Woods v. Henderson, 423 U.S. 873 (1975). · Go Syfert
Woods v. Henderson, 423 U.S. 873 (1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
148 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Higgs (nyappdiv, 2007-02-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Higgs
N.Y. App. Div. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
The defendant executed a detailed written waiver of the right to appeal from the judgment of conviction which included “any suppression issues that may exist . . . pre-trial motions or rulings by the Court” (People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; see People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829, 830 [1975], cert denied 423 US 873 [1975]; People v Holman, 33 AD3d 815 [2006]; People v Burke, 25 AD3d 722 [2006]).
discussed Cited "see" State v. DeWitt (2×)
Ariz. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Grijalva, 111 Ariz. 476, 478 , 533 P.2d 533, 535 (citing Haerr v. United States, 240 F.2d 533, 535 (5th Cir.1957) (a search can be defined as an examination of one’s premises or person “with a view to the discovery of contraband or evidence of guilt to be used in prosecution of a criminal action”)), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 873 , 96 S.Ct. 141 , 46 L.Ed.2d 104 (1975).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Stokley
Ariz. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
State v. Harding, 137 Ariz. 278, 291 , 670 P.2d 383, 396 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1017 , 79 L.Ed.2d 246 (1984); see State v. Wilcynski, 111 Ariz. 533, 535 , 534 P.2d 738, 740 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 873 , 96 S.Ct. 141 , 46 L.Ed.2d 104 (1975).
cited Cited "see" State v. Bauer
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally State v. Grijalva, 111 Ariz. 476 , 533 P.2d 533 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 873 , 96 S.Ct. 141 , 46 L.Ed.2d 104 (1975); State v. Book-Cellar, Inc., 139 Ariz. at 528 , 679 P.2d at 551 .
cited Cited "see" Foltz v. U.S. News & World Report, Inc.
D.D.C. · 1986 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord Powell v. Radkins, 506 F.2d 763 , 765 n. 5 (5th Cir.1975), reh. denied, 509 F.2d 576 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 873 , 96 S.Ct. 140 , 46 L.Ed.2d 104 (1975); Cato v. So.
cited Cited "see" People v. Santana
N.Y. App. Div. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
A waiver of that right is a proper element of a plea bargain (People v Andrus, 81 AD2d 676 ; see People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829 , cert den 423 US 873 ).
cited Cited "see" Love v. Hidalgo
D. Maryland · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Andrews v. Knowlton, 509 F.2d 898, 903 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 873 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975) (and cases cited therein).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Collier
N.Y. App. Div. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
In our view, defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see, People v Collier, 226 AD2d 923, lv denied 88 NY2d 935 ; People v Scott, 222 AD2d 958, lv denied 87 NY2d 1025 ; see also, People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829, 830 , cert denied 423 US 873).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Velasquez
N.Y. App. Div. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
The record of the plea allocution, including direct colloquy with the defendant about the reasons he wished to plead guilty, repeated references by the defendant’s attorney to waiver of the right to challenge on appeal a suppression ruling as part of the plea bargain, and a lengthy statement by the People as to why that condition was attached to the plea, demonstrates that the defendant’s waiver was voluntary, knowing, and intelligent (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1 ; see also, People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829 , cert denied 423 US 873 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Bratton
N.Y. App. Div. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
In People v Strafford ( 164 AD2d 898 ) the County Court, in accordance with its own policy, required the defendant to waive his right to appeal in exchange for the sentence commitment and this court upheld the waiver and dismissed the defendant’s appeal (see, People v Strafford, supra; see also, People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829 , cert denied 423 US 873 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Williams
N.Y. App. Div. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
By so withdrawing his pretrial motions, the defendant waived his right to appellate review of the Trial Judge’s suppression determination and is precluded from now raising suppression issues on appeal (see, People v Kafka, 128 AD2d 895 ; People v Feingold, 125 AD2d 587 ; People v Colarusso, 103 AD2d 848 ; see also, People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829 , cert denied 423 US 873 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Battista
N.Y. App. Div. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
Therefore, the defendant is precluded from now raising these issues (see, People v Kafka, 128 AD2d 895 ; People v Feingold, 125 AD2d 587 ; People v Colarusso, 103 AD2d 848 ; see also, People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829 , cert denied 423 US 873 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Woods
v.
Henderson, Warden
No. 75-5108.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1975.
423 U.S. 873
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.