltd. La Concorde Lexington Insurance Company, Ltd. L'Union Atlantique S.A. D'AssurAnces N v. Rotterdamse Assurantiekas Per Mees & Zoonen National Continental Insurance Company as Successor to American Star Insurance Company Newfoundland American Insurance Co., Ltd. New Hampshire Insurance Company, Ltd. Phoenix Assurance Reliance Insurance Company Sirius (Uk) Insurance Company, Plc Trident General Insurance Company Great American Insurance Company American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance Company, as Authorized Agent on Behalf of Transport Indemnity Company. George Windsor Constance Windsor, Michael Windsor and Karen Windsor, in Nos. 94-1925, 94-2009. White Lung Association of New Jersey, National Asbestos Victims Legal Action Organizing Committee, the Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers International Union, the Skilled Trades Association, Myles O'malley, Marta Figueroa, Robert Fiore, Roh Maher, and Lynn Maher, (In Her Own Behalf and as Next Friend for Her Minor Children, Jessica Marie Maher, Jamie Marion Maher, and Jennifer Megan Maher), in Nos. 94-1927, 94-1968. Richard R. Preston, Sr. And Louis C. Anderson, in Nos. 94-1928, 94-2013. Albert and Margaret Hertler, in No. 94-1929. Richard E. Blanchard, D.D.S., Jack S. Boston, James L. Anderson, Personal Representative of Robert L. Anderson and Harrison O. McLeod in Nos. 94-1930, 94-2066. Iona Cunningham, as Representative of the Estate of Charles Cunningham, and Twila Sneed, in Nos. 94-1931, 94-2010. Aileen Cargile, Betty Francom, John Wong, John Soteriou, Harold Hans Emmerich and Thomas Corey, in Nos. 94-1932, 94-2012. William J. Golt, Sr. And Phyllis Golt, in Nos. 94-1960, 94-2011. Joe and Lynne Dominguez, in No. 94-2067. Kathryn Toy, Individually, and as Representative of the Estate of Edward Toy, in Nos. 94-2068. John Paul Smith, in No. 94-2085. Casimir Balonis, Margaret Balonis and Shepard A. Hoffman, in No. 95-1705.
3rd Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 757 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 757 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Adams v. Burlington Northern Railroad
D. Kan. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 755 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974) (holding that a question is “controlling” if error in its resolution would warrant reversal of a final judgment or dismissal).
discussed Cited "see" Piazza v. Major League Baseball
E.D. Pa. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 754 (3d Cir.) (“[T]he district judge must certify that the order satisfies the three criteria.”), cert, denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974). 2 Controlling Question of Law In the Third Circuit, a controlling issue of law is one that “would result in a reversal of a judgment after final hearing.” Katz, 496 F.2d at 755 .
cited Cited "see" Shaw v. Whirlpool Financial Corp. (In Re the Appliance Store, Inc.)
Bankr. W.D. Pa. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 756 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Fechter v. Connecticut General Life Insurance
E.D. Pa. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 754 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974) (leave to appeal may be denied based on the desire to have a full record before considering the disputed legal question).
cited Cited "see" Zinberg v. Washington Bancorp, Inc.
D.N.J. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 756 (3d Cir.1974) cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Air Crash Disaster at Stapleton International Airport
D. Colo. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 758-62 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974). 11 In this section, we overrule plaintiffs’ objections to the procedures employed at trial and find that plaintiffs were provided a full and fair opportunity to litigate their claims for punitive damages and against Texas Air Corporation pursuant to the trial plan.
discussed Cited "see" Crescent International, Inc. v. Avatar Communities, Inc. And Smede International, Inc.
3rd Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Scherck v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506 , 94 S.Ct. 2449 , 41 L.Ed.2d 270 reh’g den. 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 157 , 42 L.Ed.2d 129 (1974); M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 , 92 S.Ct. 1907 , 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972); Central Contracting Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 367 F.2d 341 (3d Cir.1966); Manrique v. Fabbri, 493 So.2d 437 (Fla.1986); Central Contracting Co. v. C.E.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Mayes
N.C. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87 , 41 L.Ed. 2d 590 , reh’g denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 129 (1974) (statewide standard not required); Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 1498 (1956) (fact that different juries could reach different results as to whether same material is obscene is normal consequence of jury system).
discussed Cited "see" Sharon R. SMITH Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PAPP CLINIC, P.A., Defendant-Appellee (2×)
11th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hamling v. U.S., 418 U.S. 87, 124 , 94 S.Ct. 2887, 2911 , 41 L.Ed.2d 590 reh'g denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 157 , 42 L.Ed.2d 129 (1974); U.S. v. Bell, 678 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982), aff'd 462 U.S. 356 , 103 S.Ct. 2398 , 76 L.Ed.2d 638 (1983); Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Falgoust, 386 F.2d 248, 253 (5th Cir.1967).
discussed Cited "see" McClendon v. Continental Group, Inc.
