green
Positive treatment
8.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States, Tax Division v. Case (In re Case)
See United States of America v. Farris, 517 F.2d 226, 228-9 (7th Cir. 1975) cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 189 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975) (holding that the United States Treasury Department’s certified computer records were admissible as self-authenticating documents); United States of America v. Ryan, 969 F.2d 238, 240 (7th Cir. 1992) (same); Brewer v. United States of America, 764 F.Supp. 309, 318 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Waldei v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
See Pelaez v. INS, 513 F.2d 303 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 190 , 46 *365 L.Ed.2d 124 (1975) (Congress has plenary power in immigration area, particularly in determining which aliens will be admitted.); Ahrens v. Rojas, 292 F.2d 406 (5th Cir.1961) (Exclusion of aliens is fundamental act of sovereignty and courts have no power not expressly granted by Congress in exclusion cases). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Mahoney v. National Organization for Women
(2×)
See Holodnak v. Avco Corp., 514 F.2d 285, 292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 188 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975); Wahba v. New York University, 492 F.2d 96, 103-04 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 874 , 95 S.Ct. 135 , 42 L.Ed.2d 113 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re L.H. & A. Realty, Inc.
See Ryan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 517 F.2d 13, 20 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 190 , 46 L.Ed.2d 124 (1975) (presuming Tax Court’s authority to enforce discovery order through contempt citation).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kemp
(2×)
See Canney v. State, 298 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973), cert. denied, 310 So.2d 743 (Fla.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 188 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jesse James Ford, III v. Thomas Israel
(2×)
See Ross v. Reda, 510 F.2d 1172, 1173 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 190 , 46 L.Ed.2d 124 (1975) (where Sixth Amendment right to counsel is involved, power to exclude out-of-state counsel is not absolute); Lefton v. City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, 333 F.2d 280, 285 (5th Cir.1964) (applying NAACP v. Button analysis to local counsel rule).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald L. Dobyns, Mark Lee and Randall Eugene Bullock v. E-Systems, Inc.
(2×)
See Holodnak v. Avco Corp., Avco-Lycoming Division, Stratford, 514 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 188 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975) in which the court found state action present in activities of a private company which contracted exclusively with the Department of Defense.
cited
Cited "see"
Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang
See Pelaez v. INS, 513 F. 2d 303 (CA5), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 892 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Local 413, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers
(2×)
See Holodnak v. Aveo Corp., 381 F.Supp. 191, 206 (D.Conn.1974), modified on other grounds, 514 F.2d 285 (CA 2), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 188 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975); Jordan v. Fusari, 422 F.Supp. 1179, 1182-83 (D.Conn.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Neff
Accord, United States v. Farris, 517 F.2d 226, 228 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 189 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975); United States v. Dota, 482 F.2d 1005, 1007 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1071 , 94 S.Ct. 583 , 38 L.Ed.2d 477 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis Lee Ullrich
(2×)
Accord, Canney v. State, 298 So.2d 495 (Fla. App.1973), cert. denied, 310 So.2d 743 (Fla.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 188 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975); Chaney v. State, 237 So.2d 281 (Fla.App.), cert. denied, 242 So.2d 461 (Fla.1970), cert. denied, 403 U.S. 904 , 91 S.Ct. 2205 , 29 L.Ed.2d 680 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mendenhall v. Hopper
See Ross v. Reda, 510 *984 F.2d 1172 (6th Cir.), cert. den. 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 190 , 46 L.Ed.2d 124 ; Gamez v. Beto, 406 F.2d 1000 (5th Cir.); Chromiak v. Field, 406 F.2d 502 (9th Cir.), cert. den. 396 U.S. 1017 , 90 S.Ct. 581 , 24 L.Ed.2d 508 ; Goodspeed v. Beto, 341 F.2d 908 (5 Cir.), cert. den. 386 U.S. 926 , 87 S.Ct. 867 , 17 L.Ed.2d 798 , rehearing den. 386 U.S. 969 , 87 S.Ct. 1032 , 18 L.Ed.2d 126 ; In re Johnson, 277 F.Supp. 267 (D.C., Tenn.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wallace v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
(2×)
See Holodnak v. Avco Corp., 381 F.Supp. 191 (D.Conn.1974), modified, 514 F.2d 285 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 188 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Morris Harris
United States v. Dota, 482 F.2d 1005 (CA10), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1071 , 94 S.Ct. 583 , 38 L.Ed.2d 477 (1973); accord, United States v. Farris, 517 F.2d 226 (CA7), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 189 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975). 2 The exception to the hearsay rule embodied in Rule 803(10) is justified because evidence admitted under it is in its nature highly reliable, i.e., the “yes or no” of whether a license has been issued; because the records from which the evidence comes are open to the public thereby increasing the probability that any errors will be found and corrected; and bec…
