green
Positive treatment
6.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
PDK Labs Inc. v. Reno
See 13th Regional Corp., 654 F.2d at 760 (“[E]xercise of the power of mandamus is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.” Quoting Cartier v. Secretary of State, 506 F.2d 191, 199 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 101 (1975)).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Jackson Leeds
See Cartier v. Secretary of State, 506 F.2d 191, 199 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Cornell Jones
See Cartier v. Secretary of State, 506 F.2d 191, 199 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Naa Dei Nikoi v. Attorney General of the United States
See Cartier v. Secretary of State, 506 F.2d 191, 197 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 101 (1975); cf. 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (a) (authority of Attorney General to adjust status of alien in the United States to permanent residence).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ervin J. Horton v. U.S. Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Commissioner Fred Goldberg
See Cartier v. Secretary of State, 506 F.2d 191, 199 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 (1975). 3 The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing.
discussed
Cited "see"
American Cetacean Society v. Baldrige
See aslo Cartier v. Secretary of State, 506 F.2d 191, 199 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 101 (1975). . 22 U.S.C. § 1978 (d) provides: After making a certification to the President under subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary of Commerce or the Secretary of the Interior, as the case may be, shall periodically review the activities of the nationals of the offending country to determine if the reasons for which the certification was made no longer prevail.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Gresko, United States of America v. Emilio R. \Hambone\" Julian
See United States v. Thomas, 508 F.2d 1200 , 1202 n. 2 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 100 (1975). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
William J. Davis, Inc. v. Young
However, the modern trend is to hold the doctrine applicable when “[the] agency is acting in a judicial capacity and resolves disputed issues of fact properly before it which the parties have had an adequate opportunity to litigate.” United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co., 384 U.S. 394, 421-22 , 86 S.Ct. 1545, 1560 , 16 L.Ed.2d 642 (1966); See Cartier v. Secretary of State, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 130 , 135 & n. 3, 506 F.2d 191 , 196 & n. 3 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 101 (1975); District of Columbia v. Ray, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 531 (1973); K.
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1977
See United States v. Thomas, 508 F.2d 1200, 1205 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 100 (1975); United States v. Schaefer, 510 F.2d 1307, 1311 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 978 , 95 S.Ct. 1975 , 44 L.Ed.2d 466 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bennett
See United States v. Thomas, 508 F.2d 1200, 1205 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 100 (1975); United States v. Schaefer, 510 F.2d 1307, 1311 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 978 , 95 S.Ct. 1975 , 44 L.Ed.2d 466 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
cadc 1977
See Cartier v. Secretary of State, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 130 , 135 n. 3, 506 F.2d 191 , 196 n. 3, cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 101 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Nazario Castaneda-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Cartier v. Secretary of State, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 130, 136 , 506 F.2d 191 , 197 n.4 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 101 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. Texaco, Inc.
See Cartier v. Secretary of State, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 130 , 135 n. 3, 506 F.2d 191 , 196 n. 3, cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 101 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Zagarino v. West
Thus, violations of such technical provisions of the wiretap law as the requirement that the government, in seeking a wiretap order, identify the law enforcement officer who made and authorized the application for permission to wiretap, 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (1)(a); see United States v. Bohn, 508 F.2d 1145, 1147 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1676 , 44 L.Ed.2d 100 (1975), would not ordinarily be “an error of the character or magnitude cognizable under a writ of habeas corpus.” Hill v. United States, 368 U.S. 424, 428 , 82 S.Ct. 468, 471 , 7 L.Ed.2d 417 (1962).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Welch
See also School Comm. of Springfield v. Board of Educ., 366 Mass. 315 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 (1975). 1.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mitchell v. Superior Court
(2×)
(Cf., Muniz v. Hoffman, supra, 422 U.S. 454 ; Girard v. Goins (8th Cir.1978) 575 F.2d 160 [applying a flexible, ad hoc standard to determine the level of fine that makes an offense "serious," and deciding on a case-by-case basis whether a particular fine would be serious to a particular defendant]; and United States v. Professional Air Traffic Controllers (1st Cir.1982) 678 F.2d 1 [applying the same test]; compare United States v. McAlister (10th Cir.1980) 630 F.2d 772 , 774 and United States v. Hamdan (9th Cir.1977) 552 F.2d 276, 280 [statutes authorizing $1,000 fine requires jury trial, "ad …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
cadc 1985
See also Cartier v. Secretary of State, 506 F.2d 191, 199 (D.C.Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 101 (1975) 11 22 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stephen Thomas Haar v. Michael Hanrahan
Compare Maita v. Whitmore, 508 F.2d 143, 146 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1676 , 44 L.Ed.2d 100 (1975) (rejecting Potvin ), with United States v. FMC Corp., 428 F.Supp. 615, 620 (W.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d on other grounds, 572 F.2d 902 (2d Cir.1978) (following Potvin).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers, Inc. v. Mayor of Boston
Compare School Comm. of Springfield v. Board of Educ., 366 Mass. 315, 338 (1974) (Quirico, J., concurring), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 947 (1975), with id. at 339-350 (Tauro, C.J., addendum).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nunzio
(2×)
See, e. g., Cartier v. Secretary of State, 165 U.S.App.D.C. 130 , 506 F.2d 191 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1677 , 44 L.Ed.2d 101 (1975); Thornton v. Corcoran, 132 U.S.App.D.C. 232 , 407 F.2d 695 (1969).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Shoolman v. Health Facilities Appeals Board
See, e.g., School Comm. of Springfield v. Board of Educ., 365 Mass. 215, 229-230 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hughes v. Cristofane
See also Maita v. Whitmore, 365 F.Supp. 1331 (N.D.Cal.1973), rev’d on other grounds, 508 F.2d 143 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 947 , 95 S.Ct. 1676 , 44 L.Ed.2d 100 (1975) (conduct not protected because obscene).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Poore v. State
See e.g., United States v. Bohn, 508 F. 2d 1145, 1148 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 421 U. S. 947 , 95 S. Ct. 1676 , 44 L.Ed.2d 100 (1975); United States v. Rizzo, 492 F. 2d 443, 447 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 417 U. S. 944 , 94 S. Ct. 3069 , 41 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974); United States v. Iannelli, 477 F. 2d 999, 1003 (3d Cir. 1973), aff'd on other grounds, 420 U. S. 770 , 95 S. Ct. 1284 , 43 L.Ed.2d 616 (1975); United States v. Wolk, 466 F. 2d 1143 (8th Cir. 1972).
Maita
v.
Whitmore, Sheriff
v.
Whitmore, Sheriff
No. 74-925.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Apr 28, 1975.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.