green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"We express no view ... upon the reasonableness of a [lockersearch] for the fruits of a crime not work connected"
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Schowengerdt v. General Dynamics Corporation
we express no view ... upon the reasonableness of a for the fruits of a crime not work connected
cited
Cited "see"
Iowa Beta Chapter Of Phi Delta Theta Fraternity Vs. State Of Iowa, University Of Iowa, And Phillip E. Jones
See United States v. Bunkers, 521 F.2d 1217, 1219 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 989 , 96 S. Ct. 400 , 46 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Iowa Beta Chapter of Phi Delta Theta Fraternity v. State, University of Iowa
See United States v. Bunkers, 521 F.2d 1217, 1219 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 989 , 96 S.Ct. 400 , 46 L.Ed.2d 307 (1975); cf. Mancusi v. De-Forte, 392 U.S. 364, 368-69 , 88 S.Ct. 2120, 2123-24 , 20 L.Ed.2d 1154, 1159-60 (1968) (union official, even though he shared office, was entitled to expect that records would not be taken from his office without his permission).
cited
Cited "see"
Julius C. Streig v. United States Postal Service
Accord, see United States v. Bunkers, 521 F.2d 1217 , 1220 & n. 1 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 989 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Stanley Williams v. Samuel P. Collins, Jr.
See United States v. Bunkers, 521 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 989 , 96 S.Ct. 400 , 46 L.Ed.2d 307 (1975); United States v. Nasser, 476 F.2d 1111 (7th Cir.1973); United States v. Hagarty, 388 F.2d 713 (7th Cir.1968); United States v. Blok, 188 F.2d 1019 (D.C.Cir.1951).
cited
Cited "see"
Los Angeles Police Protective League v. Gates
See United States v. Bunkers, 521 F.2d 1217 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 423 U.S. 989 , 96 S.Ct. 400 , 46 L.Ed.2d 307 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sandy Check
Fed.R.Evid. 103(d), expressly preserving the “plain error” doctrine of Rule 52 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides: “Nothing in this rule precludes taking notice of plain errors affecting substantial rights although they were not brought to the attention of the court.” It is generally true, of course, that “[otherwise inadmissible hearsay to which no objection has been lodged may be considered by the trier-of-fact to the extent of its probative value.” United States v. Leaman, 546 F.2d 148, 150 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 917 , 97 S.Ct. 2180 , 53 L.Ed.2d 227…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peters
v.
Crain Bros., Inc.
v.
Crain Bros., Inc.
No. 75-5377.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 17, 1975.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.