Allen Homes, Inc. v. Weersing, 421 U.S. 998 (1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Allen Homes, Inc. v. Weersing, 421 U.S. 998 (1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1979 · …an unambiguous statute must be given effect according to its plain and obvious meaning. ⚠ not in text
118 citation events across 21 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama Power Company, American Petroleum Institute, Sierra Club, Bf Goodrich Company, American Paper Institute, Hoosier Energy Division, Mountain Fuel Supply Company, Montana Power Co., Natural Resources Council of Maine, Pittston Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Montana Power Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Council of Maine, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Bf Goodrich Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Hampton Roads Energy Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Sierra Club, and Friends of the Earth v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Montana Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pittston Company, Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Ideal Basic Industries, Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, the Pittston Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, American Paper Institute and the National Forest Products Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Manufacturing Chemists Association, Chemical Products Corporation, Dow Chemical Company, Fmc Corporation, Monsanto Company, Ppg Industries, Inc., Rohm and Haas Company, Stauffer Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation, Allied Chemical Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama By-Products Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Koppers Company, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of Epa, Usm Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Epa (cadc, 1979-07-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama Power Company, American Petroleum Institute, Sierra Club, Bf Goodrich Company, American Paper Institute, Hoosier Energy Division, Mountain Fuel Supply Company, Montana Power Co., Natural Resources Council of Maine, Pittston Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Montana Power Co., Intervenors. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Natural Resources Council of Maine, Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Bf Goodrich Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Hampton Roads Energy Company v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Northern Cheyenne Tribe, Sierra Club, and Friends of the Earth v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Montana Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Northern Cheyenne Tribe v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Pittston Company, Colorado Interstate Gas Co., Ideal Basic Industries, Inc., Intervenors. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, the Pittston Company v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, American Paper Institute and the National Forest Products Association v. United States Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Manufacturing Chemists Association, Chemical Products Corporation, Dow Chemical Company, Fmc Corporation, Monsanto Company, Ppg Industries, Inc., Rohm and Haas Company, Stauffer Chemical Company, Union Carbide Corporation, Allied Chemical Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama By-Products Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Koppers Company, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator of Epa, Usm Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency and Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Epa
D.C. Cir. · 1979 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
an unambiguous statute must be given effect according to its plain and obvious meaning.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Citizens to Save Spencer County v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
D.C. Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
an unambiguous statute must be given effect according to its plain and obvious meaning.
discussed Cited "see" Gerald W. Traunig v. Department of Veterans Affairs
Fed. Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brundage v. United States, 504 F.2d 1382, 1384-86 (Ct.Cl.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 (1975), reversed in part on other grounds by Cornetta v. United States, 851 F.2d 1372, 1378 (Fed.Cir.1988) (en banc); see also Hoover v. Department of the Navy, 957 F.2d 861, 863 (Fed.Cir.1992).
discussed Cited "see" State Ex Rel. Andersen v. Reward Corp. (2×)
Minn. Ct. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Allen Homes, Inc. v. Weersing, 510 F.2d 360, 362 (8th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975); Aveda Corp. v. Evita Marketing, Inc., 706 F.Supp. 1419, 1427 (D.Minn.1989).
cited Cited "see" Sargisson v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 502, 505 , 504 F.2d 1382, 1384 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" Alberico v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 502 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1974) (3 years, 8 months); Bunge, 5 Cl.Ct. 511 (3 years); Fleming v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 111 (1983) (11 months).
discussed Cited "see" Benton v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 502, 510 , 504 F.2d 1382, 1386 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975); Grisham v. United States, 183 Ct.Cl. 657, 663 , 392 F.2d 980, 983 , cert. denied, 393 U.S. 843 , 89 S.Ct. 125 , 21 L.Ed.2d 114 (1968).
cited Cited "see" Jones v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 502 , 504 F.2d 1382 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" American University Park Citizens Ass'n v. Burka
D.C. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
Powell v. Zuc-kert, 125 U.S.App.D.C. 55, 57 , 366 F.2d 634, 636 (1966); see Brundage v. United States, 504 F.2d 1382, 1384 (Ct.Cl.1974), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" Earnhardt
Ct. Cl. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 502, 509 , 504 F. 2d 1382, 1386 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 (1975); Grisham v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 657, 663 , 392 F. 2d 980, 983, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 843 (1968). “it is therefore ordered that plaintiff’s petition be and the same is hereby dismissed.” •
discussed Cited "see" Gunston
Ct. Cl. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 502 , 504 F. 2d 1382 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 (1975). “it is therefore ordered that defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted and plaintiff’s petition is hereby dismissed.”
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Birdwell v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 502 , 504 F.2d 1382 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975) (delay of three years and eight months from the date of discharge and the filing of suit was found to be excessive); Deering, supra (laches may be applied where the delay is less than six years); Alpert v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 810, 820-21 (1963), (citing 13 cases in which laches were applied where the delay was less than four and one-half years). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hamon v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1986 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Willcox v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 83, 84-85 (1983), aff'd, 769 F.2d 743 (Fed.Cir.1985); Zoesch v. United States, 650 F.2d 291 , 226 Ct.Cl. 557, 558 (1980) (claim accrues when all material facts upon which claim depends have occurred); see also Brundage v. United States, 504 F.2d 1382, 1385 , 205 Ct.Cl. 502, 508 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." David Leinoff v. Louis Milona & Sons, Inc. (2×)
Fed. Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Brundage v. United States, 504 F.2d 1382, 1384 , 205 Ct.Cl. 502 (1974), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 998 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Standard Oil Co. of California v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 502 , 504 F.2d 1382 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 (1975). [other citations omitted].
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sumner v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 502 , 504 F.2d 1382 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 (1975); Henry v. United States, 139 Ct. Cl. 362 , 153 F.Supp. 285 (1957) (citing Nicholas v. United States, 257 U.S. 71 (1921); Norris v. United States, 257 U.S. 77 (1921); and United States ex rel.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Holbrook v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 502, 507 , 504 F.2d 1382, 1385 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 (1975).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Casey
Ct. Cl. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 502 , 504 F.2d 1382 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 (1975) (lapse of 3 years and 8 months), citing other cases; Eurell v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 273, 280 , 566 F.2d 1146, 1150 (1977) (almost five years); McGahey v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 717 , 718 (1977) (4 years and 10 months); Earnhardt v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 741, 742 (1976) (5 years and one and one-half months); Smith v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 685 , 686-88 (1976) (31 months); Gunston v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 1018, 1020 (1975) (over four years); Bell v. United State…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Allen Homes, Inc.
v.
Weersing
No. 74-1218.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Jun 2, 1975.
421 U.S. 998
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 58%
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (2)

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.