green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.2 score
“the facts pleaded will not suffice to show the personal bias re 785 quired by the statute if they go to the background and associations of the judge rather than to his appraisal of a party personally.”
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. La Duca
(2×)
But see United States v. Allstate Mortgage Corp., 507 F.2d 492 (7th Cir. 1974), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2396 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Olis
the facts pleaded will not suffice to show the personal bias re 785 quired by the statute if they go to the background and associations of the judge rather than to his appraisal of a party personally.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Bushkin Associates, Inc. v. Raytheon Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
it is the fact that the acquisition was consummated that gives rise to liability on the finder's fee contract, so the two contracts are very closely connected
examined
Cited "see"
In Re Marriage of Skillen
(4×)
See Bertelson, 189 Mont. at 534-35 , 617 P.2d at 127 (citing Cobell v. Cobell (9th Cir.1974), 503 F.2d 790 , cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2396 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975)); Cobell, 503 F.2d at 795 (citing Barbour v. Barbour (1958), 134 Mont. 317 , 330 P.2d 1093 ).
cited
Cited "see"
Satcorp International Group v. China National Import & Export Corp.
See Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lca Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Shell Oil Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant
See Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263, 1272 (8th Cir.) (no abuse of discretion in disallowing untimely raising of new issues), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975); Nutt v. Black Hills Stage Lanes, Inc., 452 F.2d 480, 483 (8th Cir.1971) (newly discovered evidence should be discovered far enough in advance of trial to allow the opposing party sufficient time to prepare a defense).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pako Corp. v. Citytrust
See Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block Inc., 509 F.2d 1263 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975) (Missouri law); Ehrman v. Cook Electric Co., 468 F.Supp. 98 (N.D.Ill.1979); Edwin F. Armstrong & Co. v. Ben Pearson Inc., 294 F.Supp. 163 (E.D.Ark.1967), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Greer v. St. Tammany Parish Jail
(2×)
Dickerson v. State of Louisiana, 816 F.2d 220, 224 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 352 , 98 L.Ed.2d 378 (1987); see Fain v. Duff, 488 F.2d 218, 223 (5th Cir.1973) (citing Ex parte Royall, 117 U.S. 241 , 6 S.Ct. 734 , 29 L.Ed. 868 (1886)), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2396 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975). 16 .
cited
Cited "see"
LeRoy v. City of Houston
See discussion in Commonwealth of Pa. v. Local Union 542, Int'l Union of Engineers, 388 F.Supp. 155 (E.D.Pa.1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Louis Jones
(2×)
In the instant case defendant failed to object before the voir dire examination began and the district court was correct in concluding that he was barred from claiming noneompliance with the Act. 28 U.S.C. § 1867 (e); see United States v. Geelan, 509 F.2d 737, 740 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2396 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bradshaw v. United States
See Zychinski v. Commissioner, 506 F.2d 637 , 639 n.9 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 (1975); Staff of the Joint Comm, on Taxation, 96th Cong., 2d Sess., Staff Recommendations for Simplification of Tax Rules Relating to Subchapter S Corporations 11 (Joint Comm. Print 1980); Hewitt, Some Intriguing Recent Developments in Subchapter S, 44 Taxes 848 ,858-59 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc., a Corporation and Baukol-Noonan, Inc., a Corporation v. Manitowoc Company, Inc., a Corporation v. Sanderson and Porter
See Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263, 1272 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975). 27 IV.
cited
Cited "see"
Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Manitowoc Co.
See Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263, 1272 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arlie Glen Skelton, Jr. v. General Motors Corporation
(2×)
See Zychinski v. Commissioner, 506 F.2d 637, 639 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975); Luckman v. Commissioner, 418 F.2d 381, 387 (7th Cir. 1969).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Layton
See U.S. v. Geelan, 509 F.2d 737, 739-40 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
PIC Inc. v. Prescon Corp.
See Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975); P. A. B.
cited
Cited "see"
Akerson v. Gupta
See Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor Company
See Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Douglas Anthony Holt v. Harold Black, Warden
(2×)
See Fain v. Duff, 488 F.2d 218 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2396 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975) and Jones v. Breed, 497 F.2d 1160 (9th Cir. 1974), vacated, 421 U.S. 519 , 95 S.Ct. 1779 , 44 L.Ed.2d 346 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holt v. Black
(2×)
See Fain v. Duff, 488 F.2d 218 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2396 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975) and Jones v. Breed, 497 F.2d 1160 (9th Cir. 1974), vacated, 421 U.S. 519 , 95 S.Ct. 1779 , 44 L.Ed.2d 346 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of JWY
(2×)
Id., at 864; see United States v. Allstate Mortgage Corp., 507 F. 2d 492, 494-95 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2396 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re J. W. Y.
(2×)
Id., at 864; see United States v. Allstate Mortgage Corp., 507 F.2d 492, 494-95 (7th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2396 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Major Ellis Harris and Henry Harris
(2×)
See United States v. Geelan, 509 F.2d 737, 743-744 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2396 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Kenneth W. Doehring v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Zychinski v. Commissioner, 506 F.2d 637 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2397 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975); Marshall v. Commissioner, 510 F.2d 259 (10th Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MacDraw, Inc. v. CIT Group Equipment Financing, Inc.
See also Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local Union 542, IUE, 388 F.Supp. 155, 163 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 478 F.2d 1398 (3d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975) (Higginbotham, J.) (denying defendant’s motion to disqualify judge from hearing race discrimination claim, on basis of his race and comments he made in speech to “group' composed of black- historians,” and holding “that one is black does not mean, ipso facto, that he is anti-white; no more than being Jewish implies being anti-Catholic, or being Catholic implies being anti-Protestant”). 3.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Insurance Companies v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Company, Inc.
See, e.g., Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263, 1267-68 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Insurance Companies v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.
See, e.g., Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263, 1267-68 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Howard E. BUNCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee
Second, assuming Bunch had succeeded in demonstrating that the deposition testimony of Lingelbach and Turner was no longer true, Rule 26(e) only imposes a duty to amend a response when failure to disclose new facts “is in substance a knowing concealment.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(e)(2)(B); see also, Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263, 1272 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 665 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Bearden, Clarence Stowers, Jr., and Farrell Nixdorf, Defendants- United States of America v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Georgia, Inc. Georgia Waste Systems, Inc. Sca Services of Georgia, Inc. Complete Refuse Removal, Inc. James L. Baker Raymond E. Dinkle Charles W. Langello and Roy P. Fowler, Jr., Defendants- United States of America v. Northside Realty Associates, Inc. Barton & Ludwig, Inc. Harry Norman & Associates, Inc. Clover Realty Co. Edwin A. Isakson Chandler B. Barton and Harry Norman, Jr.
See also United States v. Geelan, 509 F.2d 737 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975) (motion filed 36 days after arraignment untimely, where basis for motion could have been discovered upon inquiry); United States v. Rickus, 351 F.Supp. 1386 (E.D.Pa.1972), affirmed, 480 F.2d 919 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1006 , 94 S.Ct. 365 , 38 L.Ed.2d 243 (1973) (motion filed after voir dire of jury untimely where defense counsel could have investigated the matter earlier); United States v. Arnett, 342 F.Supp. 1255 (D.Mass.1970) (motion filed 39 days aft…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bearden
See also United States v. Geelan, 509 F.2d 737 (8th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 999 , 95 S.Ct. 2395 , 44 L.Ed.2d 666 (1975) (motion filed 36 days after arraignment untimely, where basis for motion could have been discovered upon inquiry); United States v. Rickus, 351 F.Supp. 1386 (E.D.Pa.1972), affirmed, 480 F.2d 919 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1006 , 94 S.Ct. 365 , 38 L.Ed.2d 243 (1973) (motion filed after voir dire of jury untimely where defense counsel could have investigated the matter earlier); United States v. Arnett, 342 F.Supp. 1255 (D.Mass.1970) (motion filed 39 days aft…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davenport v. Commissioner
(2×)
See, e.g., Buhler Mortgage Co. v. Commissioner , 51 T.C. 971 , 977 (1969) , affd. per curiam 443 F.2d 1362 (9th Cir. 1971) , a Court-reviewed opinion in which we stated, "we cannot find that the nature of the income changes simply because the corporation earning it must engage in many activities and exert a great deal of effort in doing so." In Marshall v. Commissioner , 60 T.C. 242 , 252 (1973) , affd. 510 F.2d 259 (10th Cir. 1975) , also a Court-reviewed opinion, we held "interest and rental income are part of 'passive investment income' even though the recipient of such interest or rental i…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Duff
v.
Fain
v.
Fain
No. 73-1768.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.
Jun 2, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1) · S.D. Texas (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.