green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
12.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1984 ·
…it well may be that all morrissey contemplates ... a right to confront and cross-examine such adverse witnesses as appear ...
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1991 ·
…such a reading of the savings clause is consistent with the rule that savings clauses are to be broadly construed.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Al Taylor
(2×)
But see, e. g., United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1330 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975). 3 Turner does not make the argument that acquittal on the substantive count makes this evidence inadmissible in connection with the conspiracy count, nor could he in the light of United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337 , 1344 n.9 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Franklin Federal Savings Bank v. Director, Office Of Thrift Supervision
such a reading of the savings clause is consistent with the rule that savings clauses are to be broadly construed.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Franklin Federal Savings Bank v. Director, Office of Thrift Supervision
such a reading of the savings clause is consistent with the rule that savings clauses are to be broadly construed.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jaksa v. Regents of University of Michigan
(2×)
it well may be that all morrissey contemplates ... a right to confront and cross-examine such adverse witnesses as appear ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Graham Franklin Anderson, United States of America v. Claude Vance Cooley
. . . t the conspiracy that in some instances must be inferred largely from the series of criminal offenses committed.
cited
Cited "see"
Los Fresnos Consolidated Independent School District and Michael L. Williams, Commissioner of Education v. Jorge Vazquez
See Boykins v. Fairfield Board of Educ., 492 F.2d 697, 701 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied 420 U.S. 962 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Hopi Tribe v. United States
See Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Morton, 499 F.2d 1095, 1097 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975); Canadian St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Clancy v. Commissioner of Correctional Services
See Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 , 92 S.Ct. 763 , 31 L.Ed.2d 104 (1972), United States v. Seijo, 514 F.2d 1357 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1043 , 97 S.Ct. 745 , 50 L.Ed.2d 756 (1977), and United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323 (2d Cir.1974), ce rt. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975)). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eddie Harris, Delaine Gipson, Gilbert Harris, Sheila Boykin, Anthony McFadden and Liz Jones, Edward Guy
See, United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1340 (2d Cir.1974), (cautioning the prosecution that it is exposing itself to reversal by bringing multi count indictments against numerous defendants and proceeding to trial against a dozen or more defendants at one time), cert. den’d, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975).
examined
Cited "see"
University of Texas Medical School at Houston v. Than
(8×)
See Boykins v. Fairfield Bd. of Educ., 492 F.2d 697, 701 (5th Cir.1974) ("The requirements of due process are sufficiently flexible to accommodate themselves to various persons, interests, and tribunals without reduction to a stereotype and hence to absurdity."), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1350 , 43 L.Ed.2d 438 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mario Biaggi, Stanley Simon, Richard Biaggi, Peter Neglia, John Mariotta, and Bernard Ehrlich
See United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1343 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975); United States v. Rizzo, 491 F.2d 1235, 1236 (2d Cir.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Justo Enrique Jay
See United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1344-45 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Hodel
In making this determination the court is to consider a number of factors including “to what extent a judgment rendered in the person’s absence might be prejudicial to him.” Id.; see Tewa Tesuque v. Morton, 498 F.2d 240, 242-43 (10th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1353 , 43 L.Ed.2d 440 (1975); Lomayaktewa, 520 F.2d at 1325 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of America Union Oil Company of California as Representatives of a Certain Class of Lessees Under Oil and Gas Leases on the Jicarilla Apache Reservation Amoco Production Company Apexco, Inc. Aztec Oil and Gas Company Benson-Montin-Greer Drilling Corp. Dugan Production Corporation Engineering & Production Service Gulf Oil Corporation Nassau Resources, Inc. J.M. Huber Corporation Kirby Exploration Company Merrion and Bayless Drilling Mesa Petroleum Company North American Exploration Company Southland Royalty Sun Oil Company Tesoro Petroleum Corporation, Aquitaine Oil Corporation Filon Exploration Corporation Thomas N. Jordan and Trend Exploration, Limited, Additional Party-Defendants, Dome Petroleum Corporation, Applicant in Intervention-Appellant. Dome Petroleum Corporation v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of Interior of the United States Leonard Atole Richard Tecube Barbara Gonzales Elote Harrison Cora Gomez Freda Havens Edwin Sandova Rudy Velarde Calvin Veneno and Jonathan Wells, All Members of the Jicarilla Apache Tribe of New Mexico
In making this determination the court is to consider a number of factors including "to what extent a judgment rendered in the person's absence might be prejudicial to him." Id.; see Tewa Tesuque v. Morton, 498 F.2d 240, 242-43 (10th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1353 , 43 L.Ed.2d 440 (1975); Lomayaktewa, 520 F.2d at 1325
cited
Cited "see"
Ramon Sanchez v. Edwin Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United States
See Anglin v. Johnston, 504 F.2d 1165, 1167 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1353 , 43 L.Ed.2d 440 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Coburn by and Through Coburn v. Agustin
See Bell v. Hongisto, 501 F.2d 346 , 355 n. 12 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nash v. Auburn University
(2×)
See Boykins v. Fairfield Board of Education, 492 F.2d 697, 701 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1350 , 43 L.Ed.2d 438 (1975); Morale v. Grigel, 422 F.Supp. 988, 1004 (D.N.H.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rita M. Lavelle