cited
Cited "see"
Ryan v. Commissioner
See Ryan v. Commissioner, 517 F.2d 13 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 892 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tarrant
See also, United States v. Farris, 517 F.2d 226 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 189 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Joel Myron v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
(4×)
See, e.g., Holodnak v. Avco Corp., 514 F.2d 285 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 188 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975); see also, Geneva Towers Tenants Organization v. Federated Mortgage Investors, 504 F.2d 483, 487 (9th Cir.1974). 16 To fairly attribute to the federal government Conrail's decision to discharge Myron, we must find either that "there is a sufficiently close nexus between the [government] and the challenged action of the regulated entity so that the action of the latter may be fairly treated as that of the [government] itself," Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co., 419 U.S. …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DiLuzio v. United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America
See, e.g., Draganescu v. First Nat’l Bank, supra. On a related point, in the Sixth Amendment context, courts in criminal cases have emphasized that while there is a fundamental right to effective assistance of counsel which “implies a degree of freedom to be represented by counsel of defendant’s choice, this guarantee does not grant the unconditional right to representation in a state court by a particular out-of-state attorney.” Ross v. Reda, 510 F.2d 1172, 1173 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Merles v. Lerner
See, e.g., Ross v. Reda, 510 F.2d 1172 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 (1975).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
John Briggs v. Guy Goodwin
(4×)
See, e.g., Holodnak v. Avco Corp., 514 F.2d 285, 292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 188 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975), and Wahba v. New York University, 492 F.2d 96, 103-04 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 874 , 95 S.Ct. 135 , 42 L.Ed.2d 113 (1974). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harrod
See, e. g., Ryan v. Commissioner, 517 F.2d 13,18-20 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 190 , 46 L.Ed.2d 124 (1975) (Fifth Amendment claim against self-incrimination); Gialde v. Time, Inc., 480 F.2d 1295 (8th Cir. 1973) (claim of confidentiality of news sources); United States v. Anderson, 150 U.S.App.D.C. 336 , 464 F.2d 1390 (1972) (Fifth Amendment claim against self-incrimination); Borden Co. v. Sylk, 410 F.2d 843 (3d Cir. 1969) (claims of pecuniary harm and irrelevance); United States v. Fried, supra (claim of potential harm to psychological and physical well-being if required…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Harrod
See, e. g, Ryan v. Commissioner, 517 F.2d 13, 18-20 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 190 , 46 L.Ed.2d 124 (1975) (Fifth Amendment claim against self-incrimination); Gialde v. Time, Inc., 480 F.2d 1295 (8th Cir. 1973) (claim of confidentiality of news sources); United States v. Anderson, 150 U.S.App.D.C. 336 , 464 F.2d 1390 (1972) (Fifth Amendment claim against self-incrimination); Borden Co. v. Sylk, 410 F.2d 843 (3d Cir. 1969) (claims of pecuniary harm and irrelevance); United States v. Fried, supra (claim of potential harm to psychological and physical well-being if required…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation v. International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers, Afl-Cio, Local Union 2294
(2×)
See also, Section 203(d) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, 61 Stat. 154 , 29 U.S.C. § 173 (d). 9 2 The Supreme Court has emphasized that " 'The underlying objective of the national labor laws is to promote collective bargaining agreements and to help give substance to such agreements through the arbitration process.' " Carey v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 375 U.S. 261, 265 , 84 S.Ct. 401, 405 , 11 L.Ed.2d 320 (1964), quoting Judge Fuld, below, in dissent, 11 N.Y.2d 452, 458 , 230 N.Y.S.2d 703, 706 , 184 N.E.2d 298, 300 (1962). 3 There is no suggestion here of fraud or bias on the …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ryan v. New York Newspaper Printing Pressmen's Union No. 2
(2×)
See also Holodnak v. Avco Corp., Avco-Lycoming Div., Stratford, Conn., 381 F.Supp. 191 (D.Conn.1974) (Lumbard, J., sitting by designation), aff’d in pertinent part, 514 F.2d 285 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 188 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Briggs v. Goodwin
(2×)
See, e. g., Holodnak v. Avco Corp., Avco-Lycoming Div., Stratford, Conn., 514 F.2d 285, 292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 188 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975), and Wahba v. New York University, 492 F.2d 96, 103-04 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 874 , 95 S.Ct. 135 , 42 L.Ed.2d 113 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Briggs v. Goodwin
(2×)
See, e. g., Holodnak v. Avco Corp., Avco-Lycoming Div., Stratford, Conn., 514 F.2d 285, 292 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 892 , 96 S.Ct. 188 , 46 L.Ed.2d 123 (1975), and Wahba v. New York University, 492 F.2d 96, 103-04 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 874 , 95 S.Ct. 135 , 42 L.Ed.2d 113 (1974).
Holodnak
v.
Avco Corp., Avco-Lycoming Division
v.
Avco Corp., Avco-Lycoming Division
No. 74-6561.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1975.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.