D.N.J. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 756 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974) (setting forth guidelines for appellate review of Rule 23(b)(3) certification); see also Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 561 F.2d 434, 448 (3d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1280 , 55 L.Ed.2d 791 (1978) (following Katz).
discussed Cited "see" Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc. v. Richal Shipping Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506, 510-11 , 94 S.Ct. 2449, 2452-53 , 41 L.Ed.2d 270 reh’g denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 157 , 42 L.Ed.2d 129 (1974); China Union Lines, Ltd. v. American Marine Underwriters, Inc., 458 F.Supp. 132, 135 (S.D.N.Y.1978). 15 Alafouzos The remaining question is whether Alafouzos, as guarantor of Richal, must participate in the arbitration. 16 It is clear that nonsignatories to a contract containing an arbitration clause may be deemed parties thereto, through ordinary contract principles, for purposes of the Act.
discussed Cited "see" La Societe Nationale Pour La Recherche, La Production, Le Transport, La Transformation Et La Commercialisation Des Hydrocarbures v. Shaheen Natural Resources Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Scherk v. Alberto Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506 , 520 n. 15, 94 S.Ct. 2449 , 2457 n. 15, 41 L.Ed.2d 270 reh’g denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 157 , 42 L.Ed.2d 129 (1974); Parsons & Whittemore Overseas Co., Inc. v. Societe Generale de L’Industrie du Papier (RAKTA), 508 F.2d 969, 974 (2d Cir.1974).
cited Cited "see" Pruet Production Co. v. Ayles
S.D. Miss. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 753-56 (3rd Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Alan McSurely v. John L. McClellan Thomas Ratliff, Individually and as Sometime Commonwealth Attorney for Pike County, Kentucky
D.C. Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
Provided, however, That application for an appeal hereunder shall not stay proceedings in the district court unless the district judge or [this court] shall so order. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (b) (emphasis in original); see Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 753-56 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Forsyth v. Kleindienst
E.D. Pa. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 756 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974); McNulty v. Borden, Inc., 474 F.Supp. 1111 (E.D.Pa. 1979); In re Magic Marker Securities Litigation, 472 F.Supp. 436 (E.D.Pa.1979).
cited Cited "see" In Re Pyramid Co. of Burlington
Vt. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747 , *303 755 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement Company
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 755 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974); Hadjipateras v. Pacifica, S.A., 290 F.2d 697, 702-03 (5th Cir. 1961).
discussed Cited "see" Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 755 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974); Hadjipateras v. Pacifica, S.A., 290 F.2d 697, 702-03 (5th Cir. 1961).
cited Cited "see" 33 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1147, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,796 Kyriaki Cleo Kyriazi, Individually and on Behalf of All Those Similarly Situated v. Western Electric Company Ralph Boyd, Individually and in His Capacity as Agent for Western Electric and Fred Wilser, Individually and in His Capacity as Agent for Western Electric, James Snyder, Robert Armstrong and S. \Teddy\" Liu
unknown court · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corporation, 496 F.2d 747, 758-59 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974)
cited Cited "see" Kyriazi v. Western Electric Co.
unknown court · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corporation, 496 F.2d 747, 758-59 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974).
cited Cited "see" Dyke v. Gulf Oil Corp.
Temp. Emerg. Ct. App. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974).
cited Cited "see" Weber v. School Dist. of Philadelphia
E.D. Pa. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 752-56 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974).
cited Cited "see" Dale S. Bogus v. American Speech & Hearing Association
3rd Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 758-62 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Winifred S. NANCE, Appellee, v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, CONSUMER PRODUCTS DIVISION, a Corporation, Appellant
4th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corporation (3d Cir. 1974) 496 F.2d 747, 760 , cert. denied 419 U. S. 885 , 5 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974): “* * * the plaintiff, not the judicial system, controls whether or not to ask for class action treatment.” (Emphasis added) 3 .
discussed Cited "see" Chevalier v. Baird Savings Ass'n
E.D. Pa. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 53 F.R.D. 539, 546 (W.D.Pa.1971), rev’d on other grounds, 496 F.2d 747 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974); cf. Partain v. First National Bank, 59 F.R.D. 56, 62 (M.D.Ala.1973) (citing cases).
cited Cited "see" McIlhenny v. American Title Insurance
E.D. Pa. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 758-60 (3d Cir.), cert. denied 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974). 2 .
cited Cited "see" Rauch v. United Instruments, Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Katz v. Carte Blanche Corporation, 496 F.2d 747 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" Jay S. Zeltzer, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche Corporation (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747 (3d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974). 4 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Commander Properties Corp. v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
D. Kan. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 758-763 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974) (discussing the use of a “test case” as an alternative to class certification); Yeager’s Fuel, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co., 162 F.R.D. 482, 488-89 (E.D.Pa.1995); Yanai v. Frito Lay, Inc., 61 F.R.D. 349, 353 (N.D.Ohio 1973).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re Potash Antitrust Litigation
D. Minnesota · 1995 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Fogie v. Rent-A-Center, Inc,, 867 F.Supp. 1398, 1404 (D.Minn.1993), citing Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 762 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
2d Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
This rule reads as follows: “If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise.” In general, “[a] trial judge has broad discretion in applying the rule, and his actions will be sustained unless ‘manifestly erroneous.’” United States v. Roldan-Zapata, 916 F.2d 795, 805 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1397 , 113 L.Ed.2d 453 (1991…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. The Port Authority Of New York And New Jersey
2d Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
This rule reads as follows: "If scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in the form of an opinion or otherwise." In general, "[a] trial judge has broad discretion in applying the rule, and his actions will be sustained unless 'manifestly erroneous.' " United States v. Roldan-Zapata, 916 F.2d 795, 805 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1397 , 113 L.Ed.2d 453 (1991) …
cited Cited "see, e.g." Saldana v. City of Camden
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F. 2d 747, 757 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed. 2d 125 (1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Blair
N.D. Cal. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
This construction of the extortion accurately places Blair’s actions “under col- or of official right.” See United States v. Blackwood, 768 F.2d 131, 138 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 569 , 88 L.Ed.2d 554 (1985) (victim could have reasonably believed that police officer’s position in traffic court unit of city police department enabled him to keep his promise to influence judicial decisions by passing bribes on to judges in traffic court, such that officer’s extortion was "under color of official right" for purposes of Hobbs Act prosecution); see also Hamling v.…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." V-1 Oil Co. v. People
Wyo. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87 , 94 S.Ct. 2887 , 41 L.Ed.2d 590 , reh’g denied 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 157 , 42 L.Ed.2d 129 (1974); Snyder v. Buck, 340 U.S. 15 , 71 S.Ct. 93 , 95 L.Ed. 15 (1950); Hardy v. Western Landscape Const., 141 Cal.App.3d 1015 , 190 Cal.Rptr. 766 (1983); Wilson v. Clark, 414 So.2d 526 (Fla.App.1982); Pieper, 126 N.W.2d 865 ; and Reickhoff v. Consolidated Gas Co., 123 Mont. 555 , 217 P.2d 1076, 1080 (1950). 7 There is no finality to the proceeding until *1204 the appeal is concluded.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Treadwell
N.C. Ct. App. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
As to the comparable materials evidence exclusion, it is well established that “[e]vidence of mere availability of similar materials is not by itself sufficiently probative of community standards to be admissible in the absence of proof that the material enjoys a reasonable degree of community acceptance.” State v. Mayes, 323 N.C. 159, 169 , 371 S.E.2d 476, 482 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1009 , 102 L.Ed.2d 784 (1989); see also Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 125-26 , 41 L.Ed.2d 590, 625-26 , reh’g denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 42 L.Ed.2d 129 (1974); State v. Anderson, 322 N.C. 22, 32…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ronald Newsom Hasan Sharif Eddie J. McMillan and Donald Wolverton v. Steve Norris, Commissioner Michael Dutton, Warden and David Hindman (2×)
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1785, at 92; see also, Katz v. Carte Blanche Corp., 496 F.2d 747, 760 (3rd Cir.1974) (“[T]he plaintiff, not the judicial system, controls whether or not to ask for class action treatment.”), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 152 , 42 L.Ed.2d 125 (1974); Nance v. Union Carbide Corp., Consumer Prods.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kam
Haw. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 141 (Brennan, J., dissenting, joined by Stewart, J., and Marshall, J.), reh’g denied, 419 U.S. 885 (1974); United States v. Thirty-Seven Photographs, 402 U.S. 363, 379 (Black, J., dissenting), reh’g denied, 403 U.S. 924 (1971); see also Smith v. United States, 431 U.S. 291, 311 (1977) (Stevens, J., dissenting).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Mayes (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87 , 94 S.Ct. 2887 , 41 L.Ed.2d 590 , reh'g denied, 419 U.S. 885 , 95 S.Ct. 157 , 42 L.Ed.2d 129 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Swank, Director, Department of Public Aid of Illinois
v.
Rodriguez
No. 74-89.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1974.
419 U.S. 885
Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent Rodriguez for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.