See United States v. Bailey, 505 F.2d 417, 448 (D.C.Cir.1974) (affirming trial court’s handling of the evidence given the ultimate correctness of the ruling), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 961 , 95 S.Ct. 1350 , 43 L.Ed.2d 438 (1975). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Avoyelles Sportsmen's League, Inc. v. Marsh
See United States v. Rohm & Haas Co., 500 F.2d 167, 175 (5th Cir.1974), cert, denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1352 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975) (primary jurisdiction not necessary where agency had participated extensively in litigation).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Avoyelles Sportsmen's League, Inc., Cross-Appellants v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army, Etc., Elder Realty Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee. The Avoyelles Sportsmen's League, Inc. v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army, Etc., Elder Realty Company, Inc., George Bartmess, Intervenors-Appellants, Louisiana Department of Agriculture, Movant-Appellant
See United States v. Rohm & Haas Co., 500 F.2d 167, 175 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1352 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975) (primary jurisdiction not necessary where agency had participated extensively in litigation).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sam Cagnina, A/K/A \Sam\"
See United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1342 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975) (some defendants deeply involved in narcotics conspiracy and aware of its scope while others were not).
cited
Cited "see"
27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1169, 27 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,321 Roderick Plummer, Raymond W. Armorer, Neville F. Caesar, Gwendolyn Moore, and All Others Similarly Situated v. Chemical Bank, Miguel A. Oppenheimer, Louis Straker, Herman L. Clark, James Morrison, Theodore Ferguson and Herman I. Taitt, Objectors-Appellees
See United States v. Rohm & Haas Co., 500 F.2d 167, 177 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1352 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975); Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).
cited
Cited "see"
Plummer v. Chemical Bank
See United States v. Rohm & Haas Co., 500 F.2d 167, 177 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1352 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975); Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Reader's Digest Association, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Beatrice Foods Co., 493 F.2d 1259, 1264 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 961 , 95 S.Ct. 1350 , 43 L.Ed.2d 438 (1975). .
cited
Cited "see"
Kenai Oil & Gas, Inc. v. Department of the Interior
See Tewa Tesuque v. Morton, 498 F.2d 240, 242 (10th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1353 , 43 L.Ed.2d 440 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. School District of the City of Ferndale, Michigan
(2×)
See Boykins v. Fairfield Bd. of Ed., 457 F.2d 1091, 1096-97 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. den., 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1350 , 43 L.Ed.2d 438 (1975). 23 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sada Vargas, A/K/A Zaida Hernandez
(2×)
See United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323 , 1343 n.29 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Zbaraz v. Quern
See Bell v. Hongisto, 501 F.2d 346 (9th Cir. 1974), cert, denied 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fred Eubanks, Eugene Martinez, Leroy Jones, Henry D. Yanez
(2×)
See United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1340-1341 (2nd Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975). 1 Our district judges have the first and most critical responsibility, for they are positioned to sever trials when they can readily see, quicker than we, injustices that may occur if such is not done.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernesto Tercero, United States of America v. Juan Antonio Tercero
See United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1340-41 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Price
(2×)
See Boykins v. Fairfield Bd. of Ed., 457 F.2d 1091, 1096-97 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. den., 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1350 , 43 L.Ed.2d 438 (1975). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Francisco Adriano Armedo-Sarmiento, AKA Eduardo Sanchez, AKA Pacho El Mono, AKA Elkin, AKA Francisco Velez
See United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1340 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Council of Community Mental Health Centers, Inc. v. The Honorable F. David Mathews, Individually and as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare Appeal of Jerome S. Wagshal. National Council of Community Mental Health Centers, Inc. v. The Honorable F. David Mathews, Individually and as Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
See Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Morton, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 90 , 499 F.2d 1095, 1096 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975). 15 The district court sought to circumvent this statutory prohibition by relying on its historic equity jurisdiction to award attorney's fees as costs "as between solicitor and client." 11 The exception it applied is commonly referred to as the "common benefit" or "common fund" exception.
cited
Cited "see"
National Council of Community Mental Health Centers, Inc. v. Mathews
See Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Morton, 163 U.S.App.D.C. 90 , 499 F.2d 1095, 1096 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles R. Johnson
See United States v. Beatrice Foods Company, 344 F.Supp. 104 (Supp.Op. 351 F.Supp. 969 ) (D.Minn.1972), aff’d, 493 F.2d 1259 (8th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 961 , 95 S.Ct. 1350 ; United States v. Ancorp National Services, Inc., 516 F.2d 198 (2d Cir. 1975), affirming 367 F.Supp. 1221 (S.D.N.Y. 1974); Guziak v. F. T.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Magnano, A/K/A \Joe the Grind\""
See, United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1342 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975); United States v. Reina, 242 F.2d 302, 306 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 354 U.S. 913 , 77 S.Ct. 1294 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1427 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene C. Kirk, Sr.
