green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.3 score
“false exculpatory statement. . . could have been seen by the jury as a guilty man's desperate attempt to avoid arrest”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
St. Louis Union Trust Company v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
But see Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-381 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975). 50 Whether we analyze the causation issue before us in terms of materiality, reliance or both, the result is the same: causation in fact does not exist as a matter of law under § 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.
cited
Cited "but see"
St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
But see Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-381 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Lowenschuss v. Kane
These allegations of violation of our federal securities laws are indeed extremely general and obviously vulnerable to attack for lack of the particularity required by Rule 9(b), F.R.Civ.P., especially in the absence of any allegations of scienter or fraudulent intent, see Felton v. Walston and Co., Inc., 508 F.2d 577 (2d Cir. 1974); Segal v. Gordon, 467 F.2d 602 (2d Cir. 1972); Shemtob v. Shearson, Hammill & Co., 448 F.2d 442 (2d Cir. 1971); but cf. Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 378-79 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Murphy
false exculpatory statement. . . could have been seen by the jury as a guilty man's desperate attempt to avoid arrest
discussed
Cited "see"
Bond v. Clover Health Investments, Corp.
See Chelsea Assocs. v. Rapanos, 527 F.2d 1266, 1271 (6th Cir. 1975) (“In the usual fraud case or case brought for misrepresentation in violation of Rule 10b-5, proof of reliance upon the misstated or false fact is required.”) (citing Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2nd Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 (1975)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenwald v. ORB COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING, INC.
(2×)
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gap, Inc. v. Stone International Trading, Inc.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir. 1974) (requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) may be "relaxed as to matters peculiarly within the opposing party’s knowledge”), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); see also Denny v. Barber, 576 F.2d 465, 468 (2d Cir. 1978); Merrit v. Libby, McNeill & Libby, 510 F.Supp. 366, 373 (S.D.N.Y.1981). .
cited
Cited "see"
Lawrence v. Cohn
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Schultz
See Boyd, 566 F.2d at 933-34 (citing United States v. Schaefer, 510 F.2d 1307, 1312 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 975 , 95 S.Ct. 1975 , 44 L.Ed.2d 466 (1975)).
cited
Cited "see"
Kidder Peabody & Co. v. Unigestion International, Ltd.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kahn v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
See, id. (“To establish causation, the plaintiff must show ‘both loss causation — that the misrepresentations or omissions caused the economic harm — and transaction causation — that the violations in question caused the [plaintiff] to engage in the transaction in question.’ ”) (quoting Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), ce rt. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Dingler v. T.J. Raney & Sons, Inc.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hartman v. Blinder
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930 , 943 n. 23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Becker v. Silverman
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 381 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,764 Charles Kademian and Stan Janes v. Ladish Co., a Wisconsin Corporation, Stan Janes v. Ladish Co., a Wisconsin Corporation, William Dixon, Jane Schennum and Robert Eisele v. Ladish Co., a Wisconsin Corporation
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Kademian v. Ladish Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Hatrock v. Edward Jones & Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Hatrock v. Edward D. Jones & Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. F.A.G. Bearings Corp.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp. 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gulf Oil Corp. v. Dyke
(2×)
See, Condor Operating Co. v. Sawhill, 514 F.2d 351 (Em.App.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1975 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Cities Service Co. v. F.E.A., 529 F.2d 1016 (Em.App.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 947 , 96 S.Ct. 3166 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1184 (1976), the authorities therein, and their progeny.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re McDonnell Douglas Corp. Securities Litigation
Robins Co., 607 F.2d 545 , 553 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 2175 , 64 L.Ed.2d 802 (1980) (citing Blackie's "fraud-on-the-market" theory as applicable in actions brought under § 10b but not under § 18 of the SEA of 1934); Blackie, supra ; accord Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 381 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); cf. Fausett v. American Resources Management Corp., 542 F.Supp. 1234 (D.Utah 1982) (applying exception to actual reliance requirement in case involving short sales while simultaneously reject…
cited
Cited "see"
Sanders v. Thrall Car Manufacturing Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation, 507 F.2d 374, 382 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hassett v. Zimmerman (In Re O.P.M. Leasing Services, Inc.)
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir.1974), ce rt. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); McFarland v. Memorex Corp., 493 F.Supp. 631, 639 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Stromfield v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., 484 F.Supp. 1264, 1270 (S.D.N.Y.1980); Ross v. Warner, 480 F.Supp. 268, 271 (S.D.N.Y.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trans World Corp. v. Odyssey Partners
In that case, which also involved a precatory resolution, Judge Pollack held that because management would have been free to ignore the resolution regardless of whether it passed, the challenged proxy solicitation was not “an essential link in the accomplishment of some corporate action,” and the plaintiff therefore had not alleged the “transaction causation” essential to a 14(a) claim. 431 F.Supp. at 387 ; see Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brayton v. Ostrau
(2×)
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation, 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Ramada Inns Securities Litigation
See, for example, Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir.I974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975), where defendants engaged in a comprehensive scheme to defraud which included substantial collateral conduct in addition to misrepresentations and omissions in a proxy solicitation. 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
Schneider v. Austin
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation, 507 F.2d 374, 378-9 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Mitchell Newman
(2×)
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-81 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilson v. Comtech Telecommunications Corp.
