Nebraska Press Assn. Et Al. v. Stuart, Judge, 423 U.S. 1027 (1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Nebraska Press Assn. Et Al. v. Stuart, Judge, 423 U.S. 1027 (1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart (scotus, 1976-06-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart
SCOTUS · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See n. 1, supra. After construing Nebraska law to permit closure in certain circumstances, the court remanded the case to the District Judge for reconsideration of the issue whether pretrial hearings should be closed to the press and public. *546 We granted certiorari to address the important issues raised by the District Court order as modified by the Nebraska Supreme Court, but we denied the motion to expedite review or to stay entirely the order of the State District Court pending Simants' trial. 423 U. S. 1027 (1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nebraska Press Association
v.
Hugh Stuart, Judge, District Court of Lincoln County, Nebraska
75-817.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 18, 1975.
423 U.S. 1027
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

Sup. Ct. Neb. Motion of Nebraska Press Assn, et al. for leave to treat their application as a petition for certiorari having been heretofore granted [ante, p. 1011], it is ordered:

1. Petition for writ of certiorari granted;

2. Motion to expedite denied. Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant motion.

3. Application for stay denied. Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice Marshall would grant application. Mr. Justice White would stay judgment of the Nebraska Supreme Court to the extent that its order forbade the publication of information disclosed in public at the preliminary hearing in the criminal case out of which this case arose. In this respect, he is in disagreement with the Court’s actions in this case today. He joins the Court in granting the petition for writ of certiorari and in ordering plenary consideration of this case, which as he understands it, raises issues broader than the power of the State to enjoin the publication of facts disclosed at a public hearing in a state' court. Being convinced that these questions should be decided only after adequate briefing and argument and ample time for mature consideration, he is in agreement that we should not attempt to hear and decide this case prior to the beginning of the criminal trial in early January.

4. Petitioners Nebraska Press Assn, et al. are invited to file an amended petition for certiorari on or before December 30, 1975. Responses may be made in accord with the Court’s Rules.