See United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975); United States v. Sisca, 503 F.2d 1337 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 328 , 42 L.Ed.2d 283 (1974); United States v. Manfredi, 488 F.2d 588 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 2651 , 41 L.Ed.2d 240 (1974); United States v. Collier, 493 F.2d 327 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 831 , 95 S.Ct. 56 , 42 L.Ed.2d 57 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,484 United States of America v. Eric Blitz
(2×)
See United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323 , 1340-42 & n. 27 (2 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry Bernstein
(2×)
See United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1344-45 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph Seiller v. United States
See United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1343 (2 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Alan E. Harwood, Also Known as Expresso, and Frederick W. McKee
See United States v. Cantone, 426 F.2d 902, 904-05 (2d Cir.) (where evidence was insufficient to establish existence of a conspiracy, “the giving of the Pinkerton charge undoubtedly influenced the jury’s finding” with respect to conspiracy charge), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 827 , 91 S.Ct. 55 , 27 L.Ed.2d 57 (1970); see also United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1341 (2d Cir.1974) (noting that the Pinkerton charge “should not be given as a matter of course”), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Leisner
Indeed, it has been noted that "[t]his danger of sacrificing individual justice arises most often * * * wherein questions are raised as to. whether there was one single conspiracy or several minor conspiracies” (United States v Eubanks, 591 F2d 513, 522 [Ely, J., concurring] [9th Cir]; see also, United States v Sperling, 506 F2d 1323, 1340-1341, cert denied 420 US 962 [cautioning that use of single conspiracy indictments may lead to unnecessary exposure to reversal]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Investigation. Appeal of David Oreski
(2×)
See, e.g., Anglin v. Johnston, 504 F.2d 1165, 1169 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1353 , 43 L.Ed.2d 440 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Daniel C. Diaz v. Central Plains Regional Hospital
See, e.g., United States v. Rohm & Haas Co., 500 F.2d 167, 177 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1352 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Irwin Schiff v. Simon & Schuster, Incorporated
To make the sanction effective and thereby protect the processes of a court from abuse, a litigant against whom Rule 38 sanctions have been imposed must comply with those sanctions before being permitted to pursue new matters in that court. 2 Cf. Hacopian v. United States Department of Labor, 709 F.2d 1295, 1296 (9th Cir.1983) (“Courts have consistently found the power to dismiss an action for nonpayment of costs in a prior action to be part of the inherent power of the courts.”); World Athletic Sports Corp. v. Pahlavi, 267 F.Supp. 160, 163 (S.D.N.Y.1966) (“The staying of suits pending t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oreste Abbamonte, Joseph Delvecchio, and Guy Anthony Digirolamo, Defendants
See, e.g., United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1340-41 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975); United States v. Bynum, 485 F.2d 490, 495-97 (2d Cir.1973), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 417 U.S. 903 , 94 S.Ct. 2598 , 41 L.Ed.2d 209 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc.
No. 580, 86 Cong., 1st Sess., reprinted in 1959 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News 1804, 1807 (discussing amended section 5(1) as model for similar amendment to section 11 of Clayton Act); see also United States v. Beatrice Foods Co., 351 F.Supp. 969, 971 (D.Minn.1972), aff 'd, 493 F.2d 1259 (8th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 961 , 95 S.Ct. 1350 , 43 L.Ed.2d 438 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gaeta
Compare United States v. Decker, 543 F.2d 1102, 1103-04 (5th Cir.1976), with United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323 , 1341 n.27 (2nd Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Suquet
See, e.g., United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323, 1343 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 , 43 L.Ed.2d 439 ; 421 U.S. 949 , 95 S.Ct. 1682 , 44 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975); United States v. Manfredi, 488 F.2d 588, 603 (2d Cir.1973), cert, denied, 417 U.S. 936 , 94 S.Ct. 2651 , 41 L.Ed.2d 240 (1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Howell v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Sperling, 506 F.2d 1323 , 1337 n.19 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 962 , 95 S.Ct. 1351 (1975); United States v. Arlen, 252 F.2d 491, 496 (2d Cir. 1958).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Boykins
v.
Fairfield Board of Education
v.
Fairfield Board of Education
No. 73-2015.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1975.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.