See generally Gerstle v. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc., 478 F.2d 1281, 1301-03 (2d Cir. 1973) 7 In Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975), this court spoke of the need for "a showing of both loss causation that the misrepresentations or omissions caused the economic harm and transaction causation that the violations in question caused the appellant to engage in the transaction in question." In the instant case, as in Schlick, demonstration of the latter is the critical issue, as once this is done, the forme…
discussed
Cited "see"
Laketon Asphalt & Refining, Inc. v. United States Department of the Interior
(2×)
See Condor Operating Co. v. Sawhill, 514 F.2d 351 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1975), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1975 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 .
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Commonwealth Oil/Tesoro Petroleum Corp. Securities Litigation
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Smillie v. Park Chemical Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corporation, 507 F.2d 374, 381-83 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weitzman v. Stein
Estate Counseling Service, Inc. v. Merrill, Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 303 F.2d 527, 533 (10th Or. 1962); see Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-81 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Stone v. Stone
See In re Marriage of Milhan, 13 Cal.3d 129 , 117 Cal.Rptr. 809 , 528 P.2d 1145 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975) (National Service Life Insurance Act); Thiede, The Community Property Interest of the Non-Employee Spouse in Private Employee Retirement Benefits, 9 U.S.F.
cited
Cited "see"
Weinberger v. Kendrick
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Segal v. Gordon, 467 F.2d 602, 608 (2d Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maldonado v. Flynn
Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co., 396 U.S. 375, 385 , 90 S.Ct. 616, 622 , 24 L.Ed.2d 593 (1970); see Schlick v. Penn.-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 381-82, 383 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Goldberger v. Baker, 442 F.Supp. 659 (S.D.N.Y.1977); United States v. Fields, [Current] Fed.Sec.L.Rep.
cited
Cited "see"
Kaye v. Pantone, Inc.
See generally, Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380-81 (2d Cir. 1974), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James M. Boyd
See United States v. Schaefer, 510 F.2d 1307 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 421 U.S. 975 , 978, 95 S.Ct. 1975 , 44 L.Ed.2d 466 (1975); See also United States v. Box, 530 F.2d 1258 (5th Cir. 1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,263 Frank S. Yamamoto, Individually And, Derivatively, on Behalf of Investors Finance, Inc. v. Kazuo Omiya
(2×)
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 381-84 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Swanson v. American Consumers Industries, Inc., 475 F.2d 516, 520-21 (7th Cir. 1973).
cited
Cited "see"
Schlansky v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Weinberger v. Kendrick, 432 F.Supp. at 320 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. Hamilton International Corp.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2 Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Schoenbaum v. Firstbrook, 405 F.2d 215, 218 (2d Cir. 1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 395 U.S. 906 , 89 S.Ct. 1747 , 23 L.Ed.2d 219 (1969).
cited
Cited "see"
Sisters of the Precious Blood, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gross v. Diversified Mortgage Investors
“While the rule is relaxed as to matters peculiarly within the adverse parties' knowledge, the allegations must then be accompanied by a statement of facts upon which the belief is founded.” Id.; accord, Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975); Rich v. Touche Ross & Co., supra at 245.
cited
Cited "see"
Weinberger v. Kendrick
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 379 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Billet v. Storage Technology Corp.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 382-84 (2d Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James M. McCoy
See United States v. Schaefer, 8 Cir. 1975, 510 F.2d 1307, 1311-13 , cert. denied, 421 U.S. 975 , 978, 95 S.Ct. 1975 , 1980, 44 L.Ed.2d 466 , 470.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felipe Cervantes
(2×)
A motion for a new trial upon the basis of newly discovered evidence must meet the following requirements: “(1) It must appear from the motion that the evidence relied on is, in fact, newly discovered, i. e., discovered after the trial; (2) the motion must allege facts from which the court may infer diligence on the part of the movant; (3) the evidence relied on must not be merely cumulative or impeaching; (4) must be material to the issues involved; and (5) must be such as, on a new trial, would probably produce an acquittal.” Pitts v. United States, 263 F.2d 808, 810 (9th Cir.), cert. de…
cited
Cited "see"
Rich v. Touche Ross & Co.
See Schlick v. Penn-Dixie Cement Corp., 507 F.2d 374, 380 (2d Cir. *99 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 976 , 95 S.Ct. 1976 , 44 L.Ed.2d 467 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vento
See United States v. Schaefer, 510 F.2d 1307 , 1310 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 975 , 978, 95 S.Ct. 1975 , 1978, 44 L.Ed.2d 466 , 468 (1975); United States v. Brick, 502 F.2d 219, 224 (8th Cir. 1974); United States v. O'Neill, 497 F.2d 1020, 1025 (6th Cir. 1974); United States v. Bobo, 477 F.2d 974, 982-83 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 909 , 95 S.Ct. 1557 , 43 L.Ed.2d 774 (1975) 20 See Curreri, 388 F.Supp. at 620 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vento
See United States v. Schaefer, 510 F.2d 1307 , 1310 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 975 , 978, 95 S.Ct. 1975 , 1978, 44 L.Ed.2d 466 , 468 (1975); United States v. Brick, 502 F.2d 219, 224 (8th Cir. 1974); United States v. O’Neill, 497 F.2d 1020, 1025 (6th Cir. 1974); United States v. Bobo, 477 F.2d 974, 982-83 (4th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 909 , 95 S.Ct. 1557 , 43 L.Ed.2d 774 (1975). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Price
v.
Cotton, Trustee
v.
Cotton, Trustee
No. 74-1112.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
May 19, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Appeals Court (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.