green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1989 ·
…the court should not have considered the retroactivity of united states v. maze ... he issue was not properly before the court as a defense to the petition for revocation of probation
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Claude Leander Riley
But cf. Maglaya v. Buchkoe, 515 F.2d 265, 270-72 (6th Cir.) (McCree, J., dissenting) (failure to request production of witness’ medical reports and to procure testimony of witness’ examining psychiatrist as relevant to claim of ineffective assistance of counsel), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1975). .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Hofierka
he underlying validity of a conviction cannot be asserted as a defense'in a probation revocation proceeding the conviction's validity may be collaterally attacked only in a separate proceeding under 28 u.s.c.a. 2255 ... ,
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
William Neal Moore v. Walter Zant
(2×)
the court should not have considered the retroactivity of united states v. maze ... he issue was not properly before the court as a defense to the petition for revocation of probation
discussed
Cited "see"
Sabine Consolidated, Inc. v. State
See Peterson v. Goodwin, 512 F.2d 479 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1975) (officer charged with conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline in the armed forces cannot actually have doubted that his sale of heroin to fellow airmen was an offense); McCall v. State, 540 S.W.2d 717, 719 (Tex.Cr.App.1976) (statute criminalizing conduct of intentionally or knowingly failing “unreasonably to provide necessary food, care, or shelter for an animal in [person’s] custody” is not vague or indefinite); Gano v. State, 466 S.W.2d 730, 732 (Tex.Cr.App.1971)…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth L. Thomas
See Torrez-Flores, 624 F.2d at 780 -81 (quoting United States v. Francischine, 512 F.2d 827, 829 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 284 , 46 L.Ed.2d 261 (1975)).
discussed
Cited "see"
John G. Ordway and Margaret M. Ordway v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Francischine, 512 F.2d 827, 830 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 284 , 46 L.Ed.2d 261 (1975)").
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Makres
See United States v. Flick, 516 F.2d 489, 495-96 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Trader
Accord, Maglaya v. Buchkoe, 515 F.2d 265 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jorge Juan Restrepo-Rua
(2×)
See United States v. Hobson, 519 F.2d 765, 776 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 283 , 46 L.Ed.2d 261 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert S. Palow, United States of America v. Paul C. Alvarado
See United States v. Flick, 516 F.2d 489, 494-95 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Gambill v. State
See Cox v. State (1981), Ind.App. 422 N.E.2d 357 citing United States v. Flick (7th Cir.1975), 516 F.2d 489 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ward Gulvin and Estate of Dorothy Gulvin, Deceased v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See Lutter v. Commissioner, 61 T.C. 685 (1974), aff’d per curiam, 514 F.2d 1095 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 283 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1975); Donner v. Commissioner, 25 T.C. 1043 (1956).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barry Byron Mills, Daniel James Cavanaugh, Robbin Lynn Bryan Cavanaugh, Martin Trevino Vargas, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Hobson, 519 F.2d 765, 772 (9th Cir.), Cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 283 , 46 L.Ed.2d 261 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. White
See Peterson v. Goodwin, 512 F.2d 479 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raymond Eaglin
See United States v. Hobson, 519 F.2d 765, 769-70 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 283 , 46 L.Ed.2d 261 (1975). 4 Similarly, “when knowledge of a fact is required to convict for a substantive offense, knowledge is also required to convict for conspiracy to coihmit the substantive offense.” United States v. Bekowies, 432 F.2d 8, 14 (9th Cir. 1970) (applying § 1071).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Spence
See Peterson v. Goodwin, 512 F.2d 479 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct.. 282, 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Peters
See United States v. Flick, 516 F.2d 489 (7th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moore
See Peterson v. Goodwin, 512 F.2d 479 (5th Circuit 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1976); see also Gosa v. Mayden, 413 U.S. 665 , 93 S.Ct. 2926 , 37 L.Ed.2d 873 (1973) and this Court’s decision in United States v. Rock, 49 C.M.R. 235 , 238 (1974), concerning the forum appropriateness implication of Gosa .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Cravero
Accord, Maglaya v. Buchkoe, 515 F.2d 265, 268 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1975); United States v. Ruggiero, 472 F.2d 599, 604 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 939 , 93 S.Ct. 2772 , 37 L.Ed.2d 398 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Peter A. Makres, Also Known as Jerome K. Callahan
See also United States v. Flick, 516 F.2d 489, 496 (7th Cir.) (“each of the checks was negotiated at a different time and place and, therefore, the defendant is responsible for causing separate interstate transportations to take place even if we assume that, for reasons unrelated to his own wrongful conduct, two checks may actually have traveled across state lines in the same interstate carrier”), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Murray v. Haldeman
See also Peterson v. Goodwin, 512 F.2d 479, 480 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Merchant
This court has recognized the fact that the military has a special interest in the elimination of drug abuse by servicemen “in light of the ‘disastrous effects’ these substances [have] ‘on the health, morale and fitness for duty of persons in the armed forced.’ ” Schlesinger v. Councilman, supra, 420 U.S. at 760, n. 34 , 95 S.Ct. at 1314 , quoting in part United States v. Beeker, 18 U.S.C.M.A. 563 , 40 C.M.R. 275, 277 (1969); see also Peterson v. Goodwin, 512 F.2d 479 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 931 , 96 S.Ct. 282 , 46 L.Ed.2d 260 (1976); Committee for GI Rights v. Call…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bonner
v.
Missouri
v.
Missouri
No. 75-5031.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (3)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.