green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanchez
See United States v. Maggio, 514 F.2d 80, 91 (5th Cir.1975) ("The Biyan requirement that a defendant be placed under oath was to preclude collateral attacks on a guilty plea by a defendant asserting that his representations to the court when he entered the plea were fabricated.”), ce rt. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 563 , 46 L.Ed.2d 405 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sam Gray Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
See Jascourt v. United States, 521 F.2d 1406 (Ct.Cl.) (government not bound by the actions of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for Labor Relations or the Director of the Division of Public Employees), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 562 , 46 L.Ed.2d 405 (1975); Byrne Org., Inc. v. United States, 152 Ct.Cl. 578, 287 F.2d 582 (1961) (letters of intent issued by the Director and Chief Administrative Officer of the Capital Sesquicentennial Commission not binding); Gordon Woodroffe Corp. v. United States, 122 Ct.Cl. 723 , 104 F.Supp. 984 (1952) (Special Assistant to the State Departme…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James P. McNeill
See United States v. Turcotte, 515 F.2d 145, 151 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975). 1 Appellant relies on Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14 , 87 S.Ct. 1920 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967), to support his contention that he was denied due process and compulsory process by the exclusion of his witnesses’ testimony relating to Anthony’s solicitation of them.
cited
Cited "see"
Blankenship v. State
See United States v. Muckenstrum, 5th Cir., 515 F.2d 568 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hamza v. United States
Bevelheimer v. United Stales, 4 Cl.Ct. 558, 562 (1984) (citing Legerlotz v. Rogers, 266 F.2d 457 , 459 n. 5 (D.C.Cir.1959)); see also Jascourt v. United Stales, 207 Ct.Cl. 955 , 1975 WL 22989 cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 562 , 46 L.Ed.2d 405 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Billy Wayne Waldrop v. Ronald E. Jones
See, e.g., United States v. Muckenstrum, 515 F.2d 568, 570-71 (5th Cir.) (criticizing instruction that defined “reasonable doubt” as one that “must be substantial” and more than “a mere possible doubt”), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975); Bryant v. State, 348 So.2d 1136, 1138 (Ala.Crim.App.) (rejecting attack on instruction defining “reasonable doubt” as a “real and substantial doubt”), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waldrop v. Jones
See, e.g., United States v. Muckenstrum, 515 F.2d 568, 570-71 (5th Cir.) (criticizing instruction that defined "reasonable doubt" as one that "must be substantial" and more than "a mere possible doubt"), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S. Ct. 564 (1975); Bryant v. State, 348 So. 2d 1136, 1138 (Ala. Crim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Waldrop v. Jones
See, e.g., United States v. Muckenstrum, 515 F.2d 568, 570-71 (5th Cir.) (criticizing instruction that defined "reasonable doubt" as one that "must be substantial" and more than "a mere possible doubt"), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 746 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975); Bryant v. State, 348 So.2d 1136, 1138 (Ala.Crim.App.) (rejecting attack on instruction defining "reasonable doubt" as a "real and substantial doubt"), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kimes v. United States
(2×)
This motion was untimely, and the untimeliness was jurisdictional, United States v. Lara-Hernandez, 588 F.2d 272, 275 (9th Cir.1978); see also United States v. Braman, 327 A.2d 530, 534 (D.C.1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 562 , 46 L.Ed.2d 405 (1975). [7] Presumably for this reason, Judge Bacon has never ruled on it.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gratkowski v. United States
See also Jascourt v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 955 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 562 , 46 L.Ed.2d 405 (1975). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bevelheimer v. United States
See also Jascourt v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 955 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 562 , 46 L.Ed.2d 405 (1975); Penn-Ohio Steel Corp. v. United States, 173 Ct.Cl. 1064, 1085 , 354 F.2d 254, 267 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bacon
Compare United States v. Braman, D.C.App., 327 A.2d 530 (1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 562 , 46 L.Ed.2d 405 (1975), with Will v. United States, supra. In United States v. Moultrie, supra, this court found that mandamus would lie to direct a judge to vacate his order quashing a grand jury subpoena.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salley
See, e.g., United States v. Muckenstrum, 515 F.2d 568, 571 (C.A.5), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975); United States v. Christy, 444 F.2d 448, 450 (C.A.6), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 949 , 92 S.Ct. 293 , 30 L.Ed .2d 266 (1971).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tsoumas v. State of New Hampshire
Cupp v. Naughten, supra; see also United States v. Muckenstrum, 515 F.2d 568, 571 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 564 , 46 L.Ed.2d 406 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. Kentucky
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Muckenstrum, 515 F. 2d 568, 571 (CA5), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 1032 (1975); United States v. Christy, 444 F. 2d 448, 450 (CA6), cert. denied, 404 U. S. 949 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pritchett
See also United States v. Maggio, 514 F.2d 80 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1032 , 96 S.Ct. 563 , 46 L.Ed.2d 405 (1975); Masciola v. United States, 469 F.2d 1057 (3rd Cir. 1972); Weilnitz v. Page, 420 F.2d 935 (10th Cir. 1970); Vanater v. Boles, 377 F.2d 898 (4th Cir. 1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jorgensen
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 74-5865.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 15, 1975.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.