United States v. Peltier, 419 U.S. 993 (1974). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Peltier, 419 U.S. 993 (1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“in our view the willing acceptance of misappropriated union funds by a recipient who knows that such funds are unauthorized and illegal will constitute a violation of 501(c)”
40 citation events across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. J Michael Oliva (ca3, 1995-01-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. J Michael Oliva
3rd Cir. · 1995 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
in our view the willing acceptance of misappropriated union funds by a recipient who knows that such funds are unauthorized and illegal will constitute a violation of 501(c)
discussed Cited "see" Sears, Roebuck and Co., a Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission (2×)
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See National Dynamics Corp. v. FTC, 492 F.2d 1333, 1335-36 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 993 , 95 S.Ct. 303 , 42 L.Ed.2d 265 (1974).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Robert Andreen
9th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sullivan, 498 F.2d 146 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 993 , 95 S.Ct. 303 , 42 L.Ed.2d 265 (1974).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Matter of Seymour A. Gopman. United States of America v. Seymour A. Gopman (2×)
5th Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Sullivan, 498 F.2d 146, 150 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 993 , 95 S.Ct. 303 , 42 L.Ed.2d 265 (1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Peltier
No. 73-2000.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 11, 1974.
419 U.S. 993
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 84%
Citer courts: Third Circuit (1)

C. A. 9th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Case set for oral argument with No. 73-2050, United States v. Ortiz, ante, p. 824; No. 73-6848, Bowen v. United States, ante, p. 824; and No. 74-114, United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, ante, p